Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Philip Larkin

GET UPDATES FROM Philip Larkin
 

Shelving Old Plays

Posted: 12/11/11 00:00 GMT

Seeing as this is my inaugural post, I reckon I should address something important: No, I'm not THAT Philip Larkin; they fuck you up, your Mum and Dad (mine certainly did by "accidentally" giving me this name.) I am not a poet - well, not beyond winning poetry competitions at school. I write theatre, television and film. If you're looking for the dead poet laureate, I'm sorry to disappoint you. You're free to leave, if you wish; but you may enjoy my rants and stories about giddy librarians, amongst the many other things I rant about. So, aye. Hello.

As a writer (NB: not poetry - okay, settled), I find there are a number of things that you should try and avoid as much as possible. One of those is actually referring to yourself as a writer; but I'll go into more detail about that in a later post. What I'm talking about at present is revisiting one's completed works. In the past few months I've found myself looking over old work - work that has been finished and plays that have been written, bound and bloody performed. Let me assure you; these have been a very unproductive few months.

What happens (to me, anyway) is that I dig myself into a trench. I sit down and begin to read over my work at my leisure, but soon I'm obsessed; questioning choices, changing my mind and I am unstoppable. You see, it's very important to learn when the time has come to shelf your work. This doesn't solely apply to writing; it's true of many art forms. Returning to a finished product only entices me to go back on what I've written, whether good or bad. For some stupid reason, I end up battling it out with my younger, spottier past self (and I tend to win, unfortunately).

Around two years ago, I met a radio producer who was interested in adapting an old play of mine to suit a radio production for BBC Scotland. I'd already pitched it to him and all he needed was a copy of the script to start moving forward. As of yet, I still haven't forwarded the script. For this, I'm an idiot (apologies Mr David Neville).

The script in question was a play entitled 'Æ', and was written over five years ago. Every time I look at the damn thing, I start re-writing it. Tending to be very critical of my own work, I can't just read - I have to edit and I end up tweaking almost every element of the play - from the characters to the story itself. I'm a nightmare.

You know what though? I'm making a resolution. I've decided that if I ever pick up an old script, I'm going to read it as an outsider. Yes, that's what I'll do; I'll try and alienate myself from the idea that I ever wrote that piece of utter shite in the first place.

Unless of course, it's good. If it's good, give me the fucking credit.

 

Follow Philip Larkin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/philiplarkin

 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:50 AM on 11/14/2011
Brendan O Carroll the creator of Mrs Brown book play TV shows film, revisited it again and again and thankfully it just got better and better for me and him.There will always be an improvement or change as you change required somewhere even if just to keep it up to date with current prevailing fashions.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Philip Larkin
11:22 AM on 11/14/2011
A very good & solid point. One thing that could be said, is that perhaps Brendan was still working with his material over the years. I find that it's unproductive (for me, at least) to return to a concluded piece of work, as I'll just edit. I don't have much of a problem returning to work that's incomplete; except maybe that it takes a couple of hours to settle back into that frame of mind, depending on how long I've spent away from the script.

And I think you're spot on with keeping things up to date with trends. Although, that's not to say it can't be relevant in alien contexts/eras. My good friend, playwright Ann Marie Di Mambro (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Marie_Di_Mambro) recently had her play 'Brothers of Thunder' staged in Glasgow by the Playwrights Studio Scotland. AM wrote the play back in the early 1980s when the AIDS issue was rife in theatre & the media. Her play wasn't adapted at all for modern times when produced in 2011, and bizarrely - a lot of the themes and issues tackled were still wholly relevant to contemporary society, ie. it didn't read as dated at all.

I suppose it's all subjective, really.
04:55 PM on 11/14/2011
Some completed works that spring to mind Salems Lot originaly a short story Jerusalems Lot,Catch 22 the greatest novel ever written was intended to be a novella.
Closer to home Still Game started life as a stage play.What you have on the shelve is who you are what you will become all the great stuff is a culmination of work good bad mistakes victories ups downs lows highs etc...
02:37 AM on 11/14/2011
You might think about using a middle initial. Or P. X. Larkin (like X. J. Kennedy).
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Philip Larkin
09:53 AM on 11/14/2011
I have considered it, but my agent & colleagues recommended that I didn't. My middle initial is 'J' and I have written under Philip J Larkin before. Is it something you think is necessary, considering Larkin has been dead for 25+ years?