Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Clare Nasir

GET UPDATES FROM Clare Nasir
 

Air Pollution - Britain's Public Health Crisis

Posted: 16/12/2011 00:00

While her colleagues were talking tough on climate change in Durban this week, Caroline Spelman, the UK's Environment Minister, faced problems closer to home.

Her department was in the dock on Tuesday over the appalling state of air pollution in the UK.

DEFRA, the UK's environment ministry, was taken to the High Court by international environmental law firm ClientEarth over its failure to meet legal limits on air quality in 17 regions and cities across Britain.

As the ambassador for the UK's Healthy Air Campaign, I was at the Royal Courts of Justice on Tuesday whilst the judgment was being read. The campaign's manager Lewis Merdler commented on the ruling;

"We have fully supported ClientEarth's legal action against the government for failing to deal with dangerous air pollution across the UK. The judge has stated that the government is in breach of EU law and must act urgently or face the consequences. The real losers in this case are the millions of people affected by air pollution across the country, and the thousands who are dying prematurely every year because of inaction to tackle it."

My grandmother still talks vividly about life in central London before the Clean Air Act of 1956. She describes her children's mouths and noses being caked with soot every morning on bad air days, but also the amazing transformation in the air and their health after the act was passed.

Two things spring to mind after listening to her stories;

Firstly how lucky I initially felt that my two-year-old daughter was not growing up in such conditions, but then how naive I was to think that things have changed that much in 2011.

Back then Britain led the way in public health. Overnight the air became cleaner - after a ban on the offending domestic burnt fuel and tighter regulations on industrial use.

But whereas my grandmother could see and smell the smog that prevented her children from enjoying a walk in the fresh air, the type of pollutant that now hovers in our midst is an invisible and slow killer.

Today 29,000 people die prematurely each year in the UK because of the air they breathe. And evidence is now emerging that high levels of air pollution are stunting the growth of lungs in children.

Over 200 local authorities across the UK have declared air pollution hotspots where people are at a significant risk from either or both of these key pollutants: particulate matter (PM10s) and nitrogen dioxide. PM10s are a nasty collective emitted from vehicle exhausts, they comprise of tiny particles of sulphates, carbon, nitrates and other materials.

When inhaled, PM10s and nitrogen dioxide penetrate deep into the lung tissue. The build up continues over many years, but even on days when levels are high we are oblivious to what damage is going on within the inner realms of our body. Unlike high concentrations of surface level ozone that can result in eye irritations, coughing and other breathing ailments, PM10s don't reveal themselves with any immediate adverse signs. However, later on in life, the onset of asthma, emphysema and other bronchial diseases can lead to early death; it's estimated that this means a staggering average loss of 9 years for those that are exposed to the poorest quality of air.

A recent European study (Aphekom) concluded that those living near main roads in cities could account for some 15-30% of all new cases of asthma in children and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and coronary heart disease of adults aged over 65.

The Healthy Air Campaign's expert on air pollution Ed Dearnley says that it isn't just the young, the sick and the old that suffer from the effects of dirty air. The build up of particulate matter in the lungs takes years, but continual exposure, such as riding a bike to work along busy roads, or exercising in town centres can leave healthy bodies just as vulnerable.

The health impact, work days lost to illness and other social and economic costs of air pollution are similar to obesity or alcohol abuse, but unlike these other two killers the air pollution issue has very little public profile.

With the UK having among the highest frequency of child asthma symptoms worldwide a decisive set of policies to combat air pollution in our towns and cities is essential.

At the very least, we need those in power to recognise the problem and speak up about it. Instead, as Tuesday's High Court hearing showed, we have a government not only failing to comply with European air quality standards, but seemingly willing to accept the likelihood of hefty EU fines as a result.

The former vice president of USA Dan Quayle once said;

"It's not pollution that is harming the environment, it's the impurities in water and air that are responsible."

Whilst David Cameron would never be confused with Dan Quayle in terms of his environmental knowledge, it is time for him to match his awareness of the issues with the leadership we need to tackle this public health crisis.

After all, don't we all have the right to take a stroll down our local high street in the knowledge it won't take years off our lives?

 

Follow Clare Nasir on Twitter: www.twitter.com/clarenasir

FOLLOW UK
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:06 AM on 12/20/2011
yes a couple things struck me as well like this has only surfaced because of the EU directive that comes into play in 2012 /2013 about air quality ,this is where the EU fine England for not meeting the clean act so England gets fined millions of pounds in fines ,this is about the money,its more about the creation of wealth for governments ,has anyone ever done a study into the oceans of money that the government make in direct and indirect taxes on emission equipment and services,eg you whole car tax system is based on emissions ,the government is bringing in the EURO 6 IN 2012 / 2013 this will bring in billions in taxes and put a million cars plus older cars off the roads ,in the hope that it will regenerate the car market ,yes we do need clean air to breath but why is it that the government has to tax the $$$T out of us on route,it should be the reverse there should not be any tax on emission equipment .

look at my car it runs on LPG it runs 80% cleaner than a petrol /diesel and yet the government takes away the slightly cheaper road tax incentive ,people who run there cars on LPG dont pay the 80% tax on petrol /diesel ,so they dont make to much revenue for the government .
05:24 PM on 12/17/2011
It is time to transition to safe clean alternative energy sources. Our economic security and national security will depend on it.

Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from algae, cellulose and waste are the future.
04:51 PM on 12/17/2011
Too many people by far so too many people driving by far but the governments don't care they want the money they just make appropriate noises. Not to worry. The world is in balance because the countries who have lost their people to ours must have their air cleaner. Perhaps we should all move everywhere else! Lets face it if it was of real concern they wouldn't allow any vehicle with an engine bigger than 1000 cc in the country and all speed limits would be no more than 55mph. Most cars seem to like around that speed and settle comfortably to it. No, like I said. They want the money.
11:28 AM on 12/17/2011
Ok i drive an LPG car mainly because its cheaper to run ,it would have been even cheaper but the government took away the green aspect of the road tax ,to me it makes more sense to run it anyway because it is 80% cleaner than petrol/diesel ,yes it still produces CO2 every engine does but the oil stays a lot cleaner so that has to count for something ,the problem i have with the green thing is that the government just use it as a excuse to make money ,the only perk i get is that i dont get charged for driving into London or a L.E.Z [a low emission zone ,as perks go those 2 are useless to me as i never go to London or anywhere near it.

2012 /2013 see,s the EEC deadline for their clean air act and the end of the London loop hole ,the result of this is Euro 6 emission regs for all vehicles these regs will cause hyper inflation as the cost of freighting goods around will go sky high ,i say the London loophole but of course it covers every vehicle in the country ,the government stand to make billions from the regs and the regs will go some way to clean up the air in London but the cost will cause misery for millions !
12:07 PM on 12/17/2011
do you get the feeling that if you found an application for some bit of kit that cut down pollution on a car you get hit by a mack truck ?or die in the process of trying to get the thing on the market ?

When you look at what government make in terms of hard money, taxing emission equipment and services on vehicles it does get scary . example £70 diagnostic /plus sensors /plus fitting all plus vat at 20% times the amount of cars on the road and that runs into billions let alone the road taxes and MOT failures , then all we have to in 2012 /2013 are more regulations point is you can reach point break ,when it becomes an offence to own a vehicle .

with a 38% increase in insurance the result can only be an upsurge in people driving cars without insurance and emission equipment not working ,i think the whole thing needs looking at
before it all crashes :
10:37 AM on 12/17/2011
yes pollution like soot particulates from diesel engines is with out doubt a serious health risk,but why is it that the government use these issues to tax the **** out of us ,yes people drive diesels because of the price of fuel and a diesel gives good mpg ,but we have now reached a point where the government is to bring in what is known as Euro 6 this involves fitting a particle filter the cost is high to fit one and then there are costs involved in having it emptied 2/3 times a year dependent on mileage with all of the bureaucratic certificates and process involved ,then we have the L.E.Z low emission zones ,these are a money maker for the government ,drive into one and if you dont have a filter fitted you get fined ,so we ended up with a diesel engine that does less mpg ,less performance and chokes its self to death and costs a fortune to maintain rendering it as to expensive to maintain !

It looks like its all about the money ,LPG is a cleaner fuel and cheaper ,they were also cheaper to tax ,but the government took that part away ,i expect when even more people go over to lpg the government will tax it the same as petrol /diesel ,by stripping out all of the green allowances as the government is doing people will then see its all about the money:
09:56 AM on 12/17/2011
We have a plating works where we are and the amount of out pouring from the stacks looks like a nuclear advent doubtless the dept of the environment will say its monitored but when your using various acids in the process and then pumping the waste product away into the air on a large scale it makes you wonder just how much is being monitored ,if this is a case of health versus money ,the money always wins !
09:34 AM on 12/17/2011
Yes air pollution does take years off your life,
BUT WHY DOES THE GOVERNMENT KEEP DREAMING NEW WAYS TO TAX US WHEN THEY SHOULD BE TAXING THEIR MATES WHO OWN THE FACTORIES AND THE CARS ,YOU KNOW THE ONES THEY ARE THE ONES WHO MAKE THOSE MASSIVE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE PARTY !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:36 AM on 12/16/2011
ClientEarth another set of Econazis trying to get money from our Government for a Convenient lie. If they win their case £300 million fine is possible. Will ClientEarth/EU spend this money on doing something or will they put into Al Gore and Lord Rothschild's Green Bank account as a tax on the slave tax payers. Next ClientEarth will sue the Government for all the Dihydrogen Oxide in the air.
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
06:12 AM on 12/16/2011
Not before time. When I was a child in West-Berlin in the 1950s I did not hear of one case of asthma. We had very little traffic then, because people had no cars. Truck traffic was not significant, because it was an enclave with no through traffic.

I have often wondered when they will correlate traffic pollution to asthma. One of the worst places I know is in Adelaide, Portrush Road. It is a narrow roadway with thousands of big trucks traversing the continent in a rather windless area. Shocking to see the children wait in diesel clouds for busses. But building a playground for cricket in the city is more more important than a bypass to get the trucks away from the many schools. Stuck in the 1960s.
09:58 AM on 01/01/2012
I agree with what you are saying and with the link with particulates and health it would make common sense but then it would mean that government would have to spend some hard money to improve peoples health ,but it seems that its easier to find ways to tax the trucks than cure the problem ,i mean what do they do with all of that money anyway ?
The whole thing needs a rethink .
when you look at it in the round the government will use a health issue to generate a revenue but do nothing to solve the problem !