'Soft Subjects' Cut From GCSE League Tables To Boost Pupils' Prospects

Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 31/01/2012 05:15 Updated: 21/06/2012 11:50

UPDATE: Michael Gove confirms education reform plans before Commons

A mere 70 vocational qualifications will count towards schools' future GCSE performances, a sharp decrease from more than 3,000 under the current system.

The move, announced on Tuesday, is part of an attempt by the government to stop schools encouraging youngsters to take qualifications which boost the institution's league table position but do not help a pupil's prospects.

Ministers confirmed that just 125 vocational qualifications will be included from 2014. Of these, only 70 will count towards the main performance measure - the percentage of pupils getting at least five Cs at GCSE, including English and maths.
The other 55 will count in the tables, but will not contribute towards the main measure.

Plans to slash the numbers of "equivalent" qualifications were first announced by ministers last year following Professor Alison Wolf's review of vocational education.

Under the current system, 3,175 vocational or "equivalent" courses count in the league tables, and some of these are multiple GCSEs.

For example, a level 2 BTEC in horse care, one of the qualifications to be cut from the new style tables, is worth four GCSEs at grade C or higher.

The new system will see every qualification count equally in the tables.

Among the others that will not be included in the future are the Level 1 certificate in practical office skills (worth two GCSEs), the BTEC level 2 extended certificate in fish husbandry (worth two GCSEs) and the level 2 certificate in nail technology services (worth two GCSEs).

A diploma in horse care currently equates to four GCSEs while nail technology is worth two.

Wolf said she was delighted with the announcement.

"Vocational studies can form a stimulating and demanding part of the curriculum.

“But pretending that all vocational qualifications are equally valuable does not bring them respect. On the contrary, it devalues vocational education in people's eyes."

Qualifications that will still count include many of the diplomas introduced by the last government and a number of BTECs and OCR Nationals covering areas such as performing arts, sport, health and social care, media, music and engineering.

Some of the courses which will count in the tables are still subject to further review because they are either too new, or still have to demonstrate they have all the characteristics needed to be included, the Department for Education said.

Education Secretary Michael Gove said: "The weaknesses in our current system were laid bare by Professor Wolf's incisive and far-reaching review. The changes we are making will take time but will transform the lives of young people.

"For too long the system has been devalued by attempts to pretend that all qualifications are intrinsically the same. Young people have taken courses that have led nowhere."

But not everyone agrees. Clare (@dailydenouement) tweeted: "Wondering how I'd feel as a student on a vocational course to hear the govt say it does "nothing" for my prospects. Demoralised, I expect."

Qualifications that do not meet the set standards can still be offered by schools but will not count in the league tables.

Labour's shadow education secretary Stephen Twigg said he felt the government seemed as if it "did not care" about vocational qualifications.

"A lot of those courses are very worthwhile subjects," he told the BBC. "Hairdressing, for example, is a very important job. Young people learning about this alongside those studying maths, for example, is a very proper thing to do."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK UNIVERSITIES & EDUCATION

 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
21:55 on 31/01/2012
It's about time this happened. No matter how 'demanding' an NVQ course is, it is NOT a GCSE and never will be. Schools have been allowed to short change students by running these courses while persuading them that the qualification gained is worth 4 GCSEs when in the real world, this is simply not the case. Potential employers are simply not fooled by these non qualifications

Until recently I worked in education an was disgusted to hear of a girl being given the 'equivalent' of HALF a GCSE for completing a teen pregnancy avoidance course! Selfish schools should stop thinking of their position in the league tables and start working towards providing young people with skill and qualifications that will actually mean something when it comes to the world of employment and further education
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
minimemo
Can I be your friend...if they let me out...
21:06 on 31/01/2012
Where exactly are the resources coming from for these 3,000 different subjects. Perhaps cut them all and pool resources. And who exactly is teaching them these 'vocational' lessons. Are fully qualified £30k plus a year teachers showing kids how to apply nail polish and muck out horses??? All these 'vocational' subjects should be done after completing compulsory education at 16 of the 8-10 core subjects. May even lead to kids leaving school being able to read, write and add up, shock horror!
17:58 on 31/01/2012
An acknowledgement of what most people have known for ages. Better late than never. Incidentally I believe that there is a valuable place for vocational courses and qualifications, just as there was a valuable plce for the "technical" colleges in a world of Grammar Schools, and secondary moderns. As well as having apprentices in companies.

Some people learn better from doing, some from being taught, and some will excel in real world jobs rather than ethereal "thinking" type roles. There is a place for everything, but let it be seen as such.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
minimemo
Can I be your friend...if they let me out...
21:08 on 31/01/2012
I agree, however school is not the place. After leaving school at 16 is time for the vocations. We have a legal obligation to provide children with an accademic education, no wonder that is failing with all these 'extras'!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
14:08 on 31/01/2012
Good, the quicker humanity re-learns the importance and universality of the liberal arts the quicker we the people can regain control of civilisation.
To quote Forrest Gump ‘stupid is as stupid does’
14:08 on 31/01/2012
If all 'soft subjects' were cut from GCSEasy League Tables there would be no subjects left.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DaveJohnWard
12:16 on 31/01/2012
This is a perfect example of the law of unintended consequences. The idea of vocational training, and pupils receiving recognition for attaining non-academic skills is perfectly valid. When it is introduced with little or no control and the parties involved have a vested interest in boosting performance stats then you will end up with the ludicrous situation we found ourselves in.
The real losers (as always) are the kids, because when it comes to the harsh realities of getting a job, employers are not going to be fooled by these fake qualifications.
Well done to Mr Gove for cutting through the rubbish and outing the problem, his next challenge is to ensure that the subjects which do remain are really those which will help to move this country forward
10:06 on 31/01/2012
70 is still far too many.

The staple subjects used to be English, Maths, a language and two Science or Arts subjects from Biology, Physics, Chemistry, English Literature, Geography, History and a second (or third) language choice. Passing these at 'O' level (not the lesser GCSE's where grade A equated to a grade 4 O level) was an achievement that rated highly with employers.

What we now have are many subjects that are meaningless in the jobs market except in very small niche markets that only ever have very few vacancies.
09:27 on 31/01/2012
Perhaps it is about time that the Gcse are seperated from other qualifications, so someone can then say they have three gcse, a diploma in horse care, one in nail tech and one in the life and times of the latest celebrity. That way an employer can see that the prospective employee has some academic qualifications and has also gained extra qualifications to look after their celebrity-owned horse needing its nails done daily!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mokgee
Sabu.Satsang, Samsara, Solitude...
08:52 on 31/01/2012
Huffpost cowards have retreated yet again, with the comment of mokgee, being deleted yet again. This country will never survive thanks to the weakness of the politicians, endorsed by the Huffpost media.The next time you all go shopping, see if one can find a new spine, even a second hand one will do..........