Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Brigitte Sesu Tilley-Gyado

GET UPDATES FROM Brigitte Sesu Tilley-Gyado

Sick Society vs. Big Society

Posted: 15/08/11 01:00 BST

During the riots we were forced to acknowledge the existence of Two Britains; one in which the rule of law was upheld and where people shared a common set of moral values, and a shadow Britain of morally displaced others who do not share these values. David Cameron has referred to these anti-social elements of British society as 'sick'. The Prime Minister's ideal of Big Society had clashed with the reality of a very Sick Society.

There are complex and multiple causes of this societal 'sickness': a lack of unifying local community identities and a cohesive National identity; a culture that is ambivalent to violence; a global climate of unrest; a breakdown in traditional values; the breakdown of the nuclear family; high rates of teenage pregnancy; a culture of materialistic entitlement and debt; socio-economic inequality based along the lines of race and class.

What then are the cures for this sick element of society comprised mainly of young people? How do we transform young people with anti-social values into young people with positive pro-social identities and robust inclusion in their communities and wider Britain as a whole?

The cure for such a potentially serious societal sickness must be equally drastic and happen urgently. Building positive personal and pro-social identities requires new strategies, new thinking about the way that we educate children in families and at school, and fully exploiting the potential of the local community. The riots have shown us that the time to rethink our priorities and methods when it comes to positively moulding the identities of our youth is now.

A revision of the purposes of formal education is necessary. Mentoring is the process of instilling of values and is vital for the formation of social identity. Mentoring needs to begin early. Mentoring should start at home, later through children at school and more widely with older relatives and community elders as well as mentoring services. Cross-generational mentoring should be prioritised as well as the inclusion of mentors in all schools to ensure the continued moral and social wellbeing of children who may not receive such support from the home.

The recent anarchic scenes of young children running riot on the streets of England evoked visions of a Dickensian apocalypse. Yet perhaps the Victorians could teach us something about the potential of the local community. In the 19th Century Civic leaders fostered a civic identification with the local polity by promoting a strong local economy and promoting social capital.By social capital I mean the idea that individuals must invest in their communities in order to fully identify with them. This investment is through charitable acts, taxes, building businesses, and generally 'putting in' to their communities.

In the 19th Century, municipal leaders raised their own revenues and organised the collective life of their communities, built hospitals and schools, sewers, set up public gas and electricity companies and built many of the great Victorian buildings. Citizens actively participated by giving to their communities through local philanthropy.

A critical rethinking of the education system is necessary so that school curriculums include structured and incentivised ways for children to actively practise social responsibility and regularly take part in charities, volunteering and social entrepreneurship initiatives in their communities.

A model of youth mentoring leading to youth led social entrepreneurship is The Rosebush Foundation's programme 'What Goes Around Comes Around' scheme'. In this scheme children are taught social responsibility by organising weekly non-profit community projects and receive cross-generational mentoring in return.

This model of strong active citizen participation should be seen as a complement rather than an alternative to hard work and determination to reduce and punish crime, fight prejudice and promote fair life chances for all members of society. .

"England", as Nelson told his soldiers as they prepared for the Battle of Trafalgar," expects that every man this day will do his duty". It is vital that we all do our part and indeed duty to rise socially included young people who identify positively with their communities and country.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:04 AM on 09/06/2011
This is absolute nonsense. There is only one world. There is dire inequality in that world, but it remains a single world. The disenfranchised, dispossessed, and the inconvenient-for-markets are your brothers and sisters and any attempt to slough off their interrelation to the inequality-generating economic system for the betterment of your own image, prestige and distinction is utterly disgraceful and morally repugnant.
12:45 PM on 08/16/2011
The poor in Victorian times were completely disenfranchised and died in abject poverty leaving little behind them. They were not reported on, even as statistics. Some enlightened rich people saw the need for philanthropy. Most cared only about profit. That is my understanding of history.

Whilst I laud the sentiment of your article, Bridgitte, I have to say that not much has changed, really. Of course, we have less abject poverty and people are not dying in the gutter but there is still a huge disparity between the 'successful' people in our society and the others.

Add to this the fact that some 'successful' people still think its ok to commit fraud so long as they can get away with it and you have a recipe for huge marginalisation... a gulf.

Free-market capitalism does not work for the majority. Witness the amount of debt required by most to have a 'respectable' lifestyle - mortgage, car HP, furniture HP, etc etc. Then consider the kind of debt poorer people with no means to pay also accrue. Consider the ongoing images we're given of what we should be aspiring to. The fact is that most people are being chased around by debt companies now - even our adolescents. The future for our children is not good. And they know it.

With respect to you it is not mentoring that's required here. It's Enlightenment.
11:06 PM on 08/15/2011
I thought that you wrote an inspired and though provoking article.

As for shared moral values, I thought the rioters did share moral vaules, the morals were low and not in keeping with the rest of the country, but the shear number of rioters and looters proved that a significant number definately shared the same plunderous morals.

I do agree that it is time to rethink the way that children are educated and I think it is also time to reassess the whole topic of political correctness, in these times where schools can't promote the state religion in 'church shools'- (Lets not forget the Monarcy is the head of the State and the Church of England) in the form of hymns and bible readings on moral subjects for fear of reprisal and insenstivity for other cultures is it realy a suprise that there is no social identity or moral understanding?

As the joke goes; How do you define and English Man?
He drives a German Car, Drinks Belgain Beer, his favorite food is Argentinian Beef.

Is there anything British left in the UK to rally around?

I'm also inclined to agree with Blockem1's comments below, it's all well and good coming down hard on the rioters, but with the MP's Expenses scandal in the not too distant past, is this not a case of the pots calling and the kettle black.

www.SeeingTheReflection.com
01:31 AM on 08/16/2011
As the joke goes; How do you define and English Man?
He drives a German Car, Drinks Belgain Beer, his favorite food is Argentinia­n Beef.

Which takes me to the next point on social cohesion : on Identity . .....stay tuned, sir !
11:18 AM on 08/16/2011
OK, that's a lot of words but where's the workable solution?
08:04 PM on 08/15/2011
Socio-babble aside, it is time to recognize that virtually all crime is caused by criminals. If you are a criminal you should go to jail for a very long time. If you are committing a violent crime against people or property, extreme violence against you is fully justified. If those who are burning and looting thought there was any significant chance that they would be gutted by a shotgun blast they would think much harder (are they thinking about anything other than greed, avarice and envy now?) before engaging in crime.

A minimum 5 year sentence should be applied to all who are convicted of burning, looting or conspiring to loot. These people are not part of society in any healthy way and they should be removed from it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aroddo
11:11 PM on 08/15/2011
however, bankers that commit fraud in the billions don't get sentenced - they get bonuses for their good work.

no wonder that this new kind of "american dream" captures the heart and minds of the "lower class": They get shown every day in their live by the rich, that only crime pays.
01:33 AM on 08/16/2011
this reminds me of a the hypocrisy of morality in a poem I read long ago. The gist of that poem being that in war, killing is rewarded with a medal,yet in times of peace the same act merits prison. It seems that what is good for the goose is not good for the gander ....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blockem1
When will our politicians start putting policies
07:53 PM on 08/15/2011
Is it not sick to have MP's and civil servants that fiddle expenses,the corporate and personal tax avoidance , police bribery ,spending billions on Afghanistan and useless aircraft carriers,Newspapers that hack phones,foreign government bribery,£5 billion over spend on the Olympics,the failure of our education system,the complete lack of accountability from our leaders and complete ignorance of the very real widening gap between the rich and the poor.If you are going to fix the problem dont you you need to start at the top.
05:07 PM on 08/15/2011
I worked in the UK on building sites in 1974 & 1975 my observation of the working man Taxed high and only joy fortnight to the sea and pints and telly nightly lived in council house with my landlady she had a hard time then . Will it get better I really wonder.
01:36 AM on 08/16/2011
that does not sound like fun at all. 'Plus ca change plus c'est la meme chose' - the more things change the more they remain the same . We shall keep trying our collective best and hope for it too
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Freedom Sithole
03:30 PM on 08/15/2011
The idea of the wealthy contributing to their locality as they did in the old victorian era, doesn't really work in the days of national and trans-national companies. We no longer have a society were the lord of the manor lives just up the road and has an interest in making sure his serfs are provided for. The modern lord of the manor is more interested in what subsidies and tax breaks you can give him in order for him to build in your locality. All the Lords and Ladies of the Manor now live in Chelsea and Westminster and have no need to make social investments in tacky old croydon, peckham or salford.
11:36 AM on 08/15/2011
Zero Degrees of Empathy by Simon Baron-Cohen is a must read for anyone. Empathy is something that should be taught in all schools, it does not cost anything to teach it so lets do it. I went on the hardest hit demo a few months ago with my 9 year old son (he has autism and epilepsy) in London and the police down there where fantastic and very understanding and I will not hear of any badness said about them. I by the way come from a council house up North rent paid for by my son's dad and we love it.Cheer up everyone.
09:28 AM on 08/15/2011
While agreeing with a lot in this article I suspect it`s policies would fall at the first hurdle. The idea that we, the people, feel a collective responsibility is difficult to establish in a fractured society. It is even more difficult in an economy in decline.
04:28 PM on 08/15/2011
Good point .
lastpost
see biography
08:19 AM on 08/15/2011
"the existence of Two Britains"
There are far more than that. Proof: Consider each and every individual that has been interviewed. Do any of their understandings match? So, what and where is that which they are attempting to describe? Appreciate the existence of the delusion, and we’re on our way to overcoming the dilemma.

"There are complex and multiple causes of this"
No, just one. See above.

"How do we transform"
Simple. We require only two things.
1. To acknowledge what it is we are trying to do.
2. To recognise what it is that impedes us.
Both of these are best revealed by asking questions of the individual.
1. Because they already inherently know the answer.
2. Because unless it originates from within them, they usually won’t believe or accept it.

"moulding the identities of our youth"
The very last thing we should to do is mould anyone. Especially into the image of deluded idiots like ourselves.

"The riots have shown us that the time to"
question was long ago. But instead of integrating that technique, we eliminated the inventor.

"A revision of the purpose"
Teach the art of questioning. Sorry for any outbreak of debate and transparency. That is always going to happen, when those who profess knowledge are exposed to queries Now stand back and let intellect have its day.

"England, as Nelson told his soldiers"
is a my palace and your prison. But we don’t want to flag that up.
04:56 AM on 08/15/2011
Youth mentoring is both pro-active and child-centred. I applaud its achievements thus far. However, much as I would be delighted to see municipalities making philanthropic contributions, the resources of local authorities are already stretched and very few of the well-off have the same sense of connection to their communities as their Victorian counterparts. If the choice is between investing in young people and personal indulgence, most wealthy individuals will, alas, persuade themselves that charity begins at second or third home.
04:42 PM on 08/15/2011
I like the idea of charity beginning at the second or the third home . Hilarious, yet sadly true....And I blame it partly on high tax rates