iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hanna Flint

GET UPDATES FROM Hanna Flint
 

Are the Kardashians the Modern Day Bennets?

Posted: 11/10/2012 00:00

I can hear you snigger, and yes even I find it difficult to put Kardashian in the same sentence as one of literature's greatest familial creations. But when part of my job is to document the activities of Kim, Khloe, Kourtney, Kendall and Kylie I can't help but see the similarities between the Ks and the Bs.

And I don't just mean that there are five sisters in each clan.

Last week some pictures of Kylie Jenner landed on my desk and I was asked to write a fashion story on the outfit she wore to a Justin Bieber concert. The just turned 15-year old was wearing skin-tight red leather trousers a (lacy) bra-exposing black vest and stilettos.

I certainly didn't see outfits like that in the Tammy girl window when I was 15.

The reality family's youngest member has been rocking a number of these age-inappropriate outfits, with the news angle suggesting she's emulating her older sister Kim. But when I look at Kylie dressed up as a woman twice her age, I can't help but see Lydia Bennet.

The youngest of the Bennet sisters, she constantly tries to compete with her elder siblings through the fashionable items she covets and the attention of men she seeks. And what was Polite Society of those times if not the reality show of ours, with men and women constantly under the spotlight, being scrutinised for every fashion choice, every comment and every relationship for the ultimate prize of social status.

Societal breeding has been usurped by celebrity as the social currency of today, and with the Kardashians domination of reality TV their shares are unworthily high. So it's not surprising that the young Kylie and Kendall - daughters of Kris Jenner's second husband Bruce - wanted to join Team K and reap the materialistic rewards that come with exposing your personal life to public scrutiny.

And with this, I think back to Austen and Lizzy Bennet's retort to Lady Catherine De Burgh who finds it 'very odd' that all five sisters are out in society at once:

'But really, Ma'am, I think it would be very hard upon younger sisters, that they should not have their share of society and amusement because the elder may not have the means or inclination to marry early. The last born has as good a right to the pleasures of youth, as the first. And to be kept back on such a motive! I think it would not be very likely to promote sisterly affection or delicacy of mind.'

Ok, maybe the elder sisters have more than a few marriages under their belt, but the sentiment is the same. However, in today's world of Twitpics and Paparazzi there are more opportunities for our younger siblings to expose themselves than in pre-technological revolution England.

For me, one of the most striking similarities is between the matriarchs of the factual and fictional families.

Mrs Bennet is an overbearing, over-sharing social climber of a mother, hell bent on getting her daughters married off to the most eligible bachelor.

Swap the arranged marriages for superficial business deals and public appearances and you've pretty much summed up Kris Jenner to a tee. Not to mention her husband Bruce acting just as passively as Mrs Bennet's other half.

And Rob - I'm sorry - that makes you Mr Collins, who is 'not a sensible man, and the deficiency of nature had been but little assisted by education or society.'

Not a bad shout then.

But when Austen wrote Pride and Prejudice nearly 200 years ago, she wasn't praising the pursuit of social elevation and wealth but actually attacking it, as well as ineffectual parents failing to guide their children onto the right path.

And if memory serves (it should - I've ready the novel several times) young Lydia ignorantly falls into a slapdash marriage that will lead to her eventual unhappiness, no thanks to her complacent mother and father.

Kim has already suffered two failed marriages and a sex tape scandal and Kourtney has struggled with her partner Scott's wandering eye.

So the way Kylie's going there's not much stopping her from following in he sisters' footsteps.

Therefore maybe it's not too much of a stretch to consider the Kardashian clan as the modern day Bennet family, but for the sake of the youngest members let's hope it's not too late to rewrite their story.

 

Follow Hanna Flint on Twitter: www.twitter.com/hannaines

FOLLOW CELEBRITY
 
 
  • Comments
  • 118
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniel Kauwe
i like stuff except when i do not
03:23 on 25/11/2012
when will the hurting stop!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
19:51 on 16/10/2012
Flint finally gets to use her English degree . It's just wrong to mention Pride And Prejudice and the k's in the same breath.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Deborah Beck
Say What?
17:23 on 14/10/2012
Ouch, this hurts my sense and sensibilities!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Gary Amedee
Mea Culpa. Mea Maxima Cruenta Culpa
02:18 on 14/10/2012
Do you think there may be something more constructive to do with your life than to write about people who do not deserve to be written about? You should have more respect for your education.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
19:49 on 16/10/2012
Gary, don't you think there should be more meaningful things to to criticize other than people that write about people that don't deserve to be written about.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Gary Amedee
Mea Culpa. Mea Maxima Cruenta Culpa
01:25 on 17/10/2012
yes
01:23 on 14/10/2012
How dare this woman try to ruin my favorite literary character by comparing her to Kim Kardashian!! Kim has no class, no wit, and no pride.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sabelmouse
i love to tumble , ask me why .
12:22 on 13/10/2012
is their fortune entailed through the male line ? is the second sister exceptionally intelligent and sensible ?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ladislasdehoyos
22:32 on 12/10/2012
This family should be sterilized.
pavementends42
Laugh at everything, apologize if it's inappropria
19:40 on 11/10/2012
Wouldn't one of the daughters have to be both beautiful AND intelligent for this to work? lol
18:05 on 11/10/2012
It is an entertaining comparison.

Perhaps next time it can be published after being checked for grammar.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
19:57 on 16/10/2012
Here on HP we check for spelling & grammar ourselves. It helps to keep discerning standards and a sharp mind :)
17:55 on 11/10/2012
Actually the Kardashians are the modern-day Boelyns.
14:27 on 12/10/2012
Wonderful analogy!
17:33 on 11/10/2012
As the writer of this article pointed out, Jane Austen "wasn't praising the pursuit of social elevation and wealth but actually attacking it". Although the Bennet story may be compared to the Kardashians, it is still a stretch. For example, 200 years ago inheritance laws played a major role in Ms. Austen's novel. Only a male heir would inherit property. Thus, Mrs. Bennet's concern to marry off her five daughters is justified. In addition, although Lydia, Kitty and even Mary could be compared to the superficial Kardashians, Jane and Elizabeth are the direct opposites. So, I wholeheartely agree with Ms. Flint. It is very difficult to see "Kardashian" in the same sentence with "Bennet".
16:06 on 11/10/2012
I think the writer did a good job with this piece. Yes, a little stretch with the comparison, but well written. We have created a young society of thugs with the Kardashians leading the pack. I pity the fans of this greedy, low-class family. Many will be future welfare moochers due to their lack of developed values and vicarious living through the Kardashians..which IS NOT reality at all. Sexuality for money, which the K Klan promotes, sends women back to the dark ages. There is a lot of blame to go around however relative to the absence of social responsibility and dumbing down of America...the media (especially Ryan Seacrest) parents,
advertisers, and the FCC.
15:41 on 11/10/2012
An insult to poor Ms. Austen. The Karda$hians are nothing more than this generation's Gabors: pretty girls of dubious marketable talents, trained by their mother to trap rich husbands. One may end up on a sitcom with a pig, the others will wile away their golden years on game shows.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HudsonGal
14:55 on 11/10/2012
Oh god I hope not, it's the end of the world as we know it!
PhillipCollins
not the singer from Genesis
14:40 on 11/10/2012
If I was Bruce Jenner, I'd have to be taking some serious narcotics to live in the same house as that tribe.