102-Year-Old Typographist Edward Rondthaler Explains Why English Is A Ludicrous Language (Video)

Huffington Post UK   Alastair Plumb First Posted: 16/01/12 14:57 GMT Updated: 16/01/12 14:59 GMT

Edward Rondthaler was born back in 1905 and died in 2009 at the grand old age of 104, a much-loved and highly-respected typographist.

We introduce you to him because a video he created with type foundry House Industries back in 2007 has gone viral again - and it's such a goodie we can't help share it with you once more.

Displaying astonishing verbal and mental dexterity, he explains via a miniature flip chart just why English as a language makes no sense at all. Sounds a bit boring, doesn't it? Trust us, it isn't. Plus, it ask some seriously important questions...

After all, why doesn't "come" rhyme with "home"? Where's the justice? Where's the... sense, really? Mr. Rondthaler doesn't have the answers, but he's definitely aware of all the problems.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK COMEDY

Edward Rondthaler was born back in 1905 and died in 2009 at the grand old age of 104, a much-loved and highly-respected typographist. We introduce you to him because a video he created with type f...
Edward Rondthaler was born back in 1905 and died in 2009 at the grand old age of 104, a much-loved and highly-respected typographist. We introduce you to him because a video he created with type f...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 99
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
03:29 PM on 01/18/2012
A few previously written articles / poems poking fun at our language:

"Looking at Language Archives: English is a Crazy Language"
(Often found in part and unattributed on the 'net)
http://www.verbivore.com/arc_ceng.htm

The Chaos by Gerard Nolst Trenité
http://ncf.idallen.com/english.html

The true research behind that "It doesn't matter what order the letters in a word are" meme:
http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/matt.davis/Cmabrigde/

And of course why you can't rely on spelling checkers:
http://www.bios.niu.edu/zar/poem.pdf
08:48 PM on 01/17/2012
What a great story about a most inspiring gentleman. Ed was long a supporter of The Stuttering Foundation, lending himself to help people who stutter. The Stuttering Foundation has an incredible global outreach, reaching more than 130 nations each year, mostly in the underdeveloped world where speech therapy is either underdeveloped or non-existent. Their website (www.stutteringhlep.org) is full of free resources for people who stutter of all ages.
03:16 PM on 01/17/2012
What a fun video! I had read about Mr. Rondthaler on the Stuttering Foundation's web site and it is hard to believe that this guy used to stutter. You can read some more interesting articles about this man and his life here http://www.stutteringhelp.org/Default.aspx?tabid=937
layman
Live and Let Live !
03:02 PM on 01/17/2012
Why do schools force kids to memorize all those strange, rarely or never used words in real life for tthe spelling bee contest ?????????? It seems wasting lot of time and effort for a very stupid competition.
layman
Live and Let Live !
03:18 PM on 01/17/2012
Wouldn't they be better off learning something that's way more useful than memorizing words that may not be used in real life with their time and effort ????
KenGirl
Turn Texas Blue in 2016
03:30 PM on 01/17/2012
It makes the brain stronger for those more important activities that require memorizing. I bet such kids would make good doctors. Have you ever looked at the anatomy of a human body, the complexity of it. Do you wonder how doctors know exactly what to prescribe years after they left school. Have you seen the bizzare words in the medical and pharmaceutical field. Spelling bee would be a piece of cake in comparison. I don't think it's a waste of time, and I definitely don't think spelling bees are stupid.
layman
Live and Let Live !
05:43 PM on 01/17/2012
" Do you wonder how 'doctors know exactly what to prescribe years after they left school.' "

Please, don't mislead the public. They don't always know; sometimes, they have to look it up in the mini library in his or her office, or call up their peer. That's a factual statement
02:45 PM on 01/17/2012
There are interesting articles about Ed Rondthaler at www.StutteringHelp.org.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctorJulia
Retired NASA engineer
02:37 PM on 01/17/2012
I guess everybody knows that it was the Elizabethans who screwed up English. Most "experts" believe that English was pretty phonetic until they came along and executed the great vowel shift. I have always advocated going back to the Chauserian phonetic pronunciation. It is too late to change the spelling. Once I tried to read a book aloud using Spanish vowel values. Amazingly enough it is easy to do and any English speaker could learn it in no time.
03:28 PM on 01/17/2012
I didn't know, but thank you, that was interesting.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctorJulia
Retired NASA engineer
02:55 PM on 01/18/2012
I didn't quite make myself clear when I talked about Spanish vowels. What I meant to say was to pick up a book or a newspaper in English and read it slowly using Spanish vowel pronunciation. Spanish has retained the vowels that English used to have. Ilike it and it would make it so much easier for foreigners to learn English.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctorJulia
Retired NASA engineer
02:59 PM on 01/18/2012
The combination "ea" used to be pronounced like the name of the letter "A". After the Elizabethans, it got its present pronunciation llike the name of the letter 'E'. I few words got missed. One it "great". Can you think of any more?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyeshinka
02:31 PM on 01/17/2012
English is something that was invented after a night on tron and Everclear. A Germanic language based on Latin grammar, what could possibly go wrong?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LouGots
02:27 PM on 01/17/2012
Is one language "better" than another? If so, how can we tell?

Surely a question of evolutionary anthropology. What works better? Which language gives its users an advantage in comprehending reality, and in communicating their comprehension to others.

There's more. We must consider how a language defines and expresses categories, such as number, tense, mood and voice and all the rest. How the language empowers its users to think about reality makes the difference. Time, causation, responsibility are understood differently by users of different languages, and some ways of understanding are more or less productive of wealth and power.

And how can we tell which language works better in these ways? One way is just to look at the box score--English is doing quite well, in that regard, being up there with Spanish, although not nearly as big in the number department as Chinese..

I would propose another measurement of success for languages: power. Let us count the number of aircraft carriers aboard which these languages are spoken. The score then? Well , looking at real aircraft carriers, true, CV's and CVN's, with fixed-wing capability, not puny helicopter and jump-jet affairs, we find that there are 11 such vessels.

The number upon which English, that is American English is the official language? Eleven.

In measuring what works, Hillaire Belloc, an English poet, put it best, "“Whatever happens we have got The Maxim Gun and they have not” , ..
02:25 PM on 01/17/2012
He's right. English spelling is dum :).
02:19 PM on 01/17/2012
Yes, English is a vary difficult language to learn be cause of all the rules ewe half too no. Butt, this doesn't mean we should dum it down. The problem is, we're already two dum!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hazelnut101
02:42 PM on 01/17/2012
It's already dum down, always has been. It reminds the of the mental masturbation people will do to "sound" so smart, like how many ways to flush a toilet.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Esper
02:18 PM on 01/17/2012
English isn't a phonetic language. It's hard enough for native speakers to remember all the rules and exceptions (as evidenced on message boards) let alone foreigners. Edward Rondthaler's clip was excellent and his delivery superb. Good job Ed!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
conservativebutnormal
It's the economy stupid...
02:09 PM on 01/17/2012
Leo Gallagher did this in the 80's.
photo
WoodyCPM
Now what?
02:07 PM on 01/17/2012
English is a wild, crazy language, full of traps, counter intuitive spelling and grammar. It's also one of the most vibrant, rich, important languages to have ever evolved. This is not to short change other languages. You can say the same thing in ANY language. And certainly there are more melodious languages than English. But in English there is about a dozen ways to say the same thing and still be intelligible. You can even mangle the grammar, syntax and spelling and still get your point across. It's a very forgiving language. Which is also why it's so easy to pun in English. And no one does it better than the English nor make it sound as precise, powerful and beautiful as the English. English absorbs words from other languages like a sponge and then Anglicises them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdiasmd
Honey Badger Don't Care!
02:06 PM on 01/17/2012
Comedian, Gallager used to do this routine before he'd start hammering watermelons.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=yDFQXxWIyvQ#t=193s
photo
one1byke
Easy no Man.
02:04 PM on 01/17/2012
I need Peter Griffin to handle the "c o m e " for me....
if fact, this would be a great Peter Griffin skit!

GIRL
CIRL
CURL... I get it! Dont worry Mr. R, we're working on the dialectic... na'ah mean?
Something else to complain about....