Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Judi Sutherland

GET UPDATES FROM Judi Sutherland
 

On Being a Spiritual Atheist

Posted: 17/12/2012 00:00

The 2011 census results were interesting, weren't they? The rising trend of atheism was a key finding, with 25.1% now saying that we have "no religion" versus 14.8% of us in 2001. As ever, I'm completely on trend, having been an atheist for almost thirty years.

A mistake that many people make is to imagine that atheists are shallow materialists, because, logically, if you don't believe that an old man in the sky sees your every misdemeanour and punishes you accordingly, then why would you adhere to any moral code all? St Paul said, quoting Ecclesiastes: 'If the dead are not raised, "Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die."' In fact, many of the atheists I've met are thoughtful, moral and even spiritual people; a real force for good.

I've heard spirituality defined as 'the need to connect with something greater than ourselves'. For some people, that greater thing is nature, for others, community, and for a third group, it is personified as a deity. Jedi Knights (390,000 in the 2001 census there were; data for 2011, find I cannot) would presumably call it the Force.

It seems to me that every religion has two major strands: a pile of aggregated mythology that is cult-specific and reaches from creation myths to the ultimate fate of the 'soul'; and a core of compassionate altruism and self-knowledge that helps us live with each other and with ourselves. The second strand I count as spirituality and I am all for it. I've learnt a little bit of it from other people, from my own reading, from management courses and psychometric tests, from reading Buddhist texts and books by Karen Armstrong... all sorts of sources, and I am still a beginner. I'm not saying that I apply compassion and self-knowledge easily or well.

I make mistakes, although nobody punishes me but myself. But I have seen many committed Christians whose morals, attitudes, words and actions are so far from their avowed ideals that they have made me disbelieve in their God, who obviously is not helping them to live any kind of good life. I suspect many other people in this country feel the same, which is a partial explanation for a quarter of us having no religion.

If I had to clothe that spirituality in my own mumbo-jumbo, I could say that there is some sense in a Pagan world view. There really isn't anything much more deserving of our reverence than the sun, the stars, the moon, the earth - they give us our life and a sense of awe. I am pretty sure they weren't created by a god or goddess, but there they are, sustaining us, and its wonderful even if it isn't purposeful. It's no use praying to them though, as I don't think they have the capacity to listen or act on our behalf.

It stops you in your tracks, sometimes, being an atheist. You realise that there is no higher power for good, or evil, in this world, and that, excepting natural disasters, that it is down to us humans to do all the nice or nasty things that are ever going to happen. The fact that so many people do choose to do some good in the world, even though they have no religion, or only a nominal one, is thrilling. I expect we do it because it actually makes us feel good. Maybe because we are a successful tribe of social monkeys, our brains are wired that way.

The implication of St Paul's letter to the Christians at Corinth, quoted above, is that if we don't believe in God, an afterlife, and a reward in heaven or an eternity in hell, then we can do what we like, with impunity. For religious people, it's best to keep the rules just in case. It's a belief system underpinned by the ultimate threat. But when an atheist does a good thing, he or she does so for its own sake, not for any harp lessons in heaven. That's why I think atheists are some of the most spiritual people I know.

 

Follow Judi Sutherland on Twitter: www.twitter.com/judi_sutherland

FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE
The 2011 census results were interesting, weren't they? The rising trend of atheism was a key finding, with 25.1% now saying that we have "no religion" versus 14.8% of us in 2001. As ever, I'm compl...
The 2011 census results were interesting, weren't they? The rising trend of atheism was a key finding, with 25.1% now saying that we have "no religion" versus 14.8% of us in 2001. As ever, I'm compl...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:23 AM on 12/19/2012
If I had to honestly name my best employers/paymasters they would include (in order of employment), Mr. and Mrs. Tillman (a non-churchgoer and a devout Baptist), Mr. Espada (a Catholic former mob associate), Mrs. Cooke ( a devout Presbyterian), Mr. Schwartz (an elderly former cat burglar with organised crime ties that was Jewish by ancestry only),and Mr. and Mrs. Butler (an atheist and a devout Catholic). The Tillmans employed me to finish house details and Mr. E. as a housekeeper during college. Mrs. Cooke supervised me in the campus registrar's office. Mr. Schwartz hired me as an evening cashier in his gift shoppe to supplement my small salary as a teacher. The Butlers secured proposal writing work for me when support staff in schools were reduced to part-time. Four of them had little religious ties, yet they were better human beings than many who profess religion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:13 PM on 12/18/2012
When I was a kid I was made to go to church,
I dont believe in God or Jesus son of God, but do believe there is good and bad places when we die,
People are good and bad and in the spirit world there is good places and bad places, but no God,
Foreget God, forget Jesus, it's all fiction,
I'm now in my 40s and have seen spirits, only one spirit spoke to me, my great Nan,
Warning me about my anticks when I was a teenager,
Ever since that incounter I've seen 3 more, 4 in all, only people who have seen spirits will believe in the spirit world. my great Nan came to me why'll I was in bed one night, the rest have just appeared and then disapeared, you turn round and their there, then you blink and their gon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
08:10 AM on 12/18/2012
Fully agree with that. You don't need to indulge in fantasy beliefs that would not pass the test qualifying for a Z-list movie scenario to be a civil person.

The law is in place and it is what matters not a guidance/code written in a book of uncertain origin, whose interpretation is changing and lagging over time and due to unaccountable self-elected old guy.
06:47 AM on 12/18/2012
To quote G. K. Chesterton, "When people stop believing in God, they don't believe in nothing - they believe in anything."

Chesterton's prediction has rather come true, as illustrated by the above article. Religion at least provides some kind of framework for considering metaphysical and moral questions. That framework is usually more substantial, worked-out and flexible than the uninitiated imagine. Of course, some considerable work needs to be put in. In the end it's impossible or unsatisfying to avoid such questions and religion provides a space for their exploration and shows paths that others have followed. There's also something to be said for connecting with and participating in your own cultural traditions. I suppose the main advantage of DIY is you can make your system of belief as lightweight, as partial, and as internally inconsistent as you like.

There's an interesting TED Talk given by the atheist philosopher, Alaine de Botton, in which he tries to correct what he concedes are the spiritual deficiencies of Atheism by proposing a new system, which he call Atheism 2.0. (search for 'atheism' on TED.com). He ends up in territory that most religious people would find entirely familiar. I'm not sure he fully understands that if you take any philosophical system and add a metaphysical aspect, what you end up with is religion. What Alaine de Botton mostly reveals is how little he knows what religion actually is, even though he defines himself antithetically in relation to it.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judi Sutherland
04:15 PM on 12/18/2012
I think we are born with an innate sense of good and evil. You don't have to teach a kid to say 'it's not fair' and they know from quite an early age when they are doing something naughty. I believe we can be ethical without being religious. I think that the mythology of religion and the core teaching of compassion are separate. That's the philosophy without the metaphysics.
04:00 AM on 12/19/2012
I'm not sure about an innate sense of good and evil, at least in the sense of which of the two it might be better to choose, although I agree that a sense of injustice seems innate, even in children. However, 'help your friends and hurt your enemies' also seems to be innate, as does 'the end justifies the means' and then there's the old dispute about the laws of nature versus human laws. In the end, we seem to require something beyond ourselves - something transcendental - to act as authority on what it is to be human. Most philosophers seem to arrive at the this conclusion to some degree or another. I'm not sure we can have philosophy without metaphysics unless we agree with Ayer that the only proper province of philosophy is logic. Or, as Wittgenstein put it, 'Of that which we cannot speak, it is better to remain silent.' Against this we have Plato, who would probably regard Ayer's musings as something akin to a craft (say, for example, like making bread) - a practice unworthy of the term philosophy. Remember that Plato did not describe dialectics as the practice of arriving at knowledge, but as the practice of arriving at knowledge about important things. Religion makes the same claim. I does not only answer the question of what is good and what is evil, but also what makes them different and why we must choose one over the other. 
07:12 PM on 12/17/2012
The world would be a far better place, although a little more crowded, if the whole concept of 'religion' and all its baggage had never been invented.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
08:12 AM on 12/18/2012
i would say less crowded. for sure without religion there would not have been millions of death in the history of humanity. But without the families of 10 to 12 children for religious reasons we would be a much less crowded place with better education for all.
10:35 AM on 12/18/2012
A valid point, Jess. I was thinking of the doubtless millions that have met their ends in wars and other unpleasantnesses that have occurred in the name of 'religion'.
06:53 PM on 12/17/2012
Pagans (and other theists) give reverence to the sun, the stars, the moon, and the earth because they accept that these are 'beings' with consciousness. If you don't go in for that sort of thing, then your world view can't in any way be called "spiritual". Thinking the sun, moon, etc. are lifeless accidents and still revering them is at best a sort of whimsical quirk.

You can certainly be ethical and morally engaged without any spiritual belief, but to be spiritual means that you accept that their is metaphysical awareness.

There are lots of spiritual people who do not practice any organised religion. Bit of a stretch to call them atheists, though.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judi Sutherland
04:17 PM on 12/18/2012
I don't mind being whimsical! But I did say in the article that the definition of spirituality was the need to connect with something greater than ourselves, and that not all such greater things have to be deities. I'm sticking with that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
06:35 PM on 12/17/2012
I'm very much looking forward to seeing what the UK is like in 50 years when the vast majority of us are atheists. I wonder what changes we will make?
lastpost
see biography
03:20 PM on 12/17/2012
“Being a Spiritual Atheist”
surely requires belief in belief. As an atheist already has faith, that they’re in possession of the
all-knowing faculty. Which only an entity, that they know for certain doesn’t exist, would possess.

“logically, if you don't believe that an old man in the sky sees your every misdemeanour and punishes you accordingly, then”
said logic could contain an unexplained presumption. That original sin is a reality, and thus the default setting.

“why would you adhere to any moral code all?”
Might it be the application of a more logical logic? While the avoidance of punishment might be one incentive. Isn’t seeking more efficient ways rather than accepting inefficient ones, also a motivation?

"Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die."
Just as those before us did? Without so much as a thought, as to what might follow.

“the need to connect with something greater than ourselves”
has already been accomplished, on our behalf. Without it, where would any of us be? Apart from grovelling in the dirt.

“Jedi Knights”
imagination-fuelled days.

“every religion has two major strands”
The stick and the carrot. Until the donkey figures it out, those may well do the trick.

“many committed Christians”
join for the fringe benefits? If a teacher doesn’t know their subject, how can they make sense of it to someone else? When two or more different views of supposedly the same scene are reported, there must be questions concerning what’s being looked at.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judi Sutherland
04:19 PM on 12/18/2012
In response to your first point. Yes, it is a 'belief' of mine that there is no God. That's perfectly rational given the evidence I've seen. It is not, however, a 'faith', which is the belief in something without any evidence.
02:40 PM on 12/17/2012
I think many people confuse atheism with nihilism and therefore view it as an amoral anti-religious stand point. Their judgments couldcome from either a lack of understanding of the meaning of the word or perhaps from belonging to a religous family who have an 'us and them' attitude towards fellow believers and the rest of the world. Not all religous people think this way, but it's a shame that the ones who do think this way tend to shout the loudest.

For me, there is enough beauty in the physical world for me to worship, without having to worry about the metaphysical. Finding my way through this world might be easier with a divine handbook, but isn't it more fun not to know and to work it out by referrencing as many handbooks as possible?
This comment has been removed.
photo
Livia Ellis
Author of the bestselling Memoirs of a Gigolo
01:31 PM on 12/17/2012
When I started to study Theology from a secular point of view at university I was suddenly freed to no longer believe in god. My life is richer and more fulfilled now that I am accountable to myself for my actions and not to some imaginary boss. This article really got it right. Do right and be good because that is the best thing to do. Not because the boogey man is going to get you.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judi Sutherland
04:21 PM on 12/18/2012
Thank you! I agree with you that the sense of accountability is important.
photo
vividrick
I came, I saw...I had a cup of tea!
01:19 PM on 12/17/2012
I too regard myself as a "spiritual Atheist".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
godsamyth
10:58 AM on 12/17/2012
I,m an atheist and I used to very spiritual, whisky vodka gin ouzo schnaps now i,m polishing my broomstick just in case i,m needed in heaven
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Philip J Sparrow
When your work speaks for itself, keep quiet
09:28 AM on 12/17/2012
Personally, I hate the word 'spiritual'. Not only does it come with all sorts of metaphysical mumbo-jumbo but people seem to make up their own definition for it according to whatever suits then, rendering it essentially meaningless.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judi Sutherland
04:22 PM on 12/18/2012
Yep, I kind of did that. But I am not sure what else to call it - maybe the 'ethical atheist'?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Philip J Sparrow
When your work speaks for itself, keep quiet
07:49 PM on 12/18/2012
Atheist with a conscience. 
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mette Poynton
07:22 AM on 12/17/2012
I love this post... it completely describes how I feel about religion and lack thereof!! Thank You xx
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judi Sutherland
07:18 PM on 12/18/2012
Thank you, Mette!
06:25 AM on 12/17/2012
Really nice post, well done. I actually think that human beings are innately moral and that religion has built on this innate morality, eventually claiming it. Why do I think this? If we consider very early humans, we would not have survived very long if we kept killing each other. To survive we had to work together or we would never have conquered the natural world. Those who developed this innate morality prospered. I find this much more believable than a "benevolent" deity who presumably intentionally created a planet incapable of supporting human life on between 75 to 85% of its surface. I should stop there but I also get a giggle from the idea that the same intelligence that created the need to drink water to survive deposited us on a planet covered by oceans filled with water we can not drink!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:53 AM on 12/17/2012
The first glimmerings of morality came with self conciousness and then we began to seperate from the instictive animal world. We are ruled to a large extent by survival of the fittest most of the world starves and wars rage thoughtout history.
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
11:00 AM on 12/17/2012
It's also a giggle that this deity let human civilisation flourish and expand for over 10,000 years before finally deciding his creation was sinful - some omniscience. Then deciding it could only be saved by the blood sacrifice of his only son. The deciding that, rather than revealing himself to an established civilisation that already had culture and writing, like the Chinese, he would make his grand appearance to a primitive goat herding culture in the middle east. Lucky for them Constantine decided to adopt their religion during the later stages of the Roman Empire, or it would have stayed obscure.

All very laughable, but so many people have swallowed it without a second thought.