Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kit Vaughan

GET UPDATES FROM Kit Vaughan
 

Rio+20: Game Over for Our Planet?

Posted: 22/06/2012 00:00

Today it's raining outside, for the first time since I am here in Rio de Janeiro. The heat has broken but the fog remains. Helicopters are circling above us at the UN Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) and security is very tight with police and military everywhere as the world's heads of state begin to arrive.

Delegates and participants at Rio+20 now number above 30,000. The atmosphere has picked up, the food courts are full and there is no spare space to sit, charge a laptop or take a break. The media are here with their cameras up and the place is buzzing. But here is the thing: There is little to report about. Journalists keep asking what the story is. There is a story but it's a very dark one and in our hearts everybody is looking for a ray of sunshine from Rio+20. But there are worrying signs of the very real and severe failure of the negotiations.

Stripped of ambition and substance

The Brazil government and its negotiating team have railroaded the negotiations to finalise an outcome text last night for heads of state to sign-off. But there have been complaints from many countries that the Brazilians have pushed the process too far so it has been stripped of any ambition and substance.

A senior negotiator from the UK delegation team stated that "there is almost nothing left now for the heads of state to negotiate and it's almost a done deal. But the real problem is this isn't a deal that anyway near addresses what we need." From analysing the text it's clear that the deal, as it stands right now, is a black hole of low ambition and little urgency. And we are all worrying that the black hole is gathering pace.

No new sources of finance

It's not just the Brazilians who bear responsibility. Leaders of the world's major economies came to Rio empty-handed with nothing to offer; no (financial) commitments and a dire lack of leadership. The current outcome text provides no clear targets for reducing climate emissions or reversing environmental degradation, there are no legally binding commitments and - more worrying - no new sources of finance. Without these elements as a foundation the Rio+20 outcome will be an epic failure on a planetary scale.

The science is clear: we can't continue to grow our economies by gobbling up and depleting our stocks of natural capital, be it for example fish, carbon or water. We are undermining the very foundation of our planetary survival and its natural capital. Increasingly the impacts of climate change and resource degradation are severely impacting the world's poorest and most vulnerable people. If we don't urgently tackle climate change as well as other environmental issues we will reverse development gains and lock out future generations from the development choices they so urgently need in order to escape from poverty.

Only two days left

But there is a slim chance to make a huge difference, if just a few world leaders could demonstrate bold political leadership and state that they are not happy to commit the planet to an unsustainable future and many millions more people to a future of grinding poverty. Without tackling climate change and poverty reduction there will be no sustainable future. Whether Rio+20 will be game over for the planet remains to be seen.

There is just one day left until the conference closes Friday evening. One day for leaders to act and deliver a roadmap for a sustainable future, and I just hope they have the courage and determination to deliver the future we want rather than the future we can't live with.

 
FOLLOW UK TECH
Today it's raining outside, for the first time since I am here in Rio de Janeiro. The heat has broken but the fog remains. Helicopters are circling above us at the UN Conference on Sustainable Develop...
Today it's raining outside, for the first time since I am here in Rio de Janeiro. The heat has broken but the fog remains. Helicopters are circling above us at the UN Conference on Sustainable Develop...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:01 AM on 07/03/2012
Perhaps, and let us hope it is, this is game over for unhinged hysterical neurotic highly-strung eco-doomsters who seem to think that screeching their fears from the rooftops is enough for them to be taken seriously. Such people are a sick joke. We need to marginalise them to where they belong - sandwich boardwalkers on obscure high streets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisac3333
Farm Lady
09:28 PM on 06/24/2012
0 population growth! The only answer. Right now, countries are waging wars to eradicate other humans, creating more waste lands, dead lands, destruction. Haiti is a place where 0 population growth would have done some good and saved Haiti. Now Haiti is a sand spit covered with humans crawling like insects with no fresh water sources, plastic human fecal matter littering and lining the entire Island and all the waters for miles around. No human has the right to destroy this planet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisac3333
Farm Lady
09:23 PM on 06/24/2012
Dire poverty is already here. No one ever SPEAKS what the REAL problem is. OVER POPULATION. Leaders of all sorts go into poverty stricken countries and carry with the either religion or greed. The only thing this planet needs is for those who are young,strong, intelligent and care enough about this planet to get those rose colored glasses off, put their heads together to discover some easily spreadable HUMAN STERILITY gas to spray over all the countries, especially in the most populated and desperate regions. Our World Leaders are only interested in greed and in producing more greed.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
07:51 PM on 06/24/2012
What does poverty eradication mean? Are indigenous people poor? Why does so much depend on what rich countries can pay to poor ones? Why not challenge rich countries and NGOs to lay off people's land? Maybe they wouldn't, but they couldn't use the excuse of being fleeced. To what extent has there been a comprehensive overview of major environmental systems like oceans, rivers, forests, soils, etc.? Assuming that most of the planet is covered by plans, why aren't these plans examined for consistency, interdependence and sustainability? The plans exist already. Why not spend energy on seeing if they can be streamlined and brought into sync with sustainable living? In short, why is here such a lack of systems thinking around such conferences?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
07:36 PM on 06/24/2012
Rio was never about the environment, it was a scare campaign to stampede the populations into accepting global taxation by a singular global government.

The Rio planning was done in the offices of The Rockefeller and The Rothschild Syndicate.

Rockefeller's principal agent and point man was Maurice Strong who ran the first Rio conference, after which he went to the UN to write up the Administration framework for global governance.

It was Rockefeller Commission that planned The World Trade Center.

Let's use those towers to illustrate the transition from The CARBON ECONOMY to the emergence of The HYDROGEN ECONOMY (no disrespect to those who lost their lives).

The new Tower: http://bit.ly/LrYOPN , will be powered 12 PureCell Model400 fuel cells, which have a generating capacity of 4.8 MW which will also generate the hot water needs of the building.

Releasing The Hydrogen Economy will restore the environment and enable the populations to extricate themselves from being controlled by The Corporate State which derived its power from The Carbon Economy.
01:56 AM on 06/24/2012
Man made climate change is hogwash, we have had periods of time when we have had a tropical climate followed by periods when we have been a mile deep in ice, all without a car, power station or areoplane ever existing on the planet, climate changes, nothing to do with humans, its happened before and it will happen again and there is nothing we can do about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Milks
Ecologist
06:43 AM on 06/24/2012
Bull. Yes, climate changes. But there's nothing in past episodes of climate change that say that this episode must be natural. In fact, the current episode is the exact opposite of what we'd expect. If it were natural, we'd be cooling, as both the Milankovitch cycle and solar output are in cooling phases. So what's overriding both the Milankovitch cycle and solar output? Satellite measurements directly show that it's the increase in CO2 (e.g. Harries et al. 2001). And isotope analysis directly shows that the increase in CO2 is due to burning fossil fuels (Ghosh and Brand 2003). In short, the current episode has everything to do with humans–and nothing to do with natural forces.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
10:10 PM on 06/22/2012
A better headline would be, 'Game Over For The AGW Scam?'
photo
BluePhantom2
The Blacksmith & the Artist reflected in their art
10:55 PM on 06/22/2012
You beat me to it! Thanks Stan!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
12:04 AM on 06/23/2012
It's a hoot how little coverage the scam now gets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
12:02 AM on 06/23/2012
It's just not GW. Many scientists are far more concerned about land-use changes or the death to Earth's natural and wild ecosystems that supply mankind with not only his natural resources, but ecosystems', alone, generate all of the reasons mankind is alive with his only "life-supporting services". This is when the sustainability discussion factors in. How much of the natural and wild surface of the Earth can mankind devour without losing his oxygen, fresh water, food and life?

What is missing from the debates is Zero Population Growth. The more and more of our species, the only specie dumb enough to kill his only home, his nest, the less and less of a life giving world. The more the individual knows about the ecology of our Earth, the more he recognizes what constitutes a living Earth versus a dead planet. Man's unnatural changes to the Earth are all dead planet.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
09:31 PM on 06/22/2012
In all the thousands of columns written demanding we adopt the Kyoto treaty, why is there not one explanation of HOW it would actually reduce CO2 emissions?