Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Simon Bolton

GET UPDATES FROM Simon Bolton
 

Don't Be an Office Martyr - Get Creative!

Posted: 25/06/2012 00:00

6pm. Quitting time. Supposedly. That's what it says in your contract at least. As you walk out, you start seeing the narrowing of eyes from your 'tireless' colleagues. "I've got somewhere to be, meeting a friend for dinner' you stammer, trying to excuse your indiscretion. "Leaving early again", they're all thinking, as they hunker down for a good couple of hours of overtime, ensuring, of course, that this devotion to the cause won't go unnoticed by those with the power.

It's not difficult to see how we've evolved to this working mindset in business: tales of previous generations being put to work since the age of 16, and working 25 hours a day in order to achieve outstanding success. The more hours you work, the more 'above and beyond' you go, the more people that notice that insatiable work ethic and the more likely you'll reap the rewards in the long-term. The result? We compete to be the last one in the office, to send the latest e-mail in the absolute dead of the night - I've even heard anecdotally of one employee claiming he was too busy to go to the toilet.

There have been countless studies, research, news stories to the contrary - long working hours cause cancer, dementia, heart problems, depression - but these are mere sacrifices for a greater goal. Does a boxer worry about the frequent concussions catching up to him when he's 60? Does a dancer worry about the almost inevitable struggles with arthritis to come in later years? If you work hard and make sacrifices now, you'll supposedly set yourself up just fine in the future - the reinforcement is all around us.

However, frequently working long hours has been proven time and time again to be detrimental to productivity. It becomes harder to stay focused and tackle problems. Tasks take longer, so you inevitably end up spending even more time in the office, and the cycle continues. Meanwhile, the newer generations, who prefer flexible hours, bring fresh new approaches and streak ahead, unfettered by anachronistic processes. Just because a process is 'the way you've always done things', doesn't make it untouchable. Nor does experience always trump youthful impudence.

I can't deny working hard is a desirable trait in an employee, but this isn't synonymous with working long hours. Today's whippersnapper generation, 'the Millennials' as MTV calls them, are learning more efficient methods to work and place emphasis on keeping a stricter work/life balance. In this vein, research from Harvard Medical School has recently highlighted the importance of creativity for workers, pointing out that hobbies and time away from the office can not only give you confidence, but give you the positivity to help overcome tricky confrontations and situations.

Creativity's an appropriate theme too this week, in the light of the annual Cannes International Festival of Creativity, which is currently drawing to a close. Alongside branding agency Lambie-Nairn, we've been getting creative ourselves with our Cannes Also initiative - being taught a few tricks by Wallace & Gromit creators Aaardman, balloon artists Airigami and Lego pros Bright Bricks. You'd be surprised how many grown adults like a bit of clay and Lego!

It's simply not enough to zone out in front of the TV for a couple of hours - that's only delaying thinking about work again. By stimulating your mind in some way by tackling some different form of challenge, you're putting your brain to task in a completely different way. It may not seem that rock-climbing (advised by TFL last week as a way of occupying yourself during Olympics rush hour) will directly help you deal with a client shouting down the phone at you, but it actually could!

Creativity is not something we should just be encouraging in schools, and leaving behind us once we finish education. From five to 55, and beyond, set aside some time each week, each month to do something stimulating. Make some pottery, learn how to juggle, act like you're 12 again and buy some Lego. Tackle a problem that has no ramifications, stress or timeframe - and simply have some fun. Even the pub plays its part - it's been proven that we are actually much better at solving other people's problems, than those which concern ourselves.

Employers now too are making efforts to encourage employees to make the most of their time away from their desks, implementing schemes and activities to broaden some horizons. From lunch-time yoga sessions, to setting aside a day each quarter for an away day, there's few large businesses left that aren't endeavouring to provide stimulation that isn't desk-based.

So what is left other than a fear of change? All work-no play doesn't just make Jack a dull boy, it could well make him an unemployable one too.

 

Follow Simon Bolton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/thebrandunion

FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE
6pm. Quitting time. Supposedly. That's what it says in your contract at least. As you walk out, you start seeing the narrowing of eyes from your 'tireless' colleagues. "I've got somewhere to be, meeti...
6pm. Quitting time. Supposedly. That's what it says in your contract at least. As you walk out, you start seeing the narrowing of eyes from your 'tireless' colleagues. "I've got somewhere to be, meeti...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
18:56 on 25/06/2012
I do not have to commute to my place of work, but I have heard many stories of those that do, working on their laptops/blackberrys/etc on the train. With the introduction of WiFi on some trains you end up with a lot of people working unpaid. This could increase work hours by anything up 10-15hrs/p/w, all unpaid.

This has to increase the workers stress levels at a time when they should be relaxing, especially if on the way home to family and loved ones.

I'm lucky, I can't do my work outside of the office and therefore cannot take my work home.

I must say though, I don't envy those who do.
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Leary
So long and thanks for all the fish.
10:05 on 25/06/2012
As a writer in the corporate communicationss world I've worked from home since 1991, with all the benefits - and drawbacks - entailed. Only once, with multiple responsibilities on a lengthy project, did I accept the offer of a desk at a client's office in order to be "more efficient and available". I was neither of course...

Instead I found myself stressed by the process of getting myself into central London instead of starting the day - agreeably - by seeing my kids off to school. Once there I would be distracted by office chatter, lose time by being dragged into unnecessary meetings and - worst of all - I began clock-watching. Even with all my work for the day completed and free to leave as and when, I started to look around at the full-time staff and feel guilt (and their resentment) when I got up to leave. It lasted two weeks before I gave up and hastened back to my more familiar - and productive - environment.

Working long hours is fine by me - as a freelancer I charge a relatively hefty daily rate and I'll give my clients a lot in return. But productivity isn't about routine. I tend to work in 2-3 hour bursts, separated by mundane stuff that allows me to power down the analytical thinking and boost creativity. And my most productive time of day still seems to be around 10pm to 2am... I'd like to see the clock watchers compete with me
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coffeemadman
11:28 on 25/06/2012
That sounds wonderful!

Unfortunately for many (including me), working from home is not an option - I support academic staff at a university and need to be there physically to do so!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
12:45 on 25/06/2012
I'm in a similar position Peter - freelance writer for consumer magazines. I also find I work best in 2-3 hour bursts, although early morning is my favourite time to do so. I garden in between, or walk the dog. Vaguely physical, and conducive to letting my mind wander.

I completely agree with your comments about being called in to work in a client's office - what a waste of time. Quite apart from the distractions of an unfamiliar environment, they hardly ever have a computer set up properly when I get there.
07:14 on 25/06/2012
there are reasons to work over the main one is being paid to do so, those who work over without pay are doing so because they are not actually capable in the job or there is a manager who is not capable forcing them through fear of losing their job. I agree with ELI that there is too much focus on a degree and not enough on actual experience and knowledge. the young have a care free attitude because they have learnt to have little loyalty in work they have seen rewards for those who fail so consider that going in to work do it your way if it works fine if it doesnt take a pay off and move to the next employer. I have seen people with degrees take roles and totally mess everything up make the workforce suffer then leave with a pay off, all because they were employed by another person with a degree and no real experience. that is the current cycle of work that I have witnessed, it is a bad employer that watches his workers stay through all night.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
12:51 on 25/06/2012
Quote: "There are reasons to work over the main one is being paid to do so, those who work over without pay are doing so because they are not actually capable in the job."

I disagree. There are many, many people forced to do more work than is fair just so their employers can cut staff costs. I have worked at companies where entire departments are laid off and their workload pasted on top of other people's responsibilities. I once went from being a junior journalist, to effectively sub-editor within three months of starting a job. No pay rise of course. I was also the only IT-competent person in an office of 30, and the only person who could fix the ropey boiler and close-to-deadly fusebox. I asked for a rise and was told I could carry on or quit.
17:07 on 25/06/2012
I did highlight poor management after the first comment about capability and the fact that many fear losing their jobs. if everyone in your office actually stood together and walked out what would this manager have done? I suspect he would have been the one leaving this is where a union can be of some use although unions are very poor at defending an individual. too many allow poor managers to bully them and do nothing i have a situation where birmingham city council dept endangered the lives of children and defrauded the tax payer of millions many know but only I stood against it unfortunately being one makes it difficult to win but i still fight for what is right.
22:56 on 24/06/2012
Now, this is just my perspective, but the most demoralizing thing I have witnessed in a work place is when most workers (or at least a sizable amount) work smarter, better, and faster than the boss - and the boss comes from a background of obvious economic privilege. Requiring a college degree is a great example of something that frequently produces this situation.

I think this is great advice, for how burnt out workers can cope, but it has to be complemented with a healthy company environment, which includes knocking CEOs and managers down a peg or twenty four. Why? Because humans are humans, and being looked down on day after day causes harm. Happy people create. Creating can boost happiness, absolutely - but soul crushing entitlement can kill that creative instinct just as much.

Of course, I take this too personally. But hey, again, humans are humans, and so am I.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coffeemadman
10:28 on 25/06/2012
Very much agree with you.

Although I have a degree, and my job required a degree to apply (though it certainly doesn't require a degree to DO) and I do get a little disheartened with this fashionable dig at anyone with a degree and a job. I got my job because I was a good candidate and I am in my job because I am good at it (passing probation etc), I wasn't simply handed the job because I have a degree.

But otherwise, I agree. Too many managers feel they have the power and right to demoralise their staff, especially prevalent in the most irritating of people - those who try to micro-manage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Platt
16:23 on 25/06/2012
Agree re: dig at people with degrees. My degree is barely worth the paper it's written on these days, and the job that I'm in now required me to work damn hard (and keep working) in order to get anything close to a job in the field I wanted.
19:02 on 25/06/2012
Sorry if I implied that there's anything wrong with holding both a degree and a job. That's awesome you have one and congrats. My problem isn't with people at all but the policies which require degrees when they shouldn't. They bar people at the very ground floor, who witness firsthand the effects of bad policy / bad management, from competing into a position where they can make it better. Degree requirements are a hard line that not everybody has equal access to - especially people at the very ground floor, least likely to hold a degree.

I think it's awesome that people graduate. I wish more people did, absolutely. I think it gives a better shot at pursuing happiness and all that, and that's only good. I've spent much of my life being talked down to by folk who think that a degree and being well-read, etc. are the ultimate judgment of character (you're either a graduate or you're lazy, black and white) - so I'll admit that I come with bias. But, I'm pretty well aware that it's a minority of people with that level of judgment, and sorry if I did not convey that well.