Michael Jackson Trial: Prosecution Case Winds Up After Final Witness Says Self-Dosage 'Extremely Unlikely'

Dr Stephen Shafer

First Posted: 21/10/11 09:11 BST Updated: 20/12/11 10:12 GMT   PA

An expert in the powerful anaesthetic blamed for Michael Jackson's death has told jurors there is no way the pop star could have caused his own death by swallowing the anaesthetic propofol.

Dr Steven Shafer testified on what was expected to be the final day of the prosecution's involuntary manslaughter case against Dr Conrad Murray.

Shafer's testimony is a direct response to a report prepared by defence expert Dr Paul White. White thought that Jackson may have caused his own death by swallowing the anaesthetic.

Shafer said it is impossible for any propofol that is swallowed to enter the bloodstream, where coroner's officials found the drug after Jackson's June 2009 death.

Murray has pleaded not guilty. His lawyers are expected to begin their case on Friday.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK ENTERTAINMENT

An expert in the powerful anaesthetic blamed for Michael Jackson's death has told jurors there is no way the pop star could have caused his own death by swallowing the anaesthetic propofol. Dr Stev...
An expert in the powerful anaesthetic blamed for Michael Jackson's death has told jurors there is no way the pop star could have caused his own death by swallowing the anaesthetic propofol. Dr Stev...
Filed by Caroline Frost  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cherubim
04:51 AM on 10/23/2011
Conrad Murray is a "Corporate Hit Man". AEG had no respect for Michael Jackson.
AEG considered Michael Jackson thier "work slave"
Conrad Murray began practicing his medicine in a way he thought would please his
new employer AEG. He no longer cared about Michael Jackson's health; he treated
Michael Jackson like an inanimate object he needed to maneuver
in order to collect his $150,000 monthly salary.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
11:30 AM on 10/21/2011
After the extensive medical evidence on behalf of the prosecution, I am at a loss to understand why Murphy's lawyers have not advised him to change his plea to guilty.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:57 PM on 10/21/2011
It's going to be really interesting to see what the defense team come up with.

On the face of it, the prosecution case has been pretty damming.

I assume the defense are going to go for:

(a) An attempt to discredit the testimony of the medical witnesses (in terms of sowing doubt in the minds of the jury) -- although as these medical people seem to be world-class in their own specialties, I'm not sure how this will work.

(b) Bring out lots of character witnesses for the good doctor.

Their original attempts to portray MJ as a drug abuser during cross-examination -- and hence using this as an explanation of why he contributed to his own demise -- didn't seem to be getting anywhere.

So. An interesting 2 weeks ahead of us.

Let's hope that Sky News can improve on its coverage of the trial. I'm finding myself having to simultaneously watch an Internet feed for when Sky decides to drop the proceedings for an Ad-break (every few minutes), or simply drops the proceedings altogether, for whatever reason.