Stephen Hester Bonus: Replacing RBS Team Would Be 'Expensive', Says David Cameron

Stephen Hester

First Posted: 28/01/2012 14:02 Updated: 28/01/2012 15:32

Replacing RBS chairman Stephen Hester could prove "more expensive" than maintaining the status quo, David Cameron warned on Saturday.

After news of Hester's bonus broke, activists, politicians and public figures argued over whether the near on £1m figure should be awarded as the company is publically owned.

Even staunch City defender Boris Johnson stated that Cameron should "step in and sort it out".

But the prime minister insisted it was Hester's decision over whether to accept his bonus - a relatively modest one in banking terms. Reported by the Press association, Cameron added that installing a new top team at RBS would be even more costly.

"It's obviously [Hester's] decision," Cameron said. "My decision is to make sure the team at RBS get on with the job of turning the bank round and we made our views very clear on the bonus and that's why it was cut in half compared to last year."

Cameron was speaking at Chequers as news emerged that RBS chairman Sir Philip Hampton had decided to waive his £1.4m shares bonus.

Cameron added: "I think we need to get the facts straight.

"The fact is Stephen Hester was brought in by the last government, a contract signed by the last Government to turn round RBS - a bank that had got itself into a complete mess.

"The government has made its views known and that is why his bonus was cut in half compared to last year.

"But we do have to bear in mind that the alternatives to what's happening now could be even more expensive if you had a whole new team coming into RBS."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Replacing RBS chairman Stephen Hester could prove "more expensive" than maintaining the status quo, David Cameron warned on Saturday. After news of Hester's bonus broke, activists, politicians and ...
Replacing RBS chairman Stephen Hester could prove "more expensive" than maintaining the status quo, David Cameron warned on Saturday. After news of Hester's bonus broke, activists, politicians and ...
Filed by Lucy Sherriff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 49
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:07 PM on 01/29/2012
Mr Hester has refused his bonus, and that makes him an ever smaller man than yesterday
09:34 PM on 01/29/2012
Mr Cameron, there are times when pragmatism is a far greater risk than decisiveness.
08:09 AM on 01/29/2012
This will come back to haunt you Mr cameron,
This is simply another smack in the teeth from you to the suffering taxpayer,
I look forward to watching you grovel your way out of this at the next election,
When you are next at the house of commons , stand up and try this.....
Take a deep breath and say " I agree to capping benefits at £26000 and I agree to Mr Hester getting his £963000.
Not sure that you are strong enough for the job ,
12:17 AM on 01/29/2012
He should accept this as he has earned it, but should give it all to charities of his choice - A lot of them are having a very tough time right now as donations tumble. I think that might satisfy a lot of people,and will make Mr Hester seem less an ogre. It might even make him feel good.
11:40 PM on 01/28/2012
RBS chief Stephen Hester in line for £7m payout despite bonus cut

Stephen Hester could still receive a pay package for his work last year worth more than £7m, even after RBS moved to cut his annual bonus to less than £1m.
In a statement on Thursday night, the bank said Mr Hester would get a bonus of £963,000 as the taxpayer-backed lender bowed to political and public pressure to ensure its chief executive was not handed more than £1m.
However, the bank admitted Mr Hester was still potentially eligible for an award under a long-term incentive plan (LTIP) worth as much as £4.8m.
This means his total pay package for last year including his £1.2m salary and £420,000 pension could reach £7.38m.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DaveJohnWard
09:05 AM on 01/29/2012
But if you read the article and RBS comments the key words are: 'potentially'; 'could'; 'might'; 'if'.
The important point, and I think this builds on Nick Clegg's suggestion about moving to a 'John Lewis' form of capitalism is that much of it is in shares. If the company does well then he does well, if the company does badly, then he does badly. Maybe there is a case for insisting that 75% of an executive's salary package should be in company shares which they can't sell for 3 years. That would certainly change their focus away from short termism
09:31 PM on 01/29/2012
Methinks he doth protest too much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DaveJohnWard
09:49 PM on 01/28/2012
As I've already said on a number of other threads, look at the facts not the hype. Under Stephen's leadership RBS has gone from basket case with over £600 BILLION of toxic assets, to a company which is beginning to make profits in its core business areas and has reduced the toxic assets to under £100bn. He must be doing something right, and by and large the employees support him in that (declaration of interest, I'm an employee).
If anyone is interested in facts follow this link https://changingthebank.rbs.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Lucie-Smith
Art historian, photographer, poet
11:28 PM on 01/28/2012
This is an excellent post. You put a guy in to do a massive clean up job. He gets some way into doing what you asked him to do. Then you don't want to pay him. By all means penalize those who got RBS into this mess. But not those who are getting the organisation out the mire. The politics of envy do not work. All that happens is that the real talent goes elsewhere. I'm sure Mr Hester, despite his massive bonus, could find a better paying job than this one tomorrow, simply on the basis of his record in trying to put RBS on its feet again.
11:43 PM on 01/28/2012
Dream on...
09:29 PM on 01/28/2012
The RBS is 82% owned by the taxpayer. Therefore Mr. Hester is a public employee. There is a pay freeze on public sector salaries. What applies to nurses, police offficers and service personnel should equally apply to him. "We're all in this together!"
07:59 AM on 01/29/2012
If you notice, his bonus has been cut from last year, not frozen. Do you suggest that everyone in public service should do the same?
09:17 PM on 01/28/2012
I think we should leave poor Stephen alone - after all, he's got the awful headache - just how does he spend £963000! Rather than vilify him, damn it, i've decided to help him! Here are my ten top tips to spend £963,000.
Follow the link: http://www.allthatsleft.co.uk/2012/01/10-things-to-do-with-963000/
09:05 PM on 01/28/2012
How much did our M.P's fiddle doing thier jobs?.....they got/get a good wage and still fiddled the tax payers..none of them have done a days graft in thier lives....they are never happy as i see it.
08:55 PM on 01/28/2012
He really is bloody hopeless, a rabbit in the headlights, panic and fear are his allies, that we do not need.
08:34 PM on 01/28/2012
Cameron could make it nigh on impossible for this man to take his unmerrited so-called 'bonus' with one simple condemnatory statement. The country should rid itself of these creeps and spongers. They have grown up being spoon fed and think that the rest of us owe them a living. As the Byrds song goes ... "Some rob you with a sixgun ... and some with a fountain pen!!!" But with the corrupt governments that we have (whether it be Tory or Labour it makes no difference now) these parasites will always get away with it. For goodness sake can 'someone' please make a political stand against this ugly and evil sector of our nation, these capitalist greedsters. The people of this country want them OUT!! Cameron is wet. He is one of them and terrified of upsetting his own brotherhood.This country needs leadership at the present and not cronyism!! These people are allowed to accumulate and sit on their vast wealth whist millions get poorer and more and more hopeless.
08:49 PM on 01/28/2012
Agreed
08:54 PM on 01/28/2012
could you do his job, i do not think so, if you worked how would you have time to claim your benefits i agree lets get rid of spongers set the benefit cap at the oap rate.
09:12 PM on 01/28/2012
It would be in my primary capacity to do his job.
09:14 PM on 01/28/2012
I don't pretent to be able to do his job Charley. Fact is neiher could he without the support of the rest of his breed. But there a many that could. From an early age his kind are taught how to hang on to their inherited wealth and then how to manipulate the money market so that their nest egg will grow and grow and grow. And so that is how the wealth of the nation is controled and manipulated by the few. It is not dispersed fairly throughout the nation. If it was we would stand a chance of rebuilding our manufacturing base rather than depending upon service industries and importing crap from China etc.As Mark Steele said on Question Time the Government has just written off £20 billion of debt owed by offshore companies to our nation. But they are cutting back severley on services that are vital to the elderly and disabled. Of course our senior politicians such as Cameron and Blair have already accrued sufficient wealth to ensure that they will never have to depend on the welfare state that they are intent on destroying. And don't they show it?! You are making the people of this country impatient, angry and resentful Mr Cameron! And the time for payback will come!
08:20 PM on 01/28/2012
Another fact we need to get straight, Mr Cameron, is that the coalition's Programme for Government, published in May 2010, has Banking as Item One on its agenda. You promised us "robust action to tackle unacceptable bonuses in the financial services sector".

So, tell me, is your decision to let Hester himself decide about his bonus your idea of 'robust action'?

Personally, I would describe it as 'cowardice'.
08:07 PM on 01/28/2012
The best of it is that Santander will be taking over the English side of operations, The RBS will retreat back to Scotland because the PM said they had to offer it up for sale due to the bailout, and so another bank in the hands of foreigners. You could not make it up........................................
07:30 PM on 01/28/2012
This sort of lunacy could stop within one month. All RBS and NatWest customers arrange to transfer their bank accounts by the end of February. I won't hold my breath, because to do that implies people have principles.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:02 PM on 01/28/2012
Spot on mate....I have three bank accounts, two of which i keep £1 in so it costs them to service. Churlish maybe but its my armchair rebelious streak . I feel empathy for the front line staff who take all the flak on £15k p.a. from disgruntled customers.
09:18 PM on 01/28/2012
Dont hold your breath people are not stupid, many of us are switching to RBS every month they are a future success.