Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mike Hancock

GET UPDATES FROM Mike Hancock
 

Libya Can't Be Run From Benghazi

Posted: 25/08/11 20:51

I woke up yesterday morning to reports of celebrations in the streets of Tripoli as the rebel forces marched through the streets relatively unopposed; but the scenes of jubilation betrayed the very real fact that, as of writing, the Libyan capital is still a warzone, and that Gaddafi loyalists maintain a hidden presence within the city. The future of this country hangs on a knife edge, and it is up to us now, as well as the Libyan people, to help shape the way forward for Libya and encourage it back into the arms of the international community.

What I envisage now for Libya is a process of rebuilding, and unifying the country through national dialogue and with support from the UN. A sense of unity in Libya is now the most crucial step in its struggle against oppression and is urgently required if it is not to regress into a state defined by warring factions and further bloodshed. This would represent a catastrophe for the Libyan people and a disaster for the Governments and policy makers who have thus far fuelled the transformation. The way to achieve this, however, is by allowing the Libyans to rebuild their country in a way which safeguards their own interests, not those of the West. To do this would risk replacing political oppression with corporate oppression, and present yet another opportunity for Western resentment in an area of the world which is already extremely unstable.

This sense of unity can be achieved by making the appropriate preparations for democracy and by building the infrastructure central to its establishment. Essential to the unification of the Libyan people will be both their inclusion in the governance of their own society as well as a comprehensive judicial system which is fair and independent of the Government. Patently, the National Transitional Council will need to relocate to Tripoli, it would be misguided and naive to think that governing a Libya in transition could take place from Benghazi. At the earliest possible opportunity the NTC will need to specify a time frame, preferably around six months, in which elections can be held. It will be critical, during this timeframe, that the NTC are able to show themselves to be effective in Government and not allow the aforementioned disputes between factions to dictate the future of the country.

Unification and stability will not be easy and will require some resources the Libyans do not possess. Any financial resources given to the transitional Government must be carefully targeted to maximise their effect and reduce the risk of corruption during this intermediary phase. It is my hope, however, that the transitional Government, when set up, will be able to free up some of the frozen Libyan assets, which in the UK and USA alone, equate to around $50bn. It is important to recognise that there are still tens of thousands of refugees who have fled Libya into neighbouring Tunisia who need to be re-homed after the devastation of the past six months. It is my belief that to use these frozen assets to support the Libyan people would not just unite the country, but also be symbolic of a new Libya, one in which the people are not ruled by fear or oppression, where individuals can effect change, and where the rule of law is standard.

Another important consideration for Libya is whether to put troops on the ground to ensure a lasting stability. It is of paramount importance that we do not commit UK troops to this peacekeeping effort or we risk being perceived as a state interfering with Libyan internal affairs for our own gain. Our involvement so far has been to try and prevent human rights abuses as far as possible. If ground troops are to enter the country they must have a UN mandate to do so, and, in my opinion, be from a Muslim or North African country. It is also important that the role of NATO comes to an end with the establishment of the new Government who will then be free to determine the next course of action for Libya.

There may be general agreement among MPs about the way forward for Libya, but general agreement is not enough - we need a comprehensive plan to help Libya back to its feet and encourage the kind of institutions we take for granted in our Western democracies. The path ahead for Libya will not be easy, but with the right support from the international community, and particularly the UN, I am confident the blood that has been shed in the past six months will not be in vain.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marchmont
15:56 on 27/08/2011
William Hague was much displeased when Libyan television described London’s protestors as "youthful revolutionaries fighting against Cameron's capitalist brigades". It was, of course, tit for tat but it was also a useful reminder that one person's revolution is someone else's riot or criminal coup and there are many shades of grey in between. It is easy to romanticise revolutions when statues topple, flags burn, rebel martyrs are created and the crowds are euphoric - so long as they are not happening here. The fact is that revolutions are rarely brief or bloodless but are always chaotic, ruthless and deeply unjust affairs involving extreme violence and a vicious settling of scores. They also involve a great deal of the acquisitive opportunism we saw in London as well as the destruction of the homes and livelihoods of ordinary, decent people - just like us.
14:11 on 27/08/2011
Another important consideration for Libya is whether to put troops on the ground to ensure a lasting stability. It is of paramount importance that we do not commit UK troops to this peacekeeping effort or we risk being perceived as a state interfering with Libyan internal affairs for our own gain. Our involvement so far has been to try and prevent human rights abuses as far as possible. If ground troops are to enter the country they must have a UN mandate to do so, and, in my opinion, be from a Muslim or North African country. It is also important that the role of NATO comes to an end with the establishment of the new Government who will then be free to determine the next course of action for Libya.

----------------------------------------------------
As the National Transitional Council has rejected this, why do you even bother to raise it?
jhNY
Mercy.
19:37 on 26/08/2011
So how much money will GB send down to Libya to see that all these goals are realized? And from whom will the nation borrow it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danew13
19:36 on 26/08/2011
It's a nice idea...but sounds like American style nation building which has repeatedly failed. Yes, by all means, establish a western style government and even have the Libyans recognize Israel...But, my guess is after the dust settles, the in fighting will begin and it will take another strongman to unify diverse factions www.hard-truths.blogspot.com
04:21 on 26/08/2011
****we need a comprehensive plan to help Libya back to its feet****

These are the minimum requirements....

1- Once the war is over, they need to establish a full democratic system with equality for ALL under the law. If they create a religious theocracy or tribally divided nation, they stand no chance.

2- Get the oil flowing. That's their biggest source of revenue.

3- If the nation is safe, develop tourism. They are perfectly situated on the South Med. coast.
14:26 on 26/08/2011
Neo-imperialism as it's finest. Hello, we gave up the empire long ago, it's time to get serious about our pledge.

1.) If they want to establish an Islamic theocracy and torture/maim/kill Christians/Jews/whomever else all day long, that's their business, by same token we are not obliged in any way, shape or form to respect Islam's pathetic customs on our soil.

2.) Do not bring your imperialist wars for oil onto my doorstep.

3.) So that old white people can retire somewhere pleasant, I'm told Jaysus died for that. Learn to keep your sorry arses confined to our own sovereign territory.
18:00 on 26/08/2011
***Neo-imperialism as it's finest***

No it isn't. These are recommendations, not commandments.

****1.) If they want to establish an Islamic theocracy and torture/maim/kill Christians/Jews/whomever else all day long, that's their business, by same token we are not obliged in any way, shape or form to respect Islam's pathetic customs on our soil***

So "imperialism" is bad, but blanket judgements about Islam are good? Interesting mindset there.

***2.) Do not bring your imperialist wars for oil onto my doorstep.****

I recommend THEY get their oil flowing. "They" means "the Libyans"

***3.) So that old white people can retire somewhere pleasant, I'm told Jaysus died for that. Learn to keep your sorry arses confined to our own sovereign territory***

Oh racism too. Huh? So, you don't like white people, or Islam.

Who exactly DO you like?