It's happening all around the world. An increasingly politicised Catholic Church is manufacturing confrontations with governments in an effort to increase its influence and revitalise its dwindling flocks.
It is clear from what the Pope has been saying over the past five years that he intends to return Catholicism to what he sees as its rightful place in the heart of Government.
In America, a confrontation with the Obama administration over contraception coincided with the Republican presidential candidate race. Two of the presidential candidates are Catholic and they made full use of the opportunity to present the Obama' health insurance policy as "a war on religion". They were playing to the religious right's gallery, making it one hell of a bruising battle.
In Britain, a similar tactic is being played out over gay marriage. The Catholic Church has alighted on this issue as its means of challenging the Government, flexing its muscles and attempting to pressurise a change of direction.
If Mr Cameron yields to this agitation, it will be seen as a demonstration of the Church's power and it will lead to many other regressive demands that politicians will be reluctant to resist. Abortion is the next issue waiting in the wings.
If the prime minister stands firm against this present battering, it is the Church that will be badly damaged.
The Catholic hierarchy has tried this tactic before over gay couples accessing Catholic adoption agencies. When the previous government ruled that equality laws really were equality laws and there was no let-out for the Catholic Church, the clerical hierarchy geared up for a major face off with parliament.
But it was to no avail. Despite an unpleasant, sometimes brutish campaign, it lost that battle. Now it is coming back with a challenge over gay marriage.
The language that is being employed, the angry rhetoric that is flying from cardinal's palaces and archbishops lairs, is overblown, bordering on the hysterical. People - Catholics included - are repelled by the nastiness of it, the unnecessary vehemence that is directed at people who, perhaps, they know and love.
Cardinal O'Brien's stupid comparisons with slavery, his incoherent attempts to suggest that heterosexual marriage will be destroyed if gay people have the same rights, do him no favours. The backlash against his utterances has been immediate and almost unanimous. This kind of bigotry is seen by most people as crude and like something from a different era.
Now we have Archbishop Vincent Nichols issuing a letter to all Catholics, to be read out at Mass this Sunday, that asks them to support the Church in its campaign to thwart the right of gay people to enjoy civil marriage (that's civil marriage, nothing to do with churches).
It is difficult to know how this will be received, but if opinion polls are anything to go by, the average Catholic in the pew does not share the Vatican's antipathy towards rights for gay people. Few of them will want to take active steps to deny their fellow citizens the right that they enjoy (or not, of course, depending on the state of their marriage).
They know that the answer is: If you don't like gay marriage, don't enter into one. Just like they would say: If you don't like strawberry ice cream, choose vanilla.
But the Church has another agenda. It wants its doctrines written into law so that everyone must observe them. The Catholic Church has failed in its attempts to evangelise the nation, so it will try to force it into Catholicism through legislation.
In many ways there is more at stake here than gay marriage. This is the Catholic Church trying to bully its way into political power through lobbying by intimidation and emotional blackmail. It has many allies on the Conservative back benches.
And now we have a rapidly organising religious right emerging in Britain that will be giving all the support it can to overturn the plans for gay marriage, providing another echo of what is happening in the United States.
Religion is trying to be resurgent in this country. We've been able to laugh at it up until now. But the time has come for us to take it seriously and put up a resistance.
If we don't we will all soon feel the impact in our day-to-day lives.
Peter G Tatchell: Catholic Archbishops Have Misled People on Gay Marriage
Gay Marriage & Homosexuality - Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life
Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor, the Archbishop of Westminster until 2009, is one of many Catholics who has furthered the myth that condoms can cause HIV/AIDS, stating that his “diocese is flooded with condoms and there is more AIDS because of them.”
Condoms have been proven to prevent the spread of the disease by up to 98%.
Check out condoms4life.org, it's a Catholic website that is pro condom use.
2 million people are year are dying of AIDs. Hundreds of thousands of innocent children are dying a painful death that could have been prevented if the Catholic church wasn't actively campaigning against condom use.
Fail.
Good thoughts, by the way.
The current debate on gay marriage is manna from heaven for you it seems (excuse the pun), a not-to-be-missed opportunity to prod and poke at Christians beliefs on a delicate and divisive subject.
But beyond the headline cause, what does the National Secular Society possibly have to offer someone struggling with bereavement, illness, depression or even financial hardship?
The church is fulfilling the role of councillor, physician, financial sponsor and more in the lives of people all over this country and in the darkest corners of the world – driven by ordinary men and women who seek to serve something greater than self.
So when you conclude with the doom-laden prophecy, “Religion is trying to be resurgent in this country...If we don't we will all soon feel the impact in our day-to-day lives,” – exactly what kind of society are you trying discourage?
well-said. an excellent point highlighting the positive and salutory role of relgious institutions in the real world.
Personally, as an american barrister working in this area of the law, i see this gay marriage thing as a very profitable opportunity to expand my practice and am put off at people using this as a weapon to attack generally well-meaning people of faith.
Did they ever teach you about the scribes and the pharisees?
...and your point is exactly?
One where the Church hijacks representative government to intrude into the lives of our non-Catholic citizens.
It's about boundaries. Get it?
The Church is free do their charity through their own institutions and any private institutions that are willing to work in cooperation with them.