Tolkien Rejected For Nobel Prize Because Of 'Poor Storytelling'

Lord Of The Ringd

First Posted: 06/01/12 07:34 GMT Updated: 08/01/12 23:06 GMT

J. R. R. Tolkien may have won over millions of devoted fans across the globe with The Lord of the Rings, but to a small committee in Sweden known as the Nobel prize jury, his epic tale of Middle Earth just wasn't up to scratch.

Newly declassified documents showing the inner workings of the world's most prestigious literary prize have revealed that, 50 years ago, Tolkien was rejected because The Lord Of The Rings had 'not in any way measured up to storytelling of the highest quality'.

Nominated by his friend C S Lewis - author of The Chronicles Of Narnia - in 1961, Tolkien was swiftly dismissed by the committee along with other lauded figures such as Graham Greene and EM Forster as they awarded that year's prize to Yugoslavian writer Ivo Andrić instead.

Andreas Ekström, the Swedish reporter who made the discovery for newspaper Sydsvenska Dagbladet, said according to the Guardian:

"I have been doing this as a bit of a personal and journalistical tradition the past five years or so, and this was the first time I have seen Tolkien's name among the suggested candidates,

"The academy keeps a strict secrecy around the archives for 50 years, but doesn't reveal everything. The final decision is made without any notes ever becoming public. But the list of suggestions is indeed public, with some commentary to it.

"Tolkien was nominated by CS Lewis, that was the first thing I saw ... Lewis was a professor of literature, and hence qualified to nominate. However, the short commentary from Anders Österling, the dominant literature critic in the academy, was fairly sour. He basically just said about the [Lord of the Rings] trilogy: 'the result has not in any way measured up to storytelling of the highest quality'".

Tolkien, who would have turned 120 this year, won surprisingly few awards for his fiction, despite his work regularly topping reader's polls and being the subject of enduring fascination around the world.

His modest collection of gongs began in 1938 when The Hobbit won a prize awarded by the New York Herald Tribune for best children's story of the year. Later in 1957, The Lord Of The Rings won the International Fantasy Award at the 15th World Science Fiction Convention. Tolkien labeled the rock statuette he was given 'absurd', but kept it nevertheless and claimed to have enjoyed the convention.

Posthumously, The Silmarillion won the Locus Award in 1997 and The Hobbit was awarded the Keith Barker Millennium Book Award Winner in 2000 for being 'the most significant children's book published between 1920 and 1939'.

But perhaps the biggest personal recognition Tolkien ever received came the year before his death when, in 1972, he was honoured as a C.B.E. for his contribution to literature.

Read: Tolkien and fiction's best ever made up languages.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK CULTURE

J. R. R. Tolkien may have won over millions of devoted fans across the globe with The Lord of the Rings, but to a small committee in Sweden known as the Nobel prize jury, his epic tale of Middle Earth...
J. R. R. Tolkien may have won over millions of devoted fans across the globe with The Lord of the Rings, but to a small committee in Sweden known as the Nobel prize jury, his epic tale of Middle Earth...
Filed by Sam Parker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 929
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
07:18 PM on 01/22/2012
Tokliens stories were a masterpiece.he was a man who had vision and an understanding of earth.he made a story about mankind but hid it in fantasy.if you look deep inside his works you will see us as we really are . sadly the films should have been shot were he wrote his books from . the north of england .
11:45 PM on 01/15/2012
Happily we have Toklien's letters, and one can hardly imagine this deeply private, deeply scholarly and poetic soul being remotely interested in literary prizes. He even rebuked his one-time pupil, W.H. Auden, who (correctly) judged Tolkien to be one of the greatest poets in English in the 20th century. Auden of course didn't mean just the songs that Tolkien recorded in the narrative, but the whole quality of the work, which alienated then-contemporary literary audiences because epic narrative was entirely out of fashion & wholly incomprehensible except as some sort of earlier generations.
photo
ProCynic
Those that govern intend to be our masters.
04:48 PM on 01/11/2012
Tolkien created a wonderful, almost fully realized world. His characters became the prototype for much of what Science Fiction and Fantasy have been built on. His language was beautiful. But, in many places he becomes more long winded than necessary.
01:18 AM on 01/11/2012
As I've grown older, my enthusiasm for Tolkien has waned, though I still realize his importance to the fantasy genre. However, that being said, I've read a number of Nobel winners and Hugo winners and honestly, most of them weren't very good. The ones that were good were excellent, but most were quite mundane. I see these "prizes" as having very little to say about the quality of a particular piece of literature.
photo
BobLaughlin
Wrote “The Gospel Of Elvis”, a Bible parody
04:42 AM on 01/10/2012
We were assigned 'The Hobbit' in high school during the hippie era. It was OK. But unlike some of my fellow tribe I had no desire to read another 1,100 pages about sword-fighting dwarves.

For much the same reason I saw only the first Star Wars. Which led to a question I asked in the late 90s of some young co-workers. "Did Luke Skywalker & the princess with the cinnamon-bun hair ever get together?"
09:52 PM on 01/22/2012
Eww thats his sister!
photo
bbrown37
Wherever you go, there you are
08:44 PM on 01/09/2012
Science Fiction allows authors to take controversial and taboo subjects, pin them to a surreal backdrop, and bring them before the public in a non-threatening way.

I am a huge Robert Heinlein fan. When you consider the time/place of his upbringing, in the conservative heart of the bible-belt, the controversial (some of it still) subject matter becomes all the more amazing.

Science Fiction is a form of story-telling as important as verbal traditions and camp-fire recitals. It often "cooks the meat", making hard-truths and wildly hopeful aspirations more easily digestable. As a literary genre, scifi/fantasy is under-appreciated.
06:42 PM on 01/09/2012
But they did give a peace prize to Yassar Arafat, so not being in that crowd is probably a good thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean McSherry
Liberty first. Parties somewhere at the end.
03:39 PM on 01/09/2012
I am glad that they denied them for what they failed TO DO rather then awarding them for what they had the potential to do. Then again, after giving the prize to the president, the only prize winner to bomb another nation, it really has lost its significance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
02:24 PM on 01/09/2012
If you needed any other reason to think of the Nobel Prize as worthless, you got it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PatrickforO
America needs a Labor Party
04:35 AM on 01/09/2012
Academic snobbery strikes again!
photo
SolarPowerGuy
Ph.D., Immunology; Solar power @ home; Green Party
09:20 PM on 01/10/2012
Tolkien was a professor of linguistics himself, you know.

I love Lord of the Rings, but I think that the Nobel Committee was right to say that it wasn't Literature Prize material. Anyone who knows Tolkien and/or mythology can see how the work is a deliberate pastiche of various pre-Christian European mythologies, plus a Christ story for the central character.
01:03 AM on 01/11/2012
Yeah. And you like Ivo Andrić better because ...?
photo
deepintheheartoftejas
Middle o/t Road = Yellow stripes & dead armadillos
01:28 AM on 01/09/2012
That's why we have awards like the Hugo, the World Fantasy Award, the Mythopoeic Society awards. I doubt many fans of speculative fiction care one way or the other about it failing to win the Nobel prize. Many--most in fact--of the significant writers of the past century haven't won it either.
03:17 AM on 01/09/2012
Not really. If you asked most critics who were the most important writers of the 20th century, at least a few would be Nobel laureates: Yeats, Eliot, Hemingway, Hesse, Mann...
alertbay
Veteran, Democrat, retired Copper
12:52 AM on 01/09/2012
I can't say I'm surprised. I've tried to start them twice and found them excruciatingly boring, and have put them down in favor of works by: Mary Renault, Edward Gibbon, Umberto Eco, Patrick O'Brian, Charles Dickens, J.A. Symonds, T.H. White, J.K. Rowling, and a host of others. That said, I'm glad he wrote them as they've brought great pleasure to many people including many who are important to me. Good for you Prof!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
02:26 PM on 01/09/2012
Tolkien was boring, but not Dickens?

Tolkien may have had a tendency to provide seemingly endless walls of text, but unlike Dickens, he wasn't doing that solely because he made more money off of having more words.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Grada3784
Dogmatic Dictators, believers or not, not welcome
02:58 PM on 01/09/2012
I enjoy both. But which I read depends on my mood.
alertbay
Veteran, Democrat, retired Copper
05:03 PM on 01/09/2012
Dickens and Dumas both have some wordy times. But we need to remember that there were practically no copyright laws in those days, so if you were trying to make a living, you needed to use lots of words because there would be lots of pirating. It was literally a matter of bread and butter. But you're right, Dickens has some pretty tedious moments.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Margaret Penny Wood
10:16 PM on 01/08/2012
Well, this shows just how out of touch the Nobel Literature committee is. Tolkein's work and "The Hobbit" in particular show the art of storytelling at its highest. I can't remember when I have enjoyed reading any books more than his. Maybe something was lost in the translation if they were not reading them in English.
05:12 AM on 01/09/2012
They almost always read the literature in its original language, especially when that language is a virtual lingua franca like English is. Most of the people on it know half a dozen languages a piece.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Margaret Penny Wood
05:22 AM on 01/09/2012
I thought that they would, since so much can be lost in translation. That makes it even more puzzling that some of the committee woudl make such disparaging remarks about Tolkein, who is a first class story-teller.
08:25 PM on 01/08/2012
Maybe the only Swedish translation available to the judges in 1961 was lousy. I've read LotR in its entirety probably 20 times over the past 44 years (along with lots of other, more 'prestigious' literature), always find the narrative riveting and moving and never tire of it. To say that it is poor storytelling seems absurd to me. And just because it became wildly popular and inspired many less accomplished imitators does not make it pop lit or 'genre writing.' The Nobel committee has made many good calls, but also many questionable ones (Churchill as the greatest author of his day, from a literary standpoint?), and I think that this is an example of the latter.
12:18 AM on 01/09/2012
The Nobel committee is made up of people who can speak and read several languages.
03:20 PM on 01/09/2012
Lord of the Rings is 'genre writing.' It is in the genre of fantasy. The issue is not whether it is acceptable to call an important work 'genre writing'; the issue is that 'genre writing' should not be used as a pejorative.
02:36 AM on 01/11/2012
Lord of the Rings wasn't "genre writing" when written. Tolkien was an Oxford prof who essentially created the fantasy genre. Or rather, the fantasy genre was created by people who attempted to imitate the master.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martin Beck
was whelped in the back seat of a desoto sky view
08:07 PM on 01/08/2012
the best prize I ever received was at the bottom of a cracker jax box in the carol theater . It was a ........