Dr Maya Cooper Of Nasa Says Astronauts Need Cooking Skills

Mars Astronauts

First Posted: 29/08/11 09:30 Updated: 28/10/11 11:12

PRESS ASSOCIATION -- Astronauts travelling to Mars are likely to be farmers and chefs as well as spacefarers.

Supplying enough food for a round trip to the Red Planet is one of the greatest challenges facing mission planners, experts were told.

One solution under consideration is for astronauts to grow their own food in a hi-tech "kitchen garden". They would also need adequate cheffing skills to provide varied, tasty menus that lift spirits and ward off boredom.

Astronauts going to Mars would be far more food-savvy than their International Space Station colleagues.

Dr Maya Cooper, from the the American space agency Nasa's Space Food Systems Laboratory in Houston, Texas, said a five-year mission to Mars would require almost 7,000lb of food per person.

"That's a clear impediment to a lot of mission scenarios," she told the annual meeting of the American Chemical Society in Denver, Colorado.

"We need new approaches. Right now, we are looking at the possibility of implementing a bioregenerative system that would involve growing crops in space and possibly shipping some bulk commodities to a Mars habitat as well.

"This scenario involves much more food processing and meal preparation than the current food system developed for the space shuttles and the International Space Station."

Bioregenerative systems involve growing "multi-task" plants that not only provide food but also release oxygen for astronauts to breathe, remove the carbon dioxide they exhale, and even purify water.

Nasa expects to launch its first manned mission to Mars in the 2030s.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

PRESS ASSOCIATION -- Astronauts travelling to Mars are likely to be farmers and chefs as well as spacefarers. Supplying enough food for a round trip to the Red Planet is one of the greatest challen...
PRESS ASSOCIATION -- Astronauts travelling to Mars are likely to be farmers and chefs as well as spacefarers. Supplying enough food for a round trip to the Red Planet is one of the greatest challen...
Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
European1919
I am the Pigmâ’¶n
06:15 on 30/08/2011
Wasn't that what Mars Bars were invented for?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gregory57
Micro-bio, was one of my favorite classes.
01:13 on 30/08/2011
They're going to be making their own water out of urine. Can't wait to learn what they will be eating.

Confidential to Mr. Wizard: I don't want to be an astronaut any more!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fonsini
Let there be pie.
21:58 on 29/08/2011
Gordon Ramsay? in a spaceship ??

If it's a one way trip I'm all for it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LiquidPaddy
I'm a plastic paddy and proud of it!
18:05 on 29/08/2011
In 'Sunshine' didn't they all die? Seem to remember it was a dreadful film where I didn't care what happened to the characters!
photo
European1919
I am the Pigmâ’¶n
06:15 on 30/08/2011
Excellent film. And their mission was a completely different one.
14:59 on 29/08/2011
I see the next reality show coming on, Celebrity Mars Chef.
14:33 on 29/08/2011
I'm not at all optimistic about NASA launching a manned-mission to Mars by 2030. There are so many technological challenges to be overcome, so many steps along the way, so much technology that is not even "conceived" of yet, let alone on a drawing board some where. And the costs will be fantastic.

At some point, folks will look at the vast amount of science that can be achieved with unmanned missions, scientific probes and orbiters, for 1/50th the cost of a 5-year manned mission, and that manned mission will not be realized for generations.

I'd welcome NASA suspending all talk of manned missions to Mars until they have come up with propulsion systems for interplanetary crafts that are NOT chemical rockets.

It's past time for NASA to be weaning itself from chemical rockets and developing next generation propulsion systems. Then maybe a mission to Mars wouldn't have to be FIVE YEARS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darrin Bell
"This is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There R rules"
12:29 on 30/08/2011
We're more likely to develop faster propulsion systems if we have people, not robots, stranded on Mars. There's little incentive to do it otherwise.
15:58 on 30/08/2011
No incentive?

The Russians and the European Space Agency have both decided to stop using chemical rockets for propulsion systems. They'll still use rockets to *launch* things into space, rockets are still best at providing the huge amounts of thrust needed to break gravity -- but they're a dismal choice once an object is in space.

Stranding people on Mars doesn't sound like a viable incentive program.

Just being able to get to and from Mars in less than 5 years should be incentive enough.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Harrold
Huzzah!
11:29 on 29/08/2011
Sounds like the Oxygen garden envisaged in the film 'Sunshine' - plants for food and oxygen creation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
Evil requires the sanction of the victim -Ayn Rand
11:26 on 29/08/2011
Karl Pilkington was right.