Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rupert Wolfe-Murray

GET UPDATES FROM Rupert Wolfe-Murray
 

What's a Legal High?

Posted: 2/04/2012 00:00

If you are not sure what a 'legal high' is just click on this link and see what the Shiva Head Shop in Greenwich has to offer. You can order over the internet - in perfect legality - Snow Blow, Jungle High Energy Pills ("will bring out your wild side"), Party Pills, Happy Caps ("will have you grinning from ear to ear") and Kratom which is a "highly potent stimulant" that they claim is "not for human consumption."

Legal Highs are cocktails of legal chemicals which imitate the effects of illegal narcotics. They are the new generation of party drugs. But they are very different to the illegal substances that everyone has heard of because they are constantly evolving - so they can always stay several steps ahead of the lawmakers.

Legal Highs were in the news last week when the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) banned a drug with the street name of Mexxy (full name: Methoxetamine), a drug with similar properties to Ketamine. The report issued by ACMD states that the drug has been under observation since 2010 but they only banned it for 12 months (while they study it some more). Presumably the ban was rushed through because of the recent deaths of two people in Leicestershire, deaths that were attributed to Mexxy.

The banning of Mexxy is a good example of how the suppliers of legal highs manage to run rings around legislators in Britain and other EU Member states. The suppliers know that governments take years to study the effects of drugs and so they continually change the ingredients. There are hundreds of chemicals that can be used as ingredients and thousands of different combinations.

Another unusual thing about legal highs is that nobody seems to know where they are made. Michael Bird, a documentary filmmaker who has been studying the issue, believes that "disillusioned scientists in UK and Holland make up the recipes, which they pass on to producers in China."

Central Europe is often mentioned as a possible source of Legal Highs and one of the first developments in the sector was in 1974 when Hungarian chemist Kálmán Szendrei discovered the psychedelic properties of the cathiones class of drugs (from the khat plant). Poland is an example of a European country that has cracked down on suppliers of Legal Highs: last year the Polish authorities closed over 1,500 'head' shops that supplied legal highs.

Legal highs are more widespread in central Europe and important lessons can be learned by British authorities. In the UK, legal highs tend to be used by clubbers and people who want to experiment but in Romania, an EU Member State with a population of 20 million, traditional drugs such as heroin are in short supply and hard drug users are starting to use legal highs as a substitute.

Valentin Simionov, of Romania's Harm Reduction Network, told me that "most injecting drug users in Bucharest are now shooting Legal Highs. Detox units and emergency rooms are filled with legal high users. One doctor told me he misses heroin users."

Those working in the drugs-treatment sector say that legal highs are more dangerous than traditional drugs such as heroin because their composition is so unknown, making any kind of substitution treatment very risky. By comparison, the various treatments for heroin addiction are well known.

Pasquale Policastro of the University of Szczecin in Poland summed up the difficulty for governments: "The development of legislation on new drugs requires a remarkable combination of different skills."

Inputs from physicians, pharmacologists, psychologists, pedagogy experts, police and social authorities - not to mention politicians - must be coordinated in order to get a coherent response to legal highs.

 

Follow Rupert Wolfe-Murray on Twitter: www.twitter.com/wolfemurray

If you are not sure what a 'legal high' is just click on this link and see what the Shiva Head Shop in Greenwich has to offer. You can order over the internet - in perfect legality - Snow Blow, Jungle...
If you are not sure what a 'legal high' is just click on this link and see what the Shiva Head Shop in Greenwich has to offer. You can order over the internet - in perfect legality - Snow Blow, Jungle...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:24 AM on 04/13/2012
Please do some thorough research before publishing scare stories such as this one, if a head shops unethical marketing of a leaf well known for helping people as a "legal High" simply to make a quick buck. Please think, should you simply believe them, and then write an article about it?

Kratom has excellent antiviral and antioxidant qualities, it can be used to relieve hay-fever and provide light relief from coughs and colds, it is a mild & useful herb that can also used for mild pain relief and has helped me when suffering with insomnia in the past.

My entire family uses kratom for relief from cold symptoms, it is very safe and used by many members of the senior adult population, including my grandmother who suffers with Arthritis, it helps her by relieving her joint pain and allows her to get out and about a little easier.

Just as valerian, passion flower and ginseng can help people who use herbal remedies, so does Mitragyna Speciosa.

Tea and coffee are psychoactive but they do not get tarred with the same brush as those harsh synthesized chemicals sold for people to 'get high'

Whenever these debates are raised, it is only right that all materials be looked at individually and assessed intelligently to ensure the correct conclusions are drawn and people using mitragyna speciosa (Kratom) legitimately are not alienated because of poor research.
07:15 PM on 04/04/2012
Read about Kratom on this website http://herbalgeneration.com/About_Kratom.html You will see that Kratom is a natural herb with many medicinal properties and it is not taken to get high and there is nothing chemical about it!
09:03 PM on 04/03/2012
I get a laugh when Kratom is mentioned as a Legal High, like Salvia, K2 etc

.It is very high in antioxidents and is more of a health item ie Green Tea.

Someone suggested that it relieves allergies, I tried it and my newly purchased box of Claritin remains unopened - it worked! (this is the peak of our pollen season and a bad one at that)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Rupert Wolfe-Murray
09:29 AM on 04/06/2012
That is really interesting, and Kratom does sound amazing...but the way it's promoted makes it sound like a natural form of LSD
07:28 PM on 04/07/2012
How do you stop this type of marketing? Any Idea's?

Headshops get very little if any repeat Kratom customers. But, when they take it and mark it up 1000+% and put it in the shiny bags alongside the spice, it only takes a couple of suckers a week to make it worthwhile.

This is a BIG concern of the Kratom community -
07:20 PM on 04/07/2012
Yeah, How do you stop the "headshops" from marketing it this way?? Any Idea's?

They get no return customers on their Kratom products,It is WAY overpriced and probably low quality. Shop owners just put it in a flashy bag right beside the spice and see who bites. At 1000% markup, it only takes a couple of suckers a week to make it worthwhile.

This is a BIG concern of the Kratom community......
07:32 PM on 04/02/2012
Legalise what people really want - the traditional drugs such as hashish, ecstasy, LSD etc then it can be policed properly and taxed. Easy really!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:14 PM on 04/03/2012
If drugs are legalised then the NHS should be privatised and we should all pay for our own individual healthcare via insurance. That way non-drug-taking tax payers won't have to pay for drug takers' cognitive/psychological/physiological medical treatment. And then people can decide - do I want to risk any side-effects that I will have to pay for out of my own pocket?
02:27 PM on 04/03/2012
You're already paying for the healthcare of drug users anyway, at least those that do it to the point of self-harm. At least if it is legalised it can then be taxed and as such drug users will be paying towards their future care, much in the same way as it is for smokers i.e. a heavily taxed addiction.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Rupert Wolfe-Murray
09:27 AM on 04/06/2012
But do people really want hashish? If you read the recent article in The Economist about how hashish in UK is now more or less decriminalised it points out that consumption has decreased. Is this because the more exposure people have to it the more aware they are of its risks (such as psychosis not to mention forgetfulness and a loss of motivation).
11:30 AM on 04/06/2012
When you refer to hashish and the article in The Economist is it talking about actual hashish, made from the pollen of marijuana and imported, or cannabis in general include skunk and grown in the uk? My understanding is that the importation of hashish is all but finished but the use of homegrown skunk is on the increase. People have been exposed to say the knowledge of the risks of alcohol for generations (such as various cancers, heart disease and alcohol induced psychoses) yet use hasn't decreased.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:05 PM on 04/02/2012
Good old MDMA is what people really want, these are nothing more than easier to make, cheaper substitutes. Just about anything is sold as ecstacy, but it is very rarely the real thing. All we can do now is hope that all these people making themselves human guinea pigs do not suffer drastic health consequences in the future. MDMA is proven safe whereas very few of the newer Chinese chemicals have been tested for toxicity at all. Are any of the new stimulants or cannabinoids safe? We really don't know, do we? The efforts to ban these new chemicals is based purely on hysteria. And the supposed LSD-like effects being caused by the newer stimulants is a selling point, perpetuated by the media. Some of the newer ones are true hallucinogens, but not the cathinone derivitives which make up the majority of the stimulant highs.
04:58 PM on 04/03/2012
mdma has too much of a crash for it to be of any beneficial use long-term. Everyone who has just been introduced to it will rave about it's positive qualities, but that goes away.
12:36 PM on 04/02/2012
Kratom is NOT a highly potent stimulant and should not be bracketed with so-called 'legal highs'.
01:02 PM on 04/02/2012
MXE is also not a highly potent stimulant. The whole exercise seems to be to group any currently unclassified drugs under the name "so-called legal high", demonise them and then ban the whole lot regardless of how harmful or safe, natural or synthetic, whatever the effects are. All without any meaningful research or justification.

Kratom is a plant. MXE is a synthetic compound. Both were (until recently in the case of MXE) legal. Both get you high. Same goes for alcohol.
11:23 AM on 04/03/2012
To say that kratom gets you high is like saying that a good coffee gets you high. It has an effect, but a relatively mild one. My point is that while there is probably justification for concern about synthetic compounds like MXE, there is very little if no cause for concern about kratom. Much less so than, for example, alcohol or cannabis.

The problem with Mr Wolfe-Murray's article is that it uses the words of a single online supplier to attempt an explanation of what legal highs are. The online supplier has a vested interest in selling products, so how this can be considered objective or balanced is beyond me.

Kratom should not be considered to be similar to the substances of concern described summarily as 'legal highs' by journalists, politicians and the police. It simply is nothing like them.
06:47 PM on 04/03/2012
Kratom does not get you high. It has an effect,yes ,along the lines of a great cup of joe. I think people keep confusing the subtle coffee like uplift with euphoria, in which I have only achieved using drugs. weed and alcohol get me high, kratom makes me feel healthy,as do a plethora of herbs that I utilize ,not only for myself but my whole family too.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Rupert Wolfe-Murray
09:25 AM on 04/06/2012
And perhaps it shouldn't be promoted as a highly potent stimulant
10:08 AM on 04/02/2012
"Inputs from physicians, pharmacologists, psychologists, pedagogy experts, police and social authorities - not to mention politicians - must be coordinated in order to get a coherent response to legal highs."

Input from the customers and vendors ????
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Rupert Wolfe-Murray
09:16 AM on 04/06/2012
Good point
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:13 AM on 04/02/2012
This is why prohibition doesn't work.

If there's a demand, then there'll always be a supply.

OK we've tried prohibition, it has failed, what's next?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Rupert Wolfe-Murray
09:19 AM on 04/06/2012
But prohibition does work! Illegal drugs are used by less than 10% of the population but legal (and worse) drugs like tobacco and alcohol are used by more than 25% of the population,

To all those who advocate full legality I say let's talk about it but I don't think it would be the big panacea you describe. You know the Economist is in favour of full legalisation? Why? Because it makes good business sense. They wouldn't object to "Big Tobaccor" and big business generally taking over the supply and distribution of drugs, and making a killing from it, but would you? I bet you don't like the tactics of Big Alcohol and Big Tobacco
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:19 AM on 04/02/2012
Better question: What is an ILLEGAL high, and why is it classified as such? Why is the government in our brains?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Rupert Wolfe-Murray
09:20 AM on 04/06/2012
If they think it is a risk to public health they will (eventually) ban it. And these drugs are a risk --if taken compulsively or excessively.