In my recent blog 'Predatory Teenage Girls' I made the bold move of taking some responsibility for my under-age promiscuity. This was widely misunderstood by some readers as a rape apologist rant and endorsement of paedophilia. Nothing could be further from the truth.
My blog was not about the Jimmy Saville train wreck that has deeply affected many innocent lives. The recent rash of arrests connected to the music industry was simply a trigger for a discussion about my own experiences thirty years ago.
I was discussing the grey area of post-pubescent desire - with no talk of paedophilia which is a separate and disturbing issue of which I have no experience. My opinions and ponderings were on the differences in attitude and experience that the decades have brought since the 'swinging sixties' and 'free-loving seventies.' It peered into my old teenage world of sex, drugs and rock and roll of the early 1980s; a time when the word 'paedophile' was almost unheard of (we called them perverts), IDs were rarely checked at bars and music venues. There was less vigilant monitoring of teenage girls and no AIDS.
With all the focus now on that red line of 'age of consent', that small grey area of adolescence is being more militantly protected to the point that many young men, some only teenagers themselves are ending up on 'sex offender' lists for engaging in sexual activity with a girl only a handful of years younger than themselves.
I discussed my seduction of an older musician when I was still 15. I presented backstage at an over-18 club and did a very good job of looking like a more mature young woman. I did not look like a child, I looked like a woman. I am now 46 and see how dangerous my behaviour could have been but I own it and take responsibility for it. I would be devastated if a young girl ever did what I did to one of my sons and then pressed charges. My point is that at 15 a girl can have the mens rea to commit a sexual crime of entrapment. I know this to be true because I am guilty of it and know many others who were indulging in the same risky behaviour back in the rocking eighties.
Sexual intercourse before the age of consent is considered statutory rape. I protest that in the one example I shared, this was not the case. I resent the response from readers who demanded that I label myself a 'victim'. I was not. And by saying so, I do not trivialise other young women's stories of abuse. Some years later I was raped and I have deep empathy with other survivors of such terrible violation.
My blog was not intended to 'condone paedophilia' as one reader suggested. I was disappointed that my discussion of young women and their sometimes wayward and wanton desires was distorted into discussions of the rape of children. The definition of a paedophile is that of a person over the age of 16 who has a primary or exclusive sexual interest in pre-pubescent children (generally younger than 11).
Despite our heightened vigilance over our daughters' sexuality, STDs and teenage pregnancy statistics are soaring. What is needed more than anything else is education; earlier and more rigorous education. As the mother of five children, I am acutely aware of the need to warn young people of the dangers of predatory sexual offenders - both real and virtual. They aren't always dirty old men and more importantly, they aren't always men.
Every sexual encounter on this planet brings a unique set of dynamics and power imbalances that change and slide even between the same two people over time. To promote the idea that a girl is never, ever responsible for an irresponsible sexual act before the age of consent is a militant and dangerous stance to take, particularly when a 15-year-old boy will almost always be held accountable for any of his own misguided sexual behaviour. To suggest that a boy must take responsibility for his dangerous sexual desires but a young girl should always be cast as the 'victim' of sexual activity by an older male, is offensive and completely shackles the feminist sensibility. One young couple are still paying the price 15 years later, despite being married with four children.
With age and hindsight I can see the folly of my ways as a teenage girl but I was not a victim. I was playing with fire. I don't suggest that this is a common experience, but it was mine.
I am not a rape apologist and do not condone child sexual abuse.
The complex issues of consent and power imbalances must be discussed at great length with young people. The biology of sex and the pharmacology of contraception are only the tip of the iceberg. Sex while drunk or high. Age imbalance. Emotional coercion as well as physical. Regrets and recriminations. Rough sex. The unrealistic expectations of a porn-laden culture. False rape claims. We can't shy away from any issues. We need to provide our boys and our girls with maps to navigate the world of sex.
If we encourage sex education but refuse to look at all sides of the issue, then we are not being responsible.
Follow Nikki McWatters on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@nikkimcwatters
BBC - Health: Sexual health and your teen
Sex is not just for grown-ups | Education | The Observer
What teens really think about sex | UK news | The Observer
Alcohol and teenage sexual activity (ChildLine Casenotes) - nspcc
No sex please, we're your parents. Would you let your teen have sex ...
Not exactly Enid Blyton! The teenage erotic novels that are flying off the ...
The rise of 'steamies': British publishers get wise to American craze for teen ...
Let's talk about sex: Celebrating 50 years of sexual liberation
I'd hoped by this age I would be no longer interested but the feelings don't wain. The major driving force in our lives, we could really do with a second chance of being teenagers!!
The fact that you don't feel the victim doesn't mean that a law hasn't been broken and a crime committed. The law states that lawful responsibility is not required under the age of consent and any sexual act is therefore unconsented. Everyone should know the age of consent. What could be plainer than that for any adult?
Also we need to consider if the law treats sexes equally - how many 19 year girls are convicted for having sex with 15 year old boys? If the numbers are widely variant surely we had better be asking why because anyone assuming that it does not happen is a blindfolded fool.
It's interesting to note that the age of consent in Spain is 13, most other european countries are 14 or 15. But I ascribe this to a somewhat attenutated sexual maturity in the UK. Our self-denial in the the UK has also won us the european record for underage pregnancies. On 8 Feb 2010 the Mail reported 63,487 under-15 pregnancies since 2002.
Not good. But while we're in self-denial and keep thumping law books we're not solving what appears to be a problem.
The point I'm making is the law is clear, as it needs to be, not "grey" and it's no defence to say the child didn't feel a victim or for the perpetrator to use a "grey area" as a loophole for their illicit preferences. The law is set to protect the minor. Adults are mostly deemed responsible and should know the law of consent perfectly well; they don't need excuses and a free pardon, they need to find another consenting adult to play with.
I'm not aware the age of consent is set differently for sexes. It is still an offence for a woman to have sex with a minor. There certainly have been cases I've read about.
At the moment the law will state that a 15 year is not able to make the decision to have sexual intercourse but is able to make the decision whether or not to abort if that intercourse results in conception. If we think a 15 can make decisions on major surgery why do we think they cannot make them on sex?
when we're 14/15 we all think we look older than we are, as far as I am concerned I don't care how much coke someone has taken if there is any doubt they need to get a grip on themselves and get some scruples
I am a woman and mother and I have seen young women dressed, made up, and acting in ways that are quite simply terrifying because I know their real age - and I can clearly see what someone who does not know their real age will imagine their age to be.
Of course with adults in their 30s or 40s ultra caution and checking is reasonable to expect but when you have a man of 19 or 20 with a girl he thinks is only a year or 2 y
And finally, your points are well taken. Young women (and young men) often believe that they know exactly what they're doing and walk in with eyes wide open (sometimes while deceiving their partners about their age). Much like yourself I had an opportunity at 16 to hang out with some world famous men whom I idolized. I turned it down- but it was HARD. I knew enough to know that I wasn't necessarily going to be able to control the situation. The magic words, "I'm 16" were all it took.
The only point I'd disagree with you on is your statement that teen pregnancy and STDs are rising. I'm not sure about the UK, but in the US the rate of both are the lowest they've been since records have been kept.
A good start would be to acknowledge that sex blossoms forth in people at puberty. Could be as early as 9, or as late as 15. It can't be reversed. Strange urges stir in our bodies, male and female alike. To then manage this increasingly simmering sexuality (as you put it and it seems a good term for it) is how to suppress these urges or enforce abstinence until such times as society consents that sex can occur. How you do that without drugs or religion, I don't know. How do you do it without invoking the forbidden fruit effect?
I number among friends a guy whose parents were so oppressive about any sexual act, thought and word that he had a nervous breakdown at the age of about 14, convinced that a wet dream was a visit by some she-devil to consign his soul to hell. It took him years to develop anythink like a healthy attitude towards sex. I very much doubt he is/was alone. I'm sincerely glad I had a more permissive upbringing!
I am the mother of 4 boys and I have tried and do try to give them as much information as I can about both the reality of dealing with physical drives and the way the law sees things they consider harmless (sexting for instance) or have not even thought about. However at the end of the day I live in fear of one of them being declared a monster for something that would see them declared a victim if they were the opposite sex.
it's REALLY REALLY weird how people just seem to lose the ability to read when it touches on certain subjects....
That about sums up the relative sophistication of the societies involved....
To many American, commonly known facts _do_ amount to prejudice....prejudice against denial, fundamentalism and ignorance.
from my experience it's true, so if you have experience to put forward I suggest you do it
You are absolutely right... on all counts!
As hard as that is to do practically, when teenage girls are invovled, it's important to look at both parties and at the big picture. Girls develop early and if they want to, they can practise the art of seduction at a very early age. This doesn't excuse any wrongdoing on the man's part... it just needs to be taken into account.
When the case of the school girl and her teacher who went to France was all over the media, all I could think was, "I could've done that". A relationship with an older man, running off when about to get caught... that's absolutely the sort of thing I (stupidly) would have done in my teenage years if I had found myself in similar circumstances. The fact that HE did it, the fact the HE didn't know any better, of course that's what needs to be look at... but calling him a predator? No. And calling it rape? It wasn't!
Thank You, Nikki, for blogging so honestly...
when I was growing up (if you didnt realise I'm male from my picture) it wasn't unusual to hear things that girls had done with other boys and some of them were out of control but others did. I guess it's a case of whether your sex drive controls you or the other way around.
if you control your sex drive, perhaps it's not a bad thing, I mean, you have to learn, just like I had to, so it's probably normal that you do that, but if your sex drive goes out of your control, then thats obviously a problem because in that level of maturity, it's easy to make a serious mistake and end up paying the rest of your life for it.
I personally don't think it's paedophilia to engage with girls sexually when you are in the same age group, that to me sounds alien.....it's like a 15 female and 16 year old male, it sounds just like normal life to me....I wouldnt stray too far in terms of years before it could be entering that "danger zone" but to be honest, young people DO stupid things, it's how humans learn things, making mistakes...
I can just hear the angry keyboards clattering their responses right now....