It has recently been reported that over 52,000 people across the UK have been denied NHS treatment for painful medical conditions such as varicose veins.
In healthcare, as in many areas of life, we are often told by 'the powers that be' that the best way forward is to mask over the visible cracks rather than to tackle the root of the problem head on, which is what I fear has happened in this instance.
Recently both private medical companies and NHS GP's have been denying patients immediate treatment for varicose veins and are instead insisting on a six-month trial of surgical support stockings to see if that improves their condition.
Unfortunately there is a public perception of varicose veins which labels them as purely cosmetic and relatively unimportant, rather than a serious health issue which requires due care and attention. So I have to say, I am not surprised that few people have sufficient knowledge of the condition to challenge a medical professional/insurer's advice to trial support stockings, rather than immediately seek a more effective form of treatment.
Over the last decade, our understanding of varicose veins has increased dramatically. The medical world is growing to understand that whilst varicose veins might be the visible lumpy veins bulging through the skin of the legs on standing, it's the underlying cause, the failure of the valves to pump the blood back to the heart during movement and stop the blood falling the wrong way down the veins with gravity during rest, that is the real root of the problem. It turns out that varicose veins are not the problem and rarely cause any harm at all - it is the underlying valve failure that causes medical difficulties.
The visible varicose veins are actually the good guys, protecting the leg from damage from the hidden varicose veins (venous reflux), and so treatment of these without treatment of the underlying problem would actually make the condition worse. The visible veins are an outward sign that the internal valves are failing and that the body has taken action to avoid damage. Those with "hidden varicose veins" are already getting that damage and see no outward signs until they start to experience aching, swelling, itching or visible skin changes starting around the ankle.
Treatment of all varicose veins depends upon identifying which valves have stopped working using a specialist ultrasound test called duplex ultrasound. Once identified, the underlying cause can be corrected using one of several cutting edge techniques - which so far have been proven to have excellent results in terms of both further deterioration and reversal of the damage caused. However, despite these strong results we are still seeing a worrying trend for private medical companies to refuse their patients claims for treatment unless they have previously trialled the seemingly useless support stockings for at least 6 months.
I find this very surprising considering that the application of pressure to the skin of the leg by support stockings has absolutely no effect in correcting the underlying problem of valve failure in the veins of the legs. This support can help reduce swelling or inflammation whilst the stockings are being worn, but as soon as they are removed the damage continues. I think it is also important to highlight that no research has been done to prove that medical support stockings in any way reverse or improve the underlying cause of varicose veins.
As the NHS and private medical insurance companies are always looking for "evidence-based medicine" it does confuse me as to why the same healthcare bodies are now recommending a treatment that has no research to back it up.
So, why are the private medical insurance companies and NHS recommending support stockings for varicose veins?
Well, to me the answer is rather obviously money! With somewhere in the region of 35-40% of the population suffering from venous conditions, those who hold the purse strings need to reduce the number of people having surgery to cure their problem due to the high costs of the treatment.
Personally, I think that insisting on six month trials of stockings is a very sneaky tactic. Within six months many will decide to fund themselves, move away (perhaps to another insurance provider) or may even die from something else. Not only does the six month trial reduce the number of patients that will eventually need to be funded for surgery, it also helps immediate cash flow by delaying any payment claim by six months. Yes this might be a good 'sticking plaster' for funders looking to save money, but for patients; it could ultimately come at a great price.
Also on HuffPost:
Hospitals are full of medical and nursing staff to are verbally and physically abused by the people they are treating, but return for work each day.
Though this is a painful and distressing topic, there are hundreds of other such ailments and treatments competing for limited resources.
I just think a fairer distribution of NHS resources for people who have either contributed or are at least first generation British Nationals, would ease the burden significantly.
I was talking to a man who told me his wife and all the people innhis Nigerian village seek to come to Britan to have their babies, for the price of a plane ticket and a stay at a relative in Britain until the birth and not even a thank you to the British Taxpayers.
Wherever else outside Europe a Briton goes,needing emergency medical care, the first question is can you pay or have you got health insurance!
If I fly in from Africa or wherever else in the world , 3 months pregnant I can stay and have the baby here and then fly out again after the birth GRATIS ! Where is the justice in the NHS for us taxpayers?
I forgot, there won't be any district nurses in a few years.
The Chief Executives, who earn enormous salaries, preside over a health care system that hands out free health care to all and sundry. GP's have been advised to treat everyone regardless of status. How anyone expects the Health Service to last another 10 years is beyond me.
one other thing don't have Tattos as in 20 odd years there fad and look real horrible save your money maybe a little Butterfly on your Butt that's enough or in some cases a SNAKE LOL.
Have you tried Zinc supplements? The lack of healing may be dietary. Good luck.
I'm surprised the legal eagles at Huff let this well meaning but potentially dangerous comment through.
Not that is is incorrect, I'm not a medically trained person, but for legal and personal reasons I would bever actually advise anyone on the interner to try anything which might have unforseen consequences, interfere with their own mediacl counsels advice or contradict their medical treatment, without absolute certainty the advice I was giving was correct and could not cause the person harm!
I am fortunate enough to have the means to pay the £1,200 for the procedure in the comfort of a private medical facility nearby, where I will not worry about MRSA or waiting lists.
I am fully aware that there's only so much money available, but I think we can all see there are many holes in the bucket of the NHS which tax-payers money is pouring through. A friend of mine works for the pharmacy department in aforementioned hospital; she said there're massive issues with incorrect claims for cancer drugs to the manufacturers. Thus the NHS gets billed for drugs it hasn't used, or were never delivered. This is just a small example of how our money is wasted.
If these issues could be reduced then people requiring procedures like vein removal would never have to wait or be denied appropriate treatment.