Banking Reform Commission Calls For Break-Up Of Retail And Casino Divisions

Banking Reform Report

Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 12/09/2011 00:50 Updated: 11/11/2011 10:12

An independent report into banking has recommended some of the most significant changes to the sector in decades.

The final report of Sir John Vickers' Independent Commission on Banking has called for a strict 'ring-fencing' of retail and investment arms within banks.

In theory the changes would would mean the investment arm of a bank could be allowed to fail without the need for the government to step in with taxpayers money.

Retail subsidiaries of banks will be made legally, economically and operationally separate from the rest of the banking groups to which they belonged.

The government is expected to adopt the measures but there is some tension between the Conservative and Liberal Democrats over the timetable for making the changes.

The report argues structural separation would help sustain the UK’s position as a "pre-eminent international financial centre" while making UK banking more resilient.

The commission was set up in 2010 by the government to examine how Britain can avoid another crisis of the kind that led to the taxpayer having to bail out several leading banks, including RBS and Lloyds.

But opponents of the plan have warned it could lead to higher costs for customers and damage the recovery of the economy.

Speaking shortly after the publication of the report, the Chancellor George Osborne said: "The Commission has tackled that big question we face in Britain... how can we be a home to successful banks while at the same time protecting us as taxpayers if they go wrong. This government set up this commission to ask the questions that frankly should have been asked a decade ago.

"John Vickers himself sets out a timetable and I intend to stick to his timetable. There are a lot of changes involved so this will take some time."

George Osborne said legislation would be introduced during the current parliament, due to end by 2015. In its report the ICB said banks should be encouraged to implement reforms as soon as possible, but changes should be completed by the start of 2019.

However the Liberal Democrat business secretary, Vince Cable, has made it clear in recent days he expects the reforms to be introduced much sooner and wants them attached the the Financial Services Bill currently making its way through Parliament.

The ICB said the reorganisation could result in a cost of between £4bn and £7bn for Britain's banks.

But writing in the Mail on Sunday, Cable warned the banks the recession was "not an excuse for postponing banking reform".

Vickers said that his reforms were "fundamental and far reaching" but dismissed fears that the changes would cause banks to flee London to escape the new regulations.

"One of the merits of the ring-fencing idea is by securing UK domestic banking in that way we can have international standards apply to the international operations of the banks," he said on Monday.

The Confederation of British Industry (CB) has warned the government not to press ahead with the proposals too quickly.

"The UK is going it alone on ring-fencing, so the government must rigorously examine how and when to implement these proposals, otherwise it risks damaging businesses and threatening growth," the CBI said.

While the Unite union said the ICB report was a missed opportunity and was nothing more than a "weak gesture".

The union said: "The glaring omissions on workforce engagement and meaningful changes to remuneration systems within banking means that this report is another missed opportunity in preventing a repeat of the financial crisis in the future.

"Simply creating a firewall is, at best, a weak gesture and, at worst, a pointless act which will not in any material way impact the behaviour or culture at the top of the banks where this crisis was born."

And Labour MP John Mann, a member of the Commons Treasury Committee, also attacked Vickers for failing to consider building societies

"Banks are modelled to respond to share holder pressure and this used to be countered by the stable presence of the building societies when they represented more than 30% of the market place," he said.

On Sunday, Labour leader Ed Miliband unveiled a plan to introduce a code of conduct into banking which will allow bankers to be struck off in the same way as doctors.

Miliband also called for greater transparency on pay and bonuses and more competition in the industry to encourage lending to small businesses.

He said that banks and the government needed to learn the right lessons from the financial crisis to ensure it did not happen again.

''We must not send a signal to banks or any other institution that they can go back to business as usual, particularly at a time when the hard-working majority in this country – who were not responsible for creating the crisis – are being asked to pay the bill in terms of Tory VAT rises and cuts in public services," he said.

He said: ''The Vickers commission therefore should be seen as a first stage of reform not an end-point. There will still be an unfinished revolution in this industry even when its recommendations have been implemented."

"The need for a significant mutually owned share of the banking industry is paramount and the Review has missed the point by not addressing this”.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

An independent report into banking has recommended some of the most significant changes to the sector in decades. The final report of Sir John Vickers' Independent Commission on Banking has called ...
An independent report into banking has recommended some of the most significant changes to the sector in decades. The final report of Sir John Vickers' Independent Commission on Banking has called ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
lastpost
see biography
16:07 on 12/09/2011
"What’s your view?"
What’s wrong with having banks that safeguard their customer’s funds and banks that don’t? Then the customer could decide where they put their money. And government could keep the gamblers in the taxation fold, without underwriting their wagers.
12:38 on 12/09/2011
If I understand this article correctly, the report calls for the UK implementing something similar to America's old Glass-Steagall Act.

That act separated investment banking that issues securities from commercial banks which accept deposits. Among other things it also prohibited investment bankers from serving as officers of commercial banks.

The US repealed that Glass-Steagall Act at the end of the Clinton Administration. Not surprising, some (I'd now say many) economists "believe this repeal directly contributed to the severity of the Financial crisis of 2007–2011 by allowing Wall Street investment banking firms to gamble with their depositors' money that was held in commercial banks owned or created by the investment firms."

If that UK report is calling for something like Glass-Steagall, I urge folks in the UK to adopt it HEARTILY.

I'm still hoping that American financial reform will restore Glass-Steagall regulations here. Our recent Dodd-Frank Act is completely inadequate as a reform measure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Haselden
An Enemy of Rupert Murdoch, since 1984.
13:03 on 12/09/2011
What the report calls for is that the big banks, ring fence dufficient assets to cover their depositors. That a bank separates into two arms, the traditional depositor & lender arm & the risky investment arm.
And that these banks hold enough assets/funds to cover their depositors in entirety. So that if the investment arm goes tits up, the depositor side can still function.
This means keeping 2 trillion quid in funds ring fenced and inviolate, which is upsetting the banks. Remember Nick Leeson? Who'd have thought he was the john the baptist of investment bankers?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Haselden
An Enemy of Rupert Murdoch, since 1984.
10:47 on 12/09/2011
Break up & Regulate and be Damned. It's not like this is new. These are the regulations were put in place after the last depression & stock market crash. Haven't we learned anything about "Bubbles", the south sea, the dot.coms, the subprime?
Mind you the subprime prime wasn't a bubble per se, it was a mass market sanctioned fraud. And if the market sanctions fraud like this, shouldn't the market be regulated?
Oh and banksters? Regulation IS a lot better than what the majority of british people would like to happen to you, hanging from lamp posts is a common phrase, I believe.
05:45 on 12/09/2011
Our USA Gov't has just mentioned; what are you as Americans doing for our next Economic DownFall. Well first of all who said that this past down fall has ended. It far from people still being frighten regarding their Social Secuity and SS Disabilty and Veterans Checks. The USA and their people that are under great poverty; and other Countries relying on us to help them with their own poor Economic situtations. I saw on one of the channels this lady that had been with out food for months. When she got to the line, after walking miles to get food and was next to get food she dropped and died on the spot. That I will never forget. I know for a fact the the American Congress will never let on Bank take over all of the bank; because then that would be a big Communistic Move; but I know that 17 banks are being sued for bad Mortgages. Whatever happens to China and the UK banking and economic system will impact the USA tremendously. Just a though from Ramiro Portillo, El Paso, Texas
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
04:01 on 12/09/2011
I didn't know that they were just as stupid as we were. I'm glad to see SOMEONE talking about doing what was done in the wake of the Great Depression: REGULATE THE MONEY CHANGERS.

We are just as stupid as we always have been though. We haven't learned anything.

Same people that destroyed their companies are now in charge of the nations governmental regulatory offices.

We're doomed to continue downward into oligarchy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Haselden
An Enemy of Rupert Murdoch, since 1984.
12:07 on 12/09/2011
Actually Plutocracy.
In fact thanks to some plucky whistleblower at Citibank, thats how the banksters actually refer to the governmental system in the UK,USA & Canada.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Itsbeenalongday
Eliminating poverty is smart business
03:18 on 12/09/2011
Small business guy is called into the bank to look over his loans.
Goes in Monday morning with all his books, the girl behind the counter says" I am sorry Sir, the bank manager died over the weekend."
"Oh"
Tueday he is there again, "I want to see the bank manager"
"I am sorry Sir the Bank Manager died"
Wednesday and Thursday he is back in the bank only to get the same answer.
Friday he arrives with all his books and asks to see the bank manager
The same girl meets him "Look Sir, I have told you every day this week the Bank Manager has died, is there something wrong with you?"
No, nothing wrong at all, I just like hearing you say that."
03:02 on 12/09/2011
More smoke and mirrors...no one in Congress or the White House has any intention of breaking up the banks.
12:40 on 12/09/2011
Are you aware that this article deals EXCLUSIVELY with banking reform in the United Kingdom, and has nothing whatsoever to do with the Congress or the White House?
15:59 on 12/09/2011
When I wrote it, did not realize I was on the UK Huff Post site. However, my comment still stands. The US of A is not interested in any sort of banking reform. Hope the UK is a different story, but doubt it.
photo
BeeJayCeee
I still loathe Thatcher
00:20 on 12/09/2011
Two weasels fighting in a sack.