I have a dream. I have a dream that one day no article about women and their careers will need to mention their beauty regime or their wardrobe. What bothers me is that in articles about women their appearance so often becomes part of defining their success. It's hardly furthering the cause.
It isn't the details of a person's personal life encroaching on their professional life that grates. Successful people are created by who they are and not just by what they achieve at work. It is interesting to learn that someone runs 20km to work or spends their spare time writing poetry. These things maketh the (wo)man. What becomes annoying is the unnecessary detail, the detail that doesn't contribute to an understanding of why an individual has achieved what they have.
I read an article last year about easyJet chief executive Carolyn McCall – only the third female boss of an FTSE 100 company – that I wish I'd saved, so refreshing was its approach. It made me hopeful about the portrayal of women in the media. Not once did it mention her appearance. There was no talk of her home life. She was defined neither by her looks nor by whether she had kids. Other than the startling fact that few women feature in the FTSE, she was written about neutrally – not as a man or a woman but as a business person. In fact, the treatment that men normally receive.
The piece about Carolyn McCall proved that it can be done – that a woman can be portrayed as simply being damned good at her job with not one ounce of that success being attributed to (or at least mentioned alongside) how she looks. We don't need to know where she shops, whether she waxes or which member of One Direction she prefers. It may seem remarkable to some, but having balls isn't just the preserve of men.
Helen is a freelance publisher, writer and editor and a mum-of-two.
Blogs at: Crumbs and Pegs
Twitter: @hlvr