News Of The World Closing: Paper May Be Free To Destroy Records

News Of The World Closing

First Posted: 08/07/11 00:43 Updated: 06/09/11 11:12

Now that the News of the World is closing, Reuters reports the paper may be able to destroy records relevant to pending litigation against the paper.

British solicitor Mark Stephens is quoted by Reuters as saying all of the news organization's assets could be destroyed by a liquidator, according to British law. He adds it may be "a stroke of genius—perhaps evil genius.”

That's bad news for the celebrities who believe the World hacked into their telephone accounts. It means they might not ever know what the tabloid knew about them, and how they found out.

Deputy Chief Operating Officer James Murdoch announced that the World was closing after 168 years.

The final straw for the paper came after news broke that the paper hacked the phone of an abducted teenage girl and may have tampered the police investigation into her disappearance.

The New Zealand Herald reports on speculation that the closing could be a "management stunt."

Commentators told the paper that the World brand had become untouchable and closing the paper allows the News Corp. owned Sun to move into the Sunday tabloid market.

RELATED:


FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Now that the News of the World is closing, Reuters reports the paper may be able to destroy records relevant to pending litigation against the paper. British solicitor Mark Stephens is ...
Now that the News of the World is closing, Reuters reports the paper may be able to destroy records relevant to pending litigation against the paper. British solicitor Mark Stephens is ...
Filed by Simon McCormack  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Madmac
12:46 on 08/07/2011
America lacks the guts to kick out this clown and his family. The UK government lacking the intestinal fortitude to order him to preserve all records? When do the people finally win? When?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:40 on 08/07/2011
“Abstract concern about the concentration of media power is now fully formed,” he said. “You have a media power that has engaged in alleged bribery and wiretapping. Then the question of Murdoch’s tapping more power with the ascendant media of the day, BSkyB, is no longer abstract.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-07/news-international-to-shut-news-of-the-world.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:29 on 08/07/2011
Nothing new here...Blackmail and corruption
10:13 on 08/07/2011
This was actually my very first thought when it was suddenly announced that they were shutting it down. Murdock was trying to firewall the rest of his "empire" to keep the flames from spreading. This very act alone tells you that what has been revealed in the UK is doubtlessly a systemic practice of the organization, and we all just witnessed a desperate Rupert Murdock gnaw off a limb in an attempt to escape the trap.

But now there's blood in the water, and the blood-trail has lead to the Sun publication. And cutting off that limb will only attract more sharks.

Feel free to hum the Jaws theme music along with the rest of us... And remember, BIG SMILES!
photo
pdxist
Feel free to copy my avatar! (Or ask me how.)
06:50 on 08/07/2011
How weak is the British legal system that they can't issue a simple injunction barring the destruction of records related to a criminal investigation?
06:40 on 08/07/2011
This should lead to a rule that foreign ownership of the media is forbidden in both U.K. and USA. Send Murdoch back to Australia and let him run a kangaroo farm.
12:37 on 08/07/2011
That is actually the law in the US. In 1985, Ronald Reagan's administration handed Rupert Murdoch a US passport, thus freeing him up to buy Fox and build up Fox News.

The UK does not have a citizenship requirement, but you do have to be a "fit and proper person" to own a media company.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robmclaughjr
N.M.E. of G.O.P.
06:11 on 08/07/2011
Here we go, this is where News Corp hides fox "news" connections to this crime. Why should they worry when News Corporation owns the Republican Party of the United States and the majority of the "Supreme Court" of the United States? They will simply direct the "Supreme Court" to rule as they wish and all will be good for Murdoch.
04:32 on 08/07/2011
This could easily be restrained by a court order, even in the UK. If records are destroyed, it is because Murdoch's buddies are allowed to destroy them.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Bluesue
03:57 on 08/07/2011
Murdoch - evil geniua indeed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
structurequity
structurequity not oppression
03:32 on 08/07/2011
Now is the time for the people of England to show there emotion, do it as follows. when the huckster shouts "News Here!" "Walk on by, just walk on by!"
02:48 on 08/07/2011
The News Of The World Ltd is a non-trading company with the trading activity all going through News International Ltd, therefore a liquidation and the hiding/disposal of documents wouldn’t apply as it would affect The Sun, Times & Sunday Times who all trade through the same company. Basically, destroying records is not within UK law.
02:31 on 08/07/2011
The British Government should take control of the paper to preserve records under the criminal statues. They can not yield to Murdock's genius move.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
"Conservative" is not a political party, genius.
02:02 on 08/07/2011
So the real reason News Corpse is shutting down NotW is so they can destroy evidence. How typical of the far right!
photo
1oldhippie
yes, WE can again!
02:01 on 08/07/2011
Can't a court order them saved as evidence?
photo
Gavin Saunders
we only have each other
01:28 on 08/07/2011
So this is an axample of James and Rupert's sincere desire and intention to assist with investigations?

They have not changes one bit since the the first enquiry when Brooks almost gave the game away admitting they pay police and are no different to one of their headlines.

It makes me sick to think decent people hold subscriptions to their rags.