Panel Says Judges Have Been Too Hard On U.K. Christians

Uk Employee Religion

First Posted: 13/07/11 00:30 BST Updated: 11/09/11 11:12 BST

By Al Webb
Religion News Service

LONDON (RNS) A government-funded watchdog panel said British judges have erred in supporting employers who try to fire Christian workers for wearing crosses or refusing to offer sex counseling to gay couples.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said Monday (July 11) that employers should ease up, saying current interpretations of the law are "insufficient to protect freedom of religion or belief."

The commission's ruling came barely a day after the Church of England's General Synod called on the British government to give Christians the legal protection to defend themselves against prosecution for faith-based decisions.

In a string of legal cases in recent years, Christians have faced labor and legal disciplinary action for wearing religious symbols such as crucifixes on the job or refusing services to gay couples because of religious beliefs.

Philip Giddings, chairman of the Church of England's public affairs council, told the Synod that government regulations should "take proper cognizance of the points we are making."

"We are not making this as a unique claim for Anglicans," Giddings said. "It applies to everyone."

Only seven months ago, the human rights commission had backed a gay couple in their suit against a hotel's Christian owners who had refused to allow them to share a single room.

In other recent cases, an airline check-in clerk was denied the right to wear a crucifix on her uniform, and a hospital nurse was barred from a ward for insisting that she he allowed to wear her cross.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

By Al Webb Religion News Service LONDON (RNS) A government-funded watchdog panel said British judges have erred in supporting employers who try to fire Christian workers for wearing crosses or ref...
By Al Webb Religion News Service LONDON (RNS) A government-funded watchdog panel said British judges have erred in supporting employers who try to fire Christian workers for wearing crosses or ref...
Filed by Jahnabi Barooah  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arkymorgan
Nobody knows the trouble I've been...
01:57 AM on 07/13/2011
It's all or nothing, that's the problem. Either everything is okay, in which case hajibs, burqas, mezzuzas, pentagrams and crucifixes are all fine, or none of it is. I know I'd prefer to live in a society where the right to display one's preferences is respected - but I'm an atheist and cannot be offended by the insignia of what amounts to various fairy tales, so perhaps I have no dog in this fight.
12:44 AM on 07/13/2011
It's a stupid ruling and shows that the government is at war with itself. We keep telling Muslims and Hindus that they must respect our secular laws and customs, regardless of what their book of fables have to say about the issue at hand.

At the same time, the The Equality and Human Rights Commission insists that Christians be given leeway to exercise their faith.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out how the ruling will be interpreted by the adherents of minority religions