Libya Operations Cost Britain £212m - Less Than Ministers Predicted

Eurofighter

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 08/12/11 10:45 Updated: 08/12/11 10:47

The cost to the British government of military intervention in Libya is estimated to be £212m, almost a third less than ministers' previous prediction.

Defence Secretary Philip Hammond revealed the figure in a speech on Thursday, and confirmed that the cost would be met from the Treasury reserve, rather than the squeezed MoD budget.

In a speech to the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) in London, Hammond argued that the successful Libya campaign that led to the downfall of Colonel Gaddafi proves the British military can still take on extra commitments despite cuts to its capabilities.

"This year, our armed forces have shown that - even with the enduring campaign in Afghanistan - they have the capability and the capacity to respond when the national interest requires," he said.

However while the £212m bill may be lower than some previous predictions, it is still higher than the government initially expected.

When military action began in March, George Osborne told MPs that the cost would be "in the order of tens of millions of pounds, not hundreds of millions".

In June Danny Alexander, the chief secretary to the Treasury, admitted that the price tag of the campaign would actually run in to the hundreds of millions.

Hammond was appointed defence secretary in October following the resignation of Liam Fox. The former transport secretary was destined to become the chief secretary to the Treasury in a Conservative majority government charged with implementing public spending cuts.

He tried to allay fears that he is only interested in saving money at the MoD by telling RUSI he understood the purpose of the department "isn't simply to balance the books; it exists to defend the country".

"But the situation we face now - after the years of political failure to grip the problem - is that eliminating the black hole in the defence budget is the only way to sustain military capability over the long-term."

The coalition blames Labour for overspending massively, particularly on procurement, while in office.

Hammond also said that the succesful conclusion of current operations in Afghanistan was his "first priority".

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

The cost to the British government of military intervention in Libya is estimated to be £212m, almost a third less than ministers' previous prediction. Defence Secretary Philip Hammond revealed th...
The cost to the British government of military intervention in Libya is estimated to be £212m, almost a third less than ministers' previous prediction. Defence Secretary Philip Hammond revealed th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
14:04 on 10/12/2011
Quote : The first day of Operation Odyssey Dawn had a price tag of well over $100million for the U.S. in missiles alone, according to estimates.


Have to be somewhat sceptical of this estimate.
21:38 on 11/12/2011
The Libyan campaign began by US using 150 Tomohawk cruise missiles to take out Libyian SA-5 long range SAMs, radars and known C&C. After that, pretty much handed it over to Europeans, but France did all cowboy stuff.
22:38 on 09/12/2011
£212million, is that a day???????????
19:56 on 09/12/2011
psssh,dont tell anyone its over 2 billion
19:51 on 09/12/2011
some £230-260-million for the 25 weeks since March 19. The new calculations put the cost of UK operations at well over £600-million, and arguably into the £1.25-billion-plus range. This has to come out of existing MoD reserves
• A fascinating breakdown of the costs of mounting an air operation: £35,000 per Tornado GR4 mission, £45,000 per Typhoon Eurofighter active mission
• Bombs and missiles are more expensive: £183,000 for a Brimstone missile, £50,000 per Paveway guided bomb
• An single extra mission involving cruise missiles cost £11m
• Use of the Italian base at Gioia del Colle has cost the UK at least £10m
• Up until the end of May, Tusa estimated missions had cost around £512m
• Since then, the estimates are of another £377m - taking to it to a max figure of £950m, for air and sea operations alone
same old tories fiddling the figures
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
17:51 on 09/12/2011
I could have got the job done for a fraction of the price.
12:34 on 09/12/2011
August 23rd, 2011

How much does the Libya intervention cost the U.S.?

"Answer: The exact amount the U.S. has spent in Libya to-date has not been released. Yet, according to the Pentagon, the cost through July 31 was $896 million. If costs have been sustained (about $6.6 million a day) then the total now would be $1.05 billion.

Micah Zenko at the Council on Foreign Relations runs the numbers from available data and comes up with $1.1 billion.

To compare, the U.S. was spending $6.2 billion and $3.5 billion each month in Afghanistan and Iraq, respectively, as of the end of April."

http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/08/23/question-how-much-does-the-intervention-in-libya-cost-the-u-s/
11:53 on 09/12/2011
Any chance of the Libyians paying back the £212 million now they have been liberated. Britain needs the cash more than Libya does (they have lots and lots of oil) to help pay OUR debts which is £billions. And now that Cameron has given the finger to Europe and sunk us deeper we will need every Pound, Euro and Dollar we can lay our hands on.

And now that we know the cost (which I find very hard to believe), will the government now tell us how much Iraq and Afganistan have cost the tax payer (to date) along with the number of lives lost of our military forces personel.
11:15 on 09/12/2011
£212 million is cheap for all that OIL!!!

I have now decided that I was wrong to think of David Cameron as 'greasy, ~ he is most definitely OILY. How many oil companies will be be on the board of when he does the decent thing and steps down as PM?
04:07 on 09/12/2011
So we only gave them 47 smart bombs then.
21:57 on 08/12/2011
£212 million for what ? It is not mentioned in the UK media but Libya is now in turmoil with armed gangs fighting each other for control of various areas. There are also reports in the Malta press that Libyan gangs are encouraging illegal immigrants from Somalia, Ethiopia , Nigeria etc to pay for passage to Malta and Southern Italy, and you don't need many guesses to know where they all intend getting to.
18:12 on 08/12/2011
20-30000 men women and children killed in six months by NATO, 80000 killed by lybians on libyans life is cheap.
£30billion in contracts rebuilding command and control targets, and there is the oil, busness is good there must be more Humanitarian Deeds to be done.
Murder the Victims family must all hate ya.
17:35 on 08/12/2011
Yet another HPUK article that sounds like a government press release, heck a government pamphlet.

What you have failed to report is that the cost has come down because they have saved money replacing the munitions used.

We can only hope the new, cheaper munitions work just as well as the previous ones.
17:25 on 08/12/2011
Where do they get these figures from, £212 m, is that above the 'fixed' cost, such as personnel, equipment and facilities, in other words the cost of fuel, weapons expended and replacement parts, wear and tear etc, if so thats a lot of money wasted on such a 'small operation', or is it merely the cost applied taking in account the resources needed if it was hired out on an 'internal market' basis.
14:49 on 08/12/2011
Shame we haven't got a couple more aircraft carriers to sell to pay off the bill. We'll just have to shut down a few hospitals instead
13:56 on 08/12/2011
After wildly underestimating the cost, it was overestimated. Now it's not as bad as we thought. Pure spin.