Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Chris Deary

GET UPDATES FROM Chris Deary
 

Solving Climate Change the Steve Jobs Way

Posted: 06/12/11 00:00

Apple is hardly a beacon of environmental good practice, but that doesn't mean Steve Jobs didn't play his part in helping to find a solution to climate change.

Climate change does not have an awareness problem. It does, however, have a marketing problem. Plenty has been done to raise awareness, but very little has been done to effectively market green solutions to the general public.

Of course, the climate change problem is very simple to sum up: the human race is producing more and more carbon dioxide, therefore global temperatures are rising, therefore the earth will eventually no longer be a place that human beings are able to exist in. In a nutshell: "Hello dinosaurs and dodos, nice to meet you, we're the human race!"

It's the simplicity of this message that seems to make it the default when people try and talk to the public about sustainability.

The actions that individuals can take to help combat climate change are so much more difficult to summarise. This is because the behaviours that are causing us to produce too much carbon dioxide are wide ranging. Just think about all the ways you could waste energy in your home: washing clothes at unnecessarily high temperatures, sitting around in shorts and t-shirt with the heating pumping out to the max, re-boiling the kettle because you forgot to make your brew the first time it boiled. The list goes on, and that's before you've even put a foot outside your front door.

There is no one-size-fits-all way to discourage humans from behaving in these ways. In some cases, the free market, driven by the profit motive, can provide a way for the public to consume products in a less wasteful way. The iPod is a great example of this. By creating this product, Steve Jobs and Apple vastly reduced the demand for CDs, the plastic cases that they come in and the transportation that is required to take them to the shops.

Of course, product innovations such as the iPod won't always be the answer. For other behaviours, it's necessary to motivate the public to consume less, not just differently.

For some people, appeals to thrift might work. In these times of economic turmoil and rising energy prices, the financial motive for energy efficient homes has never been stronger. But when it comes to behaviour change, the solution is rarely as one-dimensional as that. Not everyone is motivated in the same way, and therefore not everyone cares about financial prudence.

Similarly, not everyone is equally empowered to change their behaviour. So reinsulating the loft to save money might float a homeowner's boat, but someone living in rented accommodation is less likely to know how their heating system works, or feel able to do much about it. They might, however, be persuaded to turn down their heating to a lower temperature if they can be convinced that having it too hot is drying out their skin and making them age prematurely (which it is).

The possible solutions to high-carbon behaviours are almost endless, but what almost all of them have in common is that they do not require the consumer to understand the problem they are helping to solve - just as people who bought the iPod probably did not know (or care) that they were reducing the demand for CDs.

The person who puts on a jumper so they can turn down their heating and protect their skin does not need to know how much CO2 they have saved - nor does the person who ditches the car for the bike because they want to be fitter, or the person who takes canvas bags to the supermarket because they have cooler designs and are more comfortable on the fingers than plastic ones.

Whether knowingly or not, Steve Jobs made us all accidental environmentalists, but that was never part of the marketing strategy. We all bought iPods because they were more convenient, beautifully designed and - crucially - because Apple managed to convince us that we would be happier with one than without.

We need to find more green solutions like this for a whole range of behaviours. This presents a much greater creative challenge than simply talking about melting ice caps, carbon calculators or slapping an "eco" label on something. It's time for us all to take inspiration from Steve Jobs and step up to this creative challenge.

 

Follow Chris Deary on Twitter: www.twitter.com/global_cool

Apple is hardly a beacon of environmental good practice, but that doesn't mean Steve Jobs didn't play his part in helping to find a solution to climate change. Climate change does not have an awarene...
Apple is hardly a beacon of environmental good practice, but that doesn't mean Steve Jobs didn't play his part in helping to find a solution to climate change. Climate change does not have an awarene...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:10 on 09/12/2011
well there is one thing the government is going to do to save our planet and its this ,they are going to lower the CO2 numbers for the mot forcing millions to pay even more in road tax by making their cars none compliant with the regulations .all of this will be bought in by 2012 /2013 .

2/ diesel engined vehicles will be forced to have particle filters fitted or face a heavy rise in road tax the fact that it costs a fortune to fit one ,and it has to be emptied at a certified garage 2 or 3 time a year ,and that not all diesels are suitable to have one fitted because their engines are not suitable does not worry the government ,they call this being green anyone else knows its for the money and will cause hyper inflation and misery for millions of over taxed families in this country
10:26 on 09/12/2011
the governments new green tax rip off the E6 regs on vehicles has already started a growth industry firms have started to appear that will cut your particle filter off replace that piece of exhaust, and reprogram your ecu ,this will cost you about £400 but when you consider the money you will save as a result its peanuts ,you will save on the congestion charges going in and out of London you will save on having your vehicle off the road for days when you have to take it to a garage to have the filter stripped down cleaned and assembled ,about 3 times a year dependent on mileage ,and the you have the fuel savings because the filter clogs up your exhaust and cuts down your mpg ,then we have the L.E.Z low emission zones if your vehicle is registered with a filter you wont get fined ,the fact that you took it off a year ago dont matter as long as it was fitted when you had the mot .
Green dont make me laugh its about the MONEY MONEY MONEY ITS ABOUT THE MONEY MONEY !
16:22 on 06/12/2011
Richard Branson, criticizes and admires Steve Jobs. Says “We are completely different.”
http://www.billionairechronicles.net/billionaire-news/branson-on-steve-jobs-%E2%80%9Che-was-completely-different-from-me-%E2%80%9D
15:41 on 06/12/2011
I have no wish, nor intention to organise myself around reducing CO2. As far as I can see, it is a very beneficial gas, and will remain present as a trace component of the atmosphere for the much time to come. We may get back to the highly productive levels of several thousand ppm, but never mind. A level of 1,000ppm would be good enough to give a very appreciable boost to plant life, and from that much good will proceed not least in agricultural productivity. But what about the climate, I hear you cry! Well, all the observational evidence, and some theory, points to CO2 playing a very modest role indeed as a driver of climate. It is far more of a responder than a driver over timescales of tens of thousand of years. As for our recent past, nothing at all out of the ordinary has happened to our climate in the past 100 years or so. As for the future, I think the smart money is on a cooling phase for the next few decades. Oh how we shall long for some 'global warming' if that does happen!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
18:54 on 25/12/2011
ostrich-like
lastpost
see biography
15:07 on 06/12/2011
"Solving Climate Change the Steve Jobs Way"
Did Steve deduce that there was a requirement for a device? Was that requirement devolved to him? Or was there no known requirement, until the product was delivered? We have the means available to us to capitalise on all these possibilities and more. Why not a site where a need or wish for a product can be declared? Accessible from a multitude of platforms. Where tweaks to the specification might be suggested. Hints as to how that item might operate input. A way to vote to indicate potential customer interest added. In order that the desires of the masses might be better met, by companies interesting in finding ideas and a ready made market for new products.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Deary
19:06 on 06/12/2011
If I'm understanding you correctly, you're suggesting crowdsourcing product design? Sounds like a very good idea and I'm pretty sure there are many companies already doing this, e.g. this fashion label - http://www.springwise.com/fashion_beauty/fashion-label-crowdsourcing-design-product-range/ - so there's no reason it couldn't be applied to sustainable products too. There will always be a place for innovators to create products that people didn't know they wanted, though. As Henry Ford once said: "If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses."
13:59 on 06/12/2011
Great! But, could non-consumer-based behavior somehow become cool? What about positive action being cool? A well-designed OWS would have been less polarizing. Could composting and gardening somehow be made stylish? Could taking the bus be made cool? Could green investing be made cool: cute little start-ups with cool dreamy young folks putting together popular and necessary solutions? Could it eventually be cool to "spend the day outside"?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Deary
15:39 on 06/12/2011
Who would've thought a few years ago that knitting would become cool? Of course, whether you can manufacture that coolness, or whether it has to be organic, is another question. I would err towards it being possible to make pretty much anything (or anything legal, anyway) cool, if you find the right incentives and invest enough time, energy and creativity. Oh, and cash helps too! A shoe is basically just a piece of equipment to make walking more comfortable and convenient, but Nike, Adidas etc have done a pretty good job of making it so much more than that - a status symbol, something to aspire to, a source of happiness even. It's all about the marketing.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Deary
10:04 on 06/12/2011
I agree that the financial incentive will work in some situations and for some people - but not in all. Your point about well being is spot on though. However, remember that for some people well being is not derived from saving money, it is derived from spending it. As someone at a conference I was just at put it: we live in a society that believes it has a human right to consume. We have to figure out ways of allowing people to gain that well being from consuming differently.

For example, at Global Cool we ran a campaign to promote Swishing Parties, which is basically swapping clothes with your friends in a fun, social environment rather than going out and buying them. The well being derived from getting a new wardrobe has been satisfied, as has the desire for the social element of shopping with friends - but no extra clothes have been bought from any shops.

For some there my also be a financial incentive to a behaviour like this, but for the type of person who normally buys clothes on credit card, worrying about the consequences later, there is a whole set of different motivations at play.

Thanks for the comment.
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
05:07 on 06/12/2011
Things are changing. Electric cars are becoming more common. Once people gain some familiarity with them, they start to realize that they really aren't that fond of giving lots of their money to the oil companies.

Solar power has become much less expensive and it's getting better all the time. Once people become more familiar with it they soon realize that they aren't that fond of giving lots of their money to the power companies just so they can dump tons of pollution into the air.

These new technologies help the environment, but I think they have an even more profound effect on people's outlook and sense of well being. No longer being dependent on oil companies or power companies is a feeling you have to experience to understand. It a sense of both freedom and empowerment.
15:08 on 09/12/2011
Ok sounds good ,but then you have the government ,there is no money in going green for them take the electric car basically one moving part then look at the thousand or more associated parts in a petrol/diesel car ,everyone of those parts is taxable ,and then the workers who make the parts are taxable, its lost revenue.

you used get a subsidy for solar farms ,that,s gone ,then you used to get a subsidy for having solar panels on your roof that,s gone ,next will be the road tax free electric car that will go,
along with peoples perception that green is good ,because the government is taxing the ***t out of it .this is the dwell time back in 2005 peak oil was reached but the government just forgot to tell us so they had the oil wars ,now they have to have a structure in place for a reliable income ,its called the green structure !