Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Downes

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Downes
 

Will Anyone in Business Mourn the Passing of the GCSE?

Posted: 27/06/2012 00:00

There's been something of an unholy stink since it was leaked to a national newspaper this week that the Education Secretary, Michael Gove, has been planning to ditch GCSEs.

His plan is to scrap them in favour of a system more akin to the former O-level, which in itself is rather ironic given that Mrs T herself did away with the O-level in favour of the GCSE system.

It seems we are going full circle.

And the new system could be up and running as soon as 2015 too, for exams in the core subjects: English, maths and the sciences. So Mr Gove is clearly not messing around and means business here, this is no loosely conceived policy document to show he's been keeping busy.

But despite the ensuing rumpus in some quarters since the news 'leaked', or rather exploded, in to the tabloids, we believe this could be a good thing. We know many businesses have long felt let down by the current GCSE system, which in far too many cases has failed to teach youngsters the most basic of skills in the three 'R's' - that is reading, writing, and arithmetic.

For example, just last year supermarket Morrison's hit the headlines after bosses there were forced to send dozens of young recruits for a new store they were opening back to the classroom. Their new starters demonstrated sub-standard spelling and reading skills, and were lacking even simple arithmetic skills. That's not right.

But while large firms like Morrison's can afford to indulge in such well meaning altruism, the same cannot be said for most small firms, who on the whole, can neither afford the time or the money for such practices.

We also know from our own members experiences that this is not an isolated example, and that school leavers across the country do not always come fully equipped with the basic but necessary skills to perform as a competent employee.

So a new system of examinations concentrating more on the core subjects such as reading and writing and arithmetic sounds like a sensible move on from the much maligned GSCE. Let's be honest, since the mid-90s - barely half a decade after the GCSE's birth - every August come results day we've heard the same story from employers that standards are falling.

But we also hear of new record rates of achievement every year. There are private and grammar schools regularly posting 100% pass rates at grades A and A*, and state schools in the more affluent areas aren't far behind either. These kinds of results are startling for many reasons.

From what little we know about Mr Gove's new scheme, it sounds like the new exam will focus much more on the core subjects and, crucially, fewer peripheral ones. This should mean pupils will leave school with a greater grasp and understanding of the 'three Rs'.

Perhaps the days of Year 11 pupils sitting 13 or 14 exams will be a thing of the past soon enough? Being Jack of all trades but master of none is of little use to either pupil or employer.

Let's be frank, most businesses aren't looking for new starters who have an A* GCSE in 'global citizenship'. They need work ready employees who can write a properly punctuated sentence, free from spelling mistakes, and one who's mentally able to work out a simple maths problem.

However, while we would welcome changes to the GCSE model, the Government must not diminish the importance of vocational courses, which are equally important in the eyes of industry.

At a time when ministers are seeking to rebalance the economy back towards manufacturing it would be madness to simply concentrate more on pure academia as the solution to declining standards in education.

Education is about focusing a person's talents on the areas where they can excel best, so pupils who are gifted with more hands on subjects should be encouraged and nurtured as much as one who is adept at number crunching.

To service British business we need a well rounded workforce with the necessary skills and crafts to help grease the wheels of the economy. Now more than ever with the economic threat from the developing nations we need the best pupils with the best education and the best skills to enter the workplace and hit the ground running.

 
FOLLOW UK STUDENTS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:13 PM on 07/01/2012
Robert Downes article is 100% correct, it hits the nail squarely on the head, and echoes my own experiences as a manager in industry precisely! I would argue the point, that this gradual deterioration has been evident over the past 40 years or so, not just since the 1990s. Examinations in the vast majority of cases have been reduced to yes or no answers to multiple choice questionnaires, which limits the ability to formulate, punctuate and reason an answer!

The employer more often than not, recruit their staff at entry level, choosing to promote from within. Good employers constantly look for aptitude, enthusiasm and ability among its workers and send those people on additional training courses to improve their skill and knowledge base. Some even encourage and pay for their staff to gain additional academic qualifications, and offer promotional opportunities!

It is not for the employer to educate to base level knowledge but the job of our schools!
photo
SecularAdvocate
Media Watcher
06:21 PM on 06/30/2012
Laughable. It won't happen that GCSE's are scrapped, because the Lib dems won't support it.

The whole thing is a political soft-shoe shuffle by Gove to garner support for his leadership ambitions.

No doubt the poisonous little paper-shuffler who penned this garbage would delight in supporting Gove in the idea that the government should be in the game of supplying businesses with docile, obedient workers via the education system. And remember, the bigger the business, the less they've paid their share toward that education system, with their off-shore accounts and their corporate HQ's in Lichtenstein and the Cayman Islands.

As the mighty George Carlin says: "These corporations need people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork but just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly horrible jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, reduced benefits, the end of overtime and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And, now, they're coming for your Social Security. They want your retirement money. They want it back, so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They'll get it. They'll get it all, sooner or later, because they own this place. It's a big club, and you ain't in it. You and I are not in the big club."

http://youtu.be/4jQT7_rVxAE

Teach people how to think, how about that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
03:28 PM on 06/27/2012
How exactly do you choose what subjects are removed? It impossble to decide. You cannot deny people talented in languages or the arts these things, and since when were History RE and Geography not considered important? Should be get rid of wood and food tech? I thought we wanted manual/life skills taught in schools? We wont get rid of PE either, and too few schools teach psychology and sociology forus to think cutting them solves the problem, and if kids want to learn these things why not?
So we are back to square one. How's about we break with tradition and let teachers work this one out and trust their judgement? Maths and English have always been hard to teach and the notion people are getting worse at these skills is laughable. I do believe these subjects arethe most important, but all these gimps moaning that things have become slack are banging on about Shakespeare and literature, not spelling punctuation and Grammar. Nevermindthe fact Shakespeare is about as far away from modern English as French is.
03:54 PM on 07/01/2012
It is not a question of what subjects are removed, more a question of which subjects for the basic core necessary for meet the basic entry requirements for entry into the "world of work" Therefore it follows English language, English literature (be it fiction or non-fiction), basic mathematics, history, geography, basic science (chemistry, physics, botany and geology), an appreciation of religion and the use of computers are the absolute minimum! All pupils should be taught up to 0-level standard. Woodwork, metalwork and domestic science, can be added for the less academic students. Languages, media, humanities can be added for the more academically gifted. Guess what! this takes us back full circle to a streamed system. similar to the one we abandoned roughly 40 years ago.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
05:53 PM on 07/01/2012
It really isn't that easy to decide these things and your views are just one way of looking at it. But that system we left behind 40 years ago was in no way better, in fact some of things that happened back then was shocking. Basically we need to change very little. We just need more time for Maths and English Lang and I think at the same time set up manditory after schools lessons, perhaps shoving drama and PE and art into after school lessons. Schools can provide a plethora of after school activies and make it the rules kid must attend at 2 per week. Im all for copy France and extending the school day as well. Rather than cutting it down which is what most secondary schools have done in the last decade.
photo
unitron
Reverse Chron Order never stays checked
06:41 PM on 06/26/2012
Is the failure to explain what GCSE stands for an example of the shortcomings of the author's education?