Greenpeace's Rainbow Warrior III Returns To London

Rainbow Warrior

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 08/11/11 21:36 GMT Updated: 04/01/12 10:54 GMT

Greenpeace's Rainbow Warrior III, one of the world's most famous symbols of environmental activism, arrived in London on Tuesday afternoon after making its maiden voyage to Amsterdam.

It is just over 30 years ago that the first Rainbow Warrior launched from the Thames and went on to define environmental campaigning for a generation.

The original, a converted British fishing trawler, was blown up by French special forces in New Zealand in 1985, in an attempt to stop the Greenpeace campaign against French H-bomb tests in its Pacific colonies.

The second, which was also a refit of an old boat, has now been donated as a hospital ship in Bangladesh.

Sailing up the Thames, the latest ship is a slick operation. At 838 tonnes, with a sail capacity of over 1200 sq metres, it is the first Rainbow Warrior to have been designed and specifically built for the purpose of promoting environmental causes.

The ships are used to raise awareness of the many environmental injustices of the time, from nuclear testing in the Pacific Islands to the dumping of hazardous chemicals at sea and deforestation in the Amazon.

The Rainbow Warrior III is the first to have been built specifically for Greenpeace's environmental campaigns, and is one of the most environmentally friendly boats in the world. It has an energy efficient electric engine, uses heat from the engine for hot water and heating, and has on-board bio waste treatment, so that it is not discharged into the sea.

Talking to The Huffington Post UK from West India dock, where the boat and its crew arrived, John Sauven, Executive Director of Greenpeace, explained that this purpose-built ship is a "big statement of our values and the new technology we will be harnessing to solve environmental issues".

Greenpeace has had to adapt to the new world of environmental activism, over the past 40 years. But many of the issues have remained a constant as they still tackle climate change, deforestation and sustainable fishing.

Sustainable fishing has become a particular area of contention for tactics from different environmental groups.

Whilst newcomers such as the Sea Shepherd now take a more confrontational approach, Greenpeace remains attached to its non-violent action, as Sauven explained.

"We have to say each to their own tactics. We think strategically to fight our battles and we feel that we are winning the battle against whaling by talking to the Japanese themselves.

"Sea Shepherd are confronting Japanese people aggressively and it is exacerbating nationalism, and actually making it more difficult".

Over the next six days the Rainbow Warrior will be moored at West India Dock on the Thames, where it will play host to thousands of Greenpeace supporters, as well as local school children and special guests.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Greenpeace's Rainbow Warrior III, one of the world's most famous symbols of environmental activism, arrived in London on Tuesday afternoon after making its maiden voyage to Amsterdam. It is just o...
Greenpeace's Rainbow Warrior III, one of the world's most famous symbols of environmental activism, arrived in London on Tuesday afternoon after making its maiden voyage to Amsterdam. It is just o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:18 PM on 12/04/2011
John Sauven's criticism of Sea Shepherd is absurd. Paul Watson puts his money where his mouth is, risking his life to save whales, while Sauven give conservation lip service. Sea Shepherd's 2010-2011 campaign in Antarctica speaks volumes to their commitment to saving whales and bankrupting the Japanese whaling fleet. And Greenpeace? They eat whale meat with the Japanese to appease them and refuse to assist Sea Shepherd in Antarctica despite requests therefore.

I'll keep sending my donations to Sea Shepherd until Greenpeace learns to truely be an activist for whales, wildlife and the environment.

Mark Brandes
Denver, Colorado
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Mcilroy
02:20 PM on 11/18/2011
Oh come on folks... there is room for both Greenpeace and Sea Shepherd to co-exist. They perform different roles in the environmental arena and there is a need for both....

So Greenpeace is a little less confrontational than Sea Shepherd - but they can mobilise a large number of supporters to nudge big business to change their ways

Sea Shepherd are more confrontational and may win a lot of skirmishes but they won't win the war - however they will keep the subject in the public's perception
04:58 PM on 11/14/2011
I love the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society!!! This video outlines clearly Paul Watson's reason for being involved in conservation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_gTBDFTXE0
04:48 PM on 11/14/2011
"Sea Shepherd are confronting Japanese people aggressively and it is exacerbating nationalism, and actually making it more difficult". It has become quit clear that the SSCS have done more to incite Japan to continue whaling than to reduce it. Paul Watson, for some reason, cannot figure out that the culture does not want to give in to terror. Ask why they have invested a further 27 million this year? For Paul Watson the southern ocean mean media, money, movies and TV and nothing more!!! There are nations that take more endnagered whale species than Japan, but given that this harvest takes place in international waters Watson and do what he pleases and pretend wh0 he whats to be.
12:31 AM on 11/14/2011
Thank God for the Sea Shepherds who actually go to the Southern Ocean and protect the actual lives on the whales. They get between the whales and those who kill them. How many whales has Green Peace actually saved from slaughter? So enough of your promotional tour, banner hanging, and sending origami whales? I gave up on Greenpeace years ago regarding the environment. This attack piece on the Sea Shepherds should be withdrawn ASAP. Paul Watson, Founder of the Sea Shepherds and Co-Founder of Greenpeace should be applauded for his heroic work on behalf of saving Whales in the Southern Ocean.
12:57 AM on 11/12/2011
Greenpeace and the Rainbow Warrior may have defined activism for a generation but that generation has passed. Gone are the days of direct action and making a real difference. Gone are the days when our planet came first. Now Greenpeace has become a big fat, do nothing, money hungry bureaucracy that is adored by the feel good hippies.

Raising awareness while doing nothing is pointless and self indulgent. Fundraising for the sake of fundraising is futile. Calling down those who take real action is hypocritical.

Spending €33 million on a ship that doubles as a diner and a pleasure craft for tourists is ludicrous! Imagine how far €33 million would go if it had actually been applied to stopping those who bring harm to the planet. Greenpeace has raised $50 million dollars to stop illegal whaling in the southern ocean, nearly double the budget of Japan's whaling fleet this year and the only ones down there stopping them will be Captain Paul Watson and the brave volunteer crews of Sea Shepherd.

Greenpeace has become a joke amongst the conservation movement. The once great champions of the cause sidelined by their corporate day jobs.

Yes there is a place for lobbyists in the fight for the survival of our planet but their is also a vital need for those who are willing to step up and take direct action. It's easy to "talk the talk" but a whole other story to "walk the walk". Shame on you Greenpeace, shame on you!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karen Berish Heilner
03:22 PM on 11/12/2011
Greenpeace does and continues to do plenty for environmentalism across the globe, including direct action. As a close friend of someone who has worked for them and traveled the globe for them for decades, you don't the half of what they do, and it encompasses a great deal more than saving the whales.
02:29 AM on 11/13/2011
Of course Greenpeace does environmentalism, that is a given.

What I am saying is that the Greenpeace that once "defined a generation" no longer exists. In it's place is a corporate media and fundraising machine seems to be perfectly content clapping itself on the back while pushing papers, spinning silly PR campaigns and lobbying governments/companies in the politest way possible.

To my knowledge Greenpeace has not undertaken an actual direct action campaign in at least a decade. For Greenpeace to call down another organization trying to affect a positive change in this world is irresponsible and hypocritical, especially when that organization is doing it successfully and with a fraction of the funds.

Let's hope that what Greenpeace is doing encompasses more than just saving the whales because they sure aren'y doing that!
08:34 AM on 11/17/2011
The Arctic Sunrise is confronting French factory trawlers in the north Atlantic as we speak, and 3 activists almost lost their lives when a RIB overturned. The Esperanza spent the summer in the Arctic confronting deep sea oil drilling, with 17+ crew members getting arrested. Then there was the occupation / shut down of a coal fired power station in South Africa last week - which must be a challenging place to campaign, oh and more.

So if Greenpeace gave up on direct action 10 years ago, perhaps someone should tell them, as my newsfeed seems full of such stories.
03:20 PM on 11/11/2011
Sea Shepherd's are not newcomers. The society has been around since 1977. The President of the society Capt Paul Watson was with GP in the very early days. Since then GP has become a middle of the road, feel good, uneffective, PR machine. As a news service Huffington, you must get your facts right.
01:50 PM on 11/11/2011
If you ask me Greenpeace's biggest project now is just to insure their continued existence. When is the last time they took a risk ? Big, bloated, do-nothing bureaucracy is what I see...sad!!!
07:10 AM on 11/11/2011
It appears that Olivia needed to weigh-in with her own views... triggering Greenpeace to take an unjustified stab as SeaShepherd... working toward similar desired outcomes... yet taking different approaches. I wonder who died and left John Sauven thinking that his ideas about what is required to win this game... are the only ideas in the world. Some people have an ego that gets in the way of the greater purpose. Disappointing. :(
06:47 AM on 11/11/2011
Serving meat aboard your do-nothing ships is neither Green nor Peace. Sea Shepherd do more than you ever have with a tenth of the funds.
06:18 AM on 11/11/2011
Take that ship and DO something with it...
What a total waste, species are on the verge of extinction, and you host tours and dinners...