Free Schools: Stephen Twigg's U-Turn On A U-Turn

Stephen Twigg

Huffington Post UK   Dina Rickman First Posted: 16/10/11 12:57 BST Updated: 16/10/11 13:04 BST

Labour's new shadow education secretary has rolled back from comments he made supporting free schools, saying on Sunday he still had "real concerns" about Michael Gove's flagship policy.

Last week Stephen Twigg told his local newspaper: “On free schools, I am saying that we need to apply a set of tests, that we are not going to take an absolute policy of opposing them.

On Sunday morning, in an attempt to clarify his remarks, said he meant his party would not oppose free schools set up by the government, not that Labour now supported the policy.

“What I said this week is we oppose the policy, we don’t want a free-for-all in British education, but as these schools open, some of them are going to be really good, some of them are going to be run by really good people and we’re not going to put ourselves in a position as a Labour Party of opposing those schools", he told Sky News.

His comments come after an outcry from Labour activists, who questioned if the opposition was now defining its policies through reshuffles.

The shadow education secretary's latest remarks will reassure grassroots Labour party members who do not support Gove's policy. The shadow education secretary also said that free schools were not a continuation of Labour's academies programme.

“We chose to put those schools into the most deprived neighbourhoods, we chose to replace failing schools with those academies – it was much more carefully done."

However he did offer the government some qualified support, adding: “Where I think the Government has a point is that school headteachers often do want more flexibility and I think we’ve got to look at making sure that headteachers get every support so they can make decisions that are best for the pupils in their schools, but not just in free schools – I want that in all schools.”

Twigg was appointed Labour's shadow education secretary earlier this month, taking over from Andy Burnham. The 1997 intake MP re-entered parliament as the member for Liverpool West Derby in 2010, after losing his seat in Enfield in the 2005 general election.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Labour's new shadow education secretary has rolled back from comments he made supporting free schools, saying on Sunday he still had "real concerns" about Michael Gove's flagship policy. Last week ...
Labour's new shadow education secretary has rolled back from comments he made supporting free schools, saying on Sunday he still had "real concerns" about Michael Gove's flagship policy. Last week ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:36 PM on 10/16/2011
BBC news reported in this area only last week that three schools in the North East were to become "free" schools, now call me a cynic if you like but the three schools in this poverty stricken area of the country with less opportunity than anywhere else north of Watford, are, or were, private schools.
No doubt they'll now have to take on board some impoverished pupils, priority to those at the top of the form of course and as such will achieve the governments targets, and the funding which accompanies those targets, meanwhile, State schools, full of "the feral underclass" will fail to meet targets, have poorer teachers or overworked ones, and as a direct consequence, get reduced amounts for the same job. Fair, is not what the system is doing here, Mr Dribbling Gove
photo
AlanDente
Noses: made to hold glasses
08:09 PM on 10/16/2011
The academy programme was created as a way to improve failing schools.

The 'free school' programme is a very obvious ploy by the Tories to avoid any culpability. Unfortunately, whilst is sounds like a good idea to start to let schools govern themselves, what we end up with is a system that is profoundly inequitable, poorly-monitored and lacking in any national cohesion.

For anyone interested, take a look at how free schools will be monitored. Or should I say, how they will be left to their own devices.

The UK is a nation in cultural flux. This is not a bad thing at all. But what we need is an education system that is fair, monitored and allowed some individual freedoms within a larger cohesive structure. We do not need to further divide the population of this country, and further ghettoise failing schools and their communities.