Apple is hardly a beacon of environmental good practice, but that doesn't mean Steve Jobs didn't play his part in helping to find a solution to climate change.
Climate change does not have an awareness problem. It does, however, have a marketing problem. Plenty has been done to raise awareness, but very little has been done to effectively market green solutions to the general public.
Of course, the climate change problem is very simple to sum up: the human race is producing more and more carbon dioxide, therefore global temperatures are rising, therefore the earth will eventually no longer be a place that human beings are able to exist in. In a nutshell: "Hello dinosaurs and dodos, nice to meet you, we're the human race!"
It's the simplicity of this message that seems to make it the default when people try and talk to the public about sustainability.
The actions that individuals can take to help combat climate change are so much more difficult to summarise. This is because the behaviours that are causing us to produce too much carbon dioxide are wide ranging. Just think about all the ways you could waste energy in your home: washing clothes at unnecessarily high temperatures, sitting around in shorts and t-shirt with the heating pumping out to the max, re-boiling the kettle because you forgot to make your brew the first time it boiled. The list goes on, and that's before you've even put a foot outside your front door.
There is no one-size-fits-all way to discourage humans from behaving in these ways. In some cases, the free market, driven by the profit motive, can provide a way for the public to consume products in a less wasteful way. The iPod is a great example of this. By creating this product, Steve Jobs and Apple vastly reduced the demand for CDs, the plastic cases that they come in and the transportation that is required to take them to the shops.
Of course, product innovations such as the iPod won't always be the answer. For other behaviours, it's necessary to motivate the public to consume less, not just differently.
For some people, appeals to thrift might work. In these times of economic turmoil and rising energy prices, the financial motive for energy efficient homes has never been stronger. But when it comes to behaviour change, the solution is rarely as one-dimensional as that. Not everyone is motivated in the same way, and therefore not everyone cares about financial prudence.
Similarly, not everyone is equally empowered to change their behaviour. So reinsulating the loft to save money might float a homeowner's boat, but someone living in rented accommodation is less likely to know how their heating system works, or feel able to do much about it. They might, however, be persuaded to turn down their heating to a lower temperature if they can be convinced that having it too hot is drying out their skin and making them age prematurely (which it is).
The possible solutions to high-carbon behaviours are almost endless, but what almost all of them have in common is that they do not require the consumer to understand the problem they are helping to solve - just as people who bought the iPod probably did not know (or care) that they were reducing the demand for CDs.
The person who puts on a jumper so they can turn down their heating and protect their skin does not need to know how much CO2 they have saved - nor does the person who ditches the car for the bike because they want to be fitter, or the person who takes canvas bags to the supermarket because they have cooler designs and are more comfortable on the fingers than plastic ones.
Whether knowingly or not, Steve Jobs made us all accidental environmentalists, but that was never part of the marketing strategy. We all bought iPods because they were more convenient, beautifully designed and - crucially - because Apple managed to convince us that we would be happier with one than without.
We need to find more green solutions like this for a whole range of behaviours. This presents a much greater creative challenge than simply talking about melting ice caps, carbon calculators or slapping an "eco" label on something. It's time for us all to take inspiration from Steve Jobs and step up to this creative challenge.
Follow Chris Deary on Twitter: www.twitter.com/global_cool
David Foster: The Cost of Climate Change Is Jobs
Gernot Wagner: Naomi Klein Is Half Right About Capitalism vs. the Climate
The Big Picture: climate change | Environment | The Observer
2/ diesel engined vehicles will be forced to have particle filters fitted or face a heavy rise in road tax the fact that it costs a fortune to fit one ,and it has to be emptied at a certified garage 2 or 3 time a year ,and that not all diesels are suitable to have one fitted because their engines are not suitable does not worry the government ,they call this being green anyone else knows its for the money and will cause hyper inflation and misery for millions of over taxed families in this country
Green dont make me laugh its about the MONEY MONEY MONEY ITS ABOUT THE MONEY MONEY !
http://www.billionairechronicles.net/billionaire-news/branson-on-steve-jobs-%E2%80%9Che-was-completely-different-from-me-%E2%80%9D
Did Steve deduce that there was a requirement for a device? Was that requirement devolved to him? Or was there no known requirement, until the product was delivered? We have the means available to us to capitalise on all these possibilities and more. Why not a site where a need or wish for a product can be declared? Accessible from a multitude of platforms. Where tweaks to the specification might be suggested. Hints as to how that item might operate input. A way to vote to indicate potential customer interest added. In order that the desires of the masses might be better met, by companies interesting in finding ideas and a ready made market for new products.
For example, at Global Cool we ran a campaign to promote Swishing Parties, which is basically swapping clothes with your friends in a fun, social environment rather than going out and buying them. The well being derived from getting a new wardrobe has been satisfied, as has the desire for the social element of shopping with friends - but no extra clothes have been bought from any shops.
For some there my also be a financial incentive to a behaviour like this, but for the type of person who normally buys clothes on credit card, worrying about the consequences later, there is a whole set of different motivations at play.
Thanks for the comment.
Solar power has become much less expensive and it's getting better all the time. Once people become more familiar with it they soon realize that they aren't that fond of giving lots of their money to the power companies just so they can dump tons of pollution into the air.
These new technologies help the environment, but I think they have an even more profound effect on people's outlook and sense of well being. No longer being dependent on oil companies or power companies is a feeling you have to experience to understand. It a sense of both freedom and empowerment.
you used get a subsidy for solar farms ,that,s gone ,then you used to get a subsidy for having solar panels on your roof that,s gone ,next will be the road tax free electric car that will go,
along with peoples perception that green is good ,because the government is taxing the ***t out of it .this is the dwell time back in 2005 peak oil was reached but the government just forgot to tell us so they had the oil wars ,now they have to have a structure in place for a reliable income ,its called the green structure !