Broadmoor Appeal: Psychiatric Patient Albert Haines Loses Battle For Release


First Posted: 26/10/11 13:03 BST Updated: 26/12/11 10:12 GMT   PA

The first psychiatric patient to have an appeal against detention held in public has lost his legal battle to be freed from Broadmoor Hospital.

Albert Haines, 52, made legal history when he successfully argued that his case should be considered at an open hearing.

But a mental health tribunal ruled that the nature or degree of his mental disorder meant he should not be released from the high-security psychiatric institution.

Mr Haines was convicted of two counts of attempted wounding in September 1986 after he armed himself with a machete and a knife and tried to attack a doctor and a nurse at the Maudsley psychiatric hospital in Camberwell, south London.

Since then he has been detained under the Mental Health Act at Broadmoor in Crowthorne, Berkshire, and at Three Bridges medium secure unit in Ealing, west London.

The tribunal heard that he does not think there is anything wrong with him and believes his discharge from Broadmoor is "in the moral public interest". But it also received evidence from Dr Jose Romero-Urcelay, Mr Haines's responsible clinician, who argued that the patient remained a risk to the public and to himself.

The mental health tribunal panel's ruling, the first ever published, criticised Broadmoor for repeatedly moving Mr Haines between wards this year, which it described as destabilising and "extremely unhelpful".

The panel concluded: "Plainly these tribunal proceedings, being greatly extended by the issue of whether the hearing should be in public, have dominated Mr Haines's life in the last two years or so, really to the exclusion of everything else.

"It is in nobody's interest that Mr Haines should have to be detained, whether in high or medium security, for a day longer than absolutely necessary. In our judgment detention does remain necessary, and we conclude by observing that it is likely to remain so unless the treating team are able to find a way of engaging Mr Haines, and that this will require an equal commitment by Mr Haines himself."

An estimated 100,000 mental health tribunals have been held in the past seven years, but out of these there were only 10 applications for the hearing to be held in public. Only one previous application for an open session was granted, and this was later withdrawn.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

The first psychiatric patient to have an appeal against detention held in public has lost his legal battle to be freed from Broadmoor Hospital. Albert Haines, 52, made legal history when he success...
The first psychiatric patient to have an appeal against detention held in public has lost his legal battle to be freed from Broadmoor Hospital. Albert Haines, 52, made legal history when he success...
The first psychiatric patient to have an appeal against detention held in public has lost his legal battle to be freed from Broadmoor Hospital. Albert Haines, 52, made legal history when he success...
The first psychiatric patient to have an appeal against detention held in public has lost his legal battle to be freed from Broadmoor Hospital. Albert Haines, 52, made legal history when he success...
Filed by Olivia Williams  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
European1919
I am the Pigmâ’¶n
06:06 AM on 10/27/2011
It is the obligation of the state to keep the general population safe. Keep the nuts wehre they belong - public hearing or no.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sillyfrog
Pastafarian and UU student
03:18 PM on 10/26/2011
To win an appeal against detention held in public I think is a good thing for people that shouldn't be there. Sounds like he should have lost the appeal.