Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Fran Singh

GET UPDATES FROM Fran Singh
 

Whitney, Women, Addiction and the Press

Posted: 16/02/2012 23:00

The morning after hearing the news of Whitney Houston's death, I found myself standing in a central London newsagents at 7am audibly swearing next to the front pages of the national newspapers. In the days that have followed my anger has not subsided as the headlines have become more and more ridiculous.

It is perhaps not surprising that what appeared this week was not a dignified tribute to an icon but instead a microscopic autopsy of Houston's last hours, contents of stomach included, and increasingly bizarre backstories. The tabloid press can struggle with journalistic ethics surrounding intrusion into grief at the best of times. With the death of Houston they faced two further tests; writing respectfully about women and responsibly reporting drug addiction. On both counts I think they've failed.

On the surface is hardly out of the ordinary for the gutter press and my upset at the handling of her death can partly be accounted for by bias. I am a mega Whitney fan. You can ask anyone who has heard my 3am rendition of I Have Nothing. But there was more to my dissatisfaction than my own opinions and I kept coming back to those two awkward issues.

Despite the fact that nobody yet knows the cause of death in Houston's case the paper's were quick to decide for themselves. Much like with Amy Winehouse, the reason for her death was considered a given before any official statement was made. "Once an addict, always an addict". It's a lazy and inaccurate portrayal of addiction but one all too often taken up by the popular press.

In "The Media Guide to Drugs" from charity DrugScope, designer, Pearl Lowe detailed how she felt she would always be a "junkie" in the eyes of the media. "I'm a mother of four, I work really hard, I have a successful design business... but the drugs overshadow everything I do, because I'll never be allowed to forget it."

The organisation says that the demonisation of drug users in the media can have a great detrimental effect. While it is important to give true and evidence based accounts of the causes and harms of drug use, sensationalised reporting actually can have a negative impact. You'd think splashing tales of death over the front pages would put people off. Well, according to the research it doesn't and can often have the opposite effect. The UK Drug Policy Commission in its submission to the Leveson Inquiry last month picked up on many of the same points.

They commented: "We are not only concerned with the challenge about the reportage of high-profile public figures... the inaccurate initial press assertions that Amy Winehouse died of a drug overdose, when subsequent toxicology tests showed that alcohol, and not drugs, was implicated in her death. The desire for a sensational headline appeared in her case to outweigh respect for the family and for accuracy about the cause of her death. What also concerns us is the everyday reporting of people who currently have or previously have had drug addiction problems... this stigma makes it even harder for this group to sustain recovery and rebuild their lives as well as making people reluctant to face up to having a problem and seeking help."

Using celebrities and black-and-white reporting of "the downward spiral" of drugs is a bleak tale, that focuses on the immediate harm and pays little attention to treatments, successful rehabilitation and alternative endings. The emphasis on horror stories and forgone conclusion style reporting paints a hopeless picture for anyone who faces addiction. In the case of Houston, one which is no doubt complex with details outsiders will never be fully privy to, do little than give a superficial and simplistic account of the nature of addiction.

What also struck me was how different the tone of the articles were for Houston than other celebrities with similar lifestyles, namely male celebrities. It's unfair to say this kind of extensive and morbid fascination into the intricate details of her death are because she is a woman. Would this have still happened if she was a man? Yes, I imagine it would to a degree. It is not so much the intense scrutiny, though that is part of it, it is the attitude of many of the articles and the elements on which they focus.

There are clearly double standards when it comes to reporting women in relation to drugs. As often is the case with female substance abuse it is seen as much less tolerated both in the press and more widely and this was shown in Houston's case even before her death.

One example is an article in the Sun which fondly remembers the 'legend' and 'macho' actor Oliver Reed. The paper jovially writes: "you can still, almost, hear movie legend Oliver Reed's drunken laughter echoing in the Maltese pub where he died" before listing his last orders like a trophy. A far cry from the zombie, crazy, wasted, wild-eyed (to use some adjectives I've read) Whitney on her "48-hour binge".

Take George Best, John Belushi, Russell Brand and any other boastful male rockstar. Compare and contrast these 'lads' and 'hellraisers' with Courtney Love, Amy Winehouse, Britney Spears and you begin to see a pattern. In their media guide, DrugScope also recognises this in its guide: "Women are often seen as doubly bad if they take drugs." Whitney Houston: Addict, mess, tragic, helpless, doomed. Charlie Sheen: Winning!

Many papers have also rather depressingly begun to ask if Houston was secretly a lesbian. I doubt that if Houston were male so much speculation would have be given to her sexuality being an underlying cause for her problems. Similarly much of the reporting has focused on her daughter, her daughters mental state and the impact of her mother's behaviour. DrugScope again notes this as a another common theme in reporting: "Male drug use is often seen as more acceptable than that of women and mothers, in particular, come in for a lot of criticism if they use drugs. Male drug users who are parents are not usually seen in the same sort of way."

Reading the headlines it is easy to forget the Whitney the public first fell in love with and that voice. Houston was a phenomenally gifted singer, an icon, actress and huge personality. A tribute to the niece, the daugther, the mother may yet grace the front pages when she's buried. Sadly however, I suspect I will be avoiding the newsagents for weeks to come.

 

Follow Fran Singh on Twitter: www.twitter.com/fransingh

FOLLOW UK CELEBRITY
The morning after hearing the news of Whitney Houston's death, I found myself standing in a central London newsagents at 7am audibly swearing next to the front pages of the national newspapers. In the...
The morning after hearing the news of Whitney Houston's death, I found myself standing in a central London newsagents at 7am audibly swearing next to the front pages of the national newspapers. In the...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 49
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robjh1
We Have Met the Enemy and he is Us: Pogo
08:16 PM on 02/20/2012
Interesting observation.
photo
one1byke
Easy no Man.
05:52 PM on 02/19/2012
they do keep it REAL dumb.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elizabethjl
09:40 PM on 02/18/2012
Nobody is perfect, everyone has their demons, their problems, their worries and concerns, and everybody deals with these in their own way, who are we to judge Whitney or anyone else, my husband thinks that we shouldn't feel sorry for people who have it all, and sink into the life that they do, I personally don't feel like this, it makes me sad that addiction affects everyone rich or poor, successful or not, and I think that where stars like Whitney are concerned, that nobody will stand up to them and tell them the truth to their faces, because this person pays them ££££££'s of pounds every week, and they dont want to lose their jobs by telling it like it is, so they can just carry on abusing themselves, if any of those people that were their today, truly loved her, they would of forced her earlier to deal with her problems, not let her carry on, and yes I know that maybe they did, but they will all be thinking, did we try hard enough!! RIP Whitney,
12:33 PM on 02/18/2012
She had an addiction, which ever the type, it was obvious from her recent photos that she wasn't looking after herself, she was no different to any other addict who clearly chose her addiction over her daughter, and has left her daughter without a mother. Just because she had a good voice and was famous, and believed in god, didn't make her any better than the average junkie who chose their addiction over their children. She had the money and the means to do it if she'd wanted to, but was obviously too selfish to change. Its her daughter I feel sorry for, I'm just glad Amy Winehouse never had kids.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kellybelle22
Medicine. Marriage. Motherhood.
05:31 AM on 02/18/2012
Fran, please know that Otay Panky is correct below. I can affirm that because I'm studying for a mid-career new medical board certification in neuro-psychiatry, which includes the field of addiction disease.

Once an addict, always an addict, at least neurologically. It IS a lifelong condition. That doesn't mean that addicts are doomed always to use. Their brains and physical health are far better served by sobriety. But, just as with any other pre-existing medical condition, that propensity is there, and re-exposure to illicit drugs, alcohol, prescription painkillers, tranquilizers and even, for some, grass and nicotine can quickly re-ignite that predisposition and result in cravings for more, along with myriad other craziness. Plenty of addicts don't like to hear this, but it's a fact.

There is a huge difference between an addict in recovery and one who is still using. So while there may be defensiveness about the characterization of once a junkie, always a junkie on the part of long-recovering people--that's a very important distinction, by the way; they're recovering, not recovered--it's incumbent upon recovering junkies to embrace their propensity and use that as part of their daily fight against slips and relapses.

Whitney couldn't really do that. She went to rehab twice, but sobriety hadn't yet won out over her battle with substances. This doesn't mean she wasn't immensely talented; she was. She also just happened to have a deadly neurological disease that was activated by her behavior of using.
06:28 PM on 02/18/2012
She was f*8cked over by her Management and anyone who tied her into contracts worth billions of dollars... .The ones who are responsible for the grotesque public dispaly of her funeral, with the final humiliation, Kevin Costner speaking at it...How much brains does it take to work out, this is directly to raise the profile of The Bodyguard and its remake.. get real people.. Illegally download her music and films and dont line the Pockets of Clive Davis and his Pilchard friends....You think Whitney going anywhere, even to the toilet alone, let alone Rehab was left to chance when she was worth so much money????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OtayPanky
You're welcome
01:29 AM on 02/18/2012
The only recent substance abuse related death of a star of Whitney's magnitude would be MJ - and from what I can see he got the same sort of media treatment. So I'm not buying the feminist rant here.

Further, the blogger writes, "In the case of Houston, one which is no doubt complex with details outsiders will never be fully privy to, do little than give a superficial and simplistic account of the nature of addiction."

Nonsense, really. Go ask any addiction specialist, including the ones you'll find at any AA or NA meeting: Once a person has gotten firmly caught in the cycle of addiction, everything depends on not using those substances again. Those who stay away completely from drugs (legal or not) or alcohol, have a real good chance of rebuilding their lives and moving on. Those who indulge, have a real good chance of succumbing to their addiction. Why? Because the neural pathways of addiction are there - and they can be fired up again at any time.

Will the press go overboard? Of course. That's what the press does.

Is it good to talk about these tragic deaths anyway? Of course it is. If even one person is persuaded to live a sober life as a result, then Whitney didn't die entirely in vain.

If you're truly an addict or alcoholic, and you continue to use, you WILL die from your disease. It really is as simple as that, ultimately. Everything else is just a
10:16 PM on 02/17/2012
Cannot believe it after only a day of saying I will be watching the fate of Adele very closely, already I have found two articles one about her spitting in her dads face, and the other alleged sex tapes.. Unbelievable.. Chuck these poor souls a few Grammies, then watch their reputation fall into disrepute until they are certain the public opinion is against them to such a degree, the industry can bump them off without issue, get a doctor or bf involved, blame them and bump them off without suspicion or public outrage... Simple,, however there are people who aren't sheep who can work it out...it has been less than a week though with Adele, less than a week 6 Grammies, 5 days later media campaign of disrepute... Utterly astonishing in its transparency..
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
08:53 PM on 02/17/2012
I am old enough to remember many deaths of 'Star performers' who have been claimed through drink, drugs or outrageous personal foibles. (Think Michael Hutchence)
I see no difference in the way the media have portrayed the death of Whitney Houston compared with the death of any male in a similar industry.
I do have problems with the way this article seems to claim that female performers who die early are treated differently. There is no compassion in a good story, no empathy in a headline!
Fran Singh seems to be trying to take feminism to a new level.
Or maybe she is writing in a cloud of grief!
10:24 PM on 02/17/2012
Women are treated differently or do you say that from your male ivory tower perspective??? How are males perceived by the media?? Sleeping with women, being ' hard'.. Look at pictures of Beyonce, Rhianna, Britney Spears,Christina Aguilera, every young women in the music industry.. Have you seen their promotional videos??? They have next to nothing on... And basically treated as sex symbols.. Do we see Chris Martin in videos such as these??? Come on.. Keep it real....
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
03:40 PM on 02/18/2012
So you have never seen Male pop stars without their shirts on- or wearing shorts- What about Wham, George Michael, Peter Andre- What about the way Elvis performed.
I look at the reality and I agree that many pop stars are treated as sex symbols (Exploited) But I wouldn't feel sorry for any of them- they know what they are doing!
08:19 PM on 02/17/2012
Some interesting thoughts in the comments section, but I enjoyed reading this, and agree with you. I Need the "like" button!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:58 PM on 02/17/2012
This is the media today. There are no barriers. Freedom of the Press is freedom without an iota of decency and morals. The media and its army of henchmen and women are a breed that are like pariah dogs each feeding off the filth and refuse of humanity. There are a few journos who still abide by the ethics of journalism, the rest sell their souls for a dollar. So what is surprising about the news reports of Whitney's last hours. This is to be expected from the gutter Press.
04:28 PM on 02/17/2012
"Charlie Sheen Winning!" WTF? I think you missed the irony.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Fran Singh
06:39 PM on 02/17/2012
I got the irony. But the focus on Sheen was much more light hearted. Less speculation on his parenting. Passed off as a joke
11:12 AM on 02/20/2012
i thought sheen was treated as a joke. sad, slightly amusing in a "we really shouldn't laugh" kind of way, but essentially pathetic and highly deluded. maybe i was reading different stories. maybe you've got a barrow to push.
03:53 PM on 02/17/2012
Oh, please: this has gone on for decades! Do the names Judy Garland, Edith Piaf, Billie Holliday and Marilyn Monroe ring a bell? All were talented ladies who died from drug-related problems (and had numerous problems in their lives), yet they are still lauded today for their great artistry.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Fran Singh
06:45 PM on 02/17/2012
Yes, I know it has. It isn't particularly out of the ordinary. I am sure as time goes by attention will go back to her artistry. However in the meantime this type of reporting does have an impact, not on her legacy, but on the way people view issues like addiction
08:28 PM on 02/17/2012
Of course it's gone of decades.. Do you think these people really had any control over their lives when signing contracts worth billions of dollars??? Do you actually think their media representation was real and truthful? if you actually think the stars you mention had any control over their day to lives you must aso believe in fairies at the bottom of your garden...
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Fran Singh
09:13 PM on 02/17/2012
I'm really not sure I see the point you are making.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
What's the story mourning Tories?
03:32 PM on 02/17/2012
Less said more good, I think is the phrase. How a bunch of pundits relying on the shaky and sensationalist reporting on a celeb thinks they can form any opinion on their private life is beyond me. Whitney had her problems that we can be sure of, but as to why and to what extent is the area we know little for sure but the area where the conversation is. Most speak with far too much certainly, and it's all idle speculation at best.

There are no cautionary tales to be told here beyond that fact that it's another giant permanantly enamored our culture who died before their time due probably due to emotional distress. To hold anyone dead celeb up as a case against drug abuse is cold hearted oppurtunism. We dont use our literary giants as examples against suicide.
08:32 PM on 02/17/2012
The woman was worth millions and millions of dollars, do you think any media representation of his was accurate or wasnt manipulated?? Do you not think for one small minute someone who was worth that much to an industry would even be allowed a trip to the bathroom alone??? Let alone 'decide' to choose a rapscallion boyfriend/Take drugs and become a shambles??? People worth that much money have had their life choices taken away from them the minute they sign the multi million dollar deal.. You must be deluded to think otherwise
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
What's the story mourning Tories?
04:44 PM on 02/18/2012
You have misunderstood what I said or replied to the wrong person. I kinda agree with you, minus the conspiracy, but I'm glad you stopped short at blaming it on Jews or an agenda against the black community.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JTWallace
02:38 PM on 02/17/2012
The media has spent one-hour shows accepting calls from viewers for their opinion of the ''death of an icon''. Good grief. She was an entertainer. Not someone who gave to the world other than what she was, an entertainer. Media whether newspaper, television, or cyber net, is all about controversy. Yeah, she was an addict, No, she didn't rob banks, or other misdemeaners. But, flags at half mast? She died a doped up addict, broke and lost her voice in the process. However, Michael Jackson, Elvis Pressley, and others got the same celebrity, garish send off. All drug addicts. They were entertainers only. Definitely not ions. Leave them to the good memories, not their accomplished failure.
12:03 PM on 02/17/2012
Find a young talented( female)singer that is just starting on the road to fame and is being courted by the press and please ask her to shy away from the attention.

Then please report her attitude to us.
08:42 PM on 02/17/2012
Actually please ask her to stay the f@@k away from Simon Cowell and Clive Davis, the publicity shots of Leona Lewis after being ' handed over' we're scary.. Like someone switched the light out of her eyes.. I will be watching the media fates of Jessie J/Adele and Leona very closely... They chuck a load of Grammies at them, make a fortune out of them for a year or so then, surprise surprise media campaign begins of how they are a mess/on drugs/in the grip of a a controlling bf.. Btw wonder where who introduced them to these bf.s or did they just meet them in Starbucks? Then surprise surprise they get bumped off somewhere in a hotel room surrounded by ' shock horror
' prescription drugs... I wish they could come up with another form of death, I am so bored by the prescription drugs things... Overkill...let's just watch Sony/Clive Davis and his pilchard friends rake in the cash from the remake of the bodyguard/ her film she had just finished... Oh JUST finished.. That was handy... And her back catalogue.. I am surprised at the amount of sheep out there who believe this rubbish..
08:16 AM on 02/18/2012
Thats my point, women have allowed this pressure to build at the WHIM of MEN.
08:44 PM on 02/17/2012
Btw people don't just contact and court the press themselves.. Their management/agents industry execs do...It is not done by the artists.. Under the terms of their contracts they are highly unlikely to even be able to send a text without someone looking at it first. You are very naive..