Ministry Of Defence Wasted £1.1bn On Undelivered Armoured Vehicles

British Troops

Huffington Post UK   Charlie Lindlar First Posted: 09/12/11 08:27 Updated: 09/12/11 10:17

The Ministry of Defence has spent more than £1bn since 1998 on armoured vehicles that have never appeared, a parliamentary committee has found.

The Public Accounts Committee said is "extremely concerned" in a report released on Friday, which found that £1.1bn was spent procuring multi-functional armoured vehicles, which have never surfaced.

Among the chief causes of this vacuum of money were over-specified vehicle requirements, swathing budget cuts and money being wasted on equipment purchased to fill holes left by missing projects.

One key cause, the report said, was the MoD removing a large portion of its budgets for armoured vehicles, a total of £10.8bn until 2021. These cuts have seen the department become increasingly less capable of seeing through commitments, exemplified by the £321m spent on cancelled procurement deals since 1998.

Removing money from the budgets was a method of balancing the department books, but committee chair Margaret Hodge said that the department needed to "stop raiding the armoured vehicles chest every time it needs to make savings."

The MoD have also been given an extra £2.8bn in 'urgent operational requirements' (UORs) in order to obtain equipment to fill the gap left by the non-existent vehicles in those 13 years. The committee report states that: "The Department must avoid introducing UORs to compensate for its own poor programme and financial management," and only use them in genuine cases of emergency.

The committee also blame the MoD's current procurement strategy, with vehicles being ordered that are over-specific and not adaptable enough to be used in various combat scenarios.

Overly-specified vehicles, if not made swiftly and appropriately, become redundant and need to be replaced earlier. Buying vehicles 'off the shelf' is a cheaper and faster way to acquire technology, and the committee encouraged the MoD to do this whenever possible.

In response the report, Peter Luff, Minister for Defence Equipment, Support and Technology, said: “The armoured vehicle programme was left in a mess by the previous government. We are now sorting out their unrealistic and unaffordable plans by balancing the budget, investing real money in equipment and reforming outdated procurement practices."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

The Ministry of Defence has spent more than £1bn since 1998 on armoured vehicles that have never appeared, a parliamentary committee has found. The Public Accounts Committee said is "extremely con...
The Ministry of Defence has spent more than £1bn since 1998 on armoured vehicles that have never appeared, a parliamentary committee has found. The Public Accounts Committee said is "extremely con...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 57
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
16:03 on 10/12/2011
Urgent Operational Requirements come from the frontline and means they are needed urgently, mostly to save lives. Horrible to see some "committee member" in London disapproves.
15:38 on 10/12/2011
what has this goverment been doing the last 18 month ????????? all the do is blame the last one
11:16 on 10/12/2011
first of all get your self put on the board of a consultancy firm ,then get one of your mates who is on the board of a weapons manufacturing business and then phone another one of your mates who in the MOD and you have the start of a multi million pound ripp off your mates will keep things going and when you are back in the house you can keep an eye on the arms commities so you can tell your mates if anything crops up ,who is going to argue with a minister of the state !

you could never get away with it in civy street but then this is not civy street is it !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
22:28 on 09/12/2011
They spent more than that on phantom WMD in Iraq.
18:51 on 09/12/2011
That's peanuts, the American Department of Defense probably wastes that much taxpayer money on catering every year. You got a long way to go guys!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blockem1
When will our politicians start putting policies
18:25 on 09/12/2011
What jerks were responsible for this because if you ask me this is criminal negligence, have they been sacked and for god sake were there no controls put in place, for one billion we could have created a great industry employing many with a product to sell world wide .... lets find out who was paid what because this stinks of corruption , you only do deals like this if someone is being paid off , you not telling me that in the whole of the British army there wasn't one officer that could of told them ... they were useless .. complete bloody idiots
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
18:20 on 09/12/2011
The MoD has not been fit for purpose for many years, it is a total disgrace that our taxes are wasted, whilst our soldiers are dying needlessly
17:21 on 09/12/2011
They should have bought a couple of old skodas, as they are much more reasonably priced and better than nothing which is what they have spent a billion on. Tell you what MOD i'll let you have a couple of dozen Skodas with a couple of extra metal panels welded on the bottom for say about 10 million. Bargain. You can reach me at this address.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
17:11 on 09/12/2011
Someone needs to get a grip on government "white elephants" that never see the light of day. Taxpayer's money is getting poured down the drain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blockem1
When will our politicians start putting policies
18:27 on 09/12/2011
Never mind getting a grip on them they should be thrown out the country !
17:06 on 09/12/2011
surely phantom tanks would be harder for the enemy to detect so sounds good to me as its all about camoflage isnt it!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
17:04 on 09/12/2011
Government departments who control large budgets like the MOD should be prevented from spending anything until accountants have verified it. The MOD recently received £ million bonuses for saving money, this should be investigated.The amount of taxpayer's money wasted by the government must equal the GDP of a small country and this cavalier attitude towards taxpayer's money must be stopped..
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
03:23 on 10/12/2011
No, you couldn't take their secrecy away. That would be transparency, how dare you stick your nose into their great bonanza: In most countries, Defence budgets are excempt from scrutiny, austerity programs and automatically indexed.

In Egypt they are turning democratic now, so the military budget will not be eligible for transparency by Parliament and the new government. Eisenhower warned in 1961 about the military machine becoming too dominant, but nobody's been listening.
16:56 on 09/12/2011
Someone earned!
16:55 on 09/12/2011
The question has to be where is the money if the goods have not been delivered
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gumpo
16:53 on 09/12/2011
This kind of waste can only be expected when you have ministers whose primary concern is securing contracts, not saving money or buying the correct vehicles / equipment.
Just look at the likes of Liam Fox and his " mate", it's obvious there are huge rewards for the M.P.s who set up these deals.................Have you ever known a poor "ex M.P. " ?
16:20 on 09/12/2011
It is important to keep building a British tank. And keeping and making enough spares so that these tanks can be kept in service. Also we need to keep our Tank Repair facilities going. Also this provides JOBS which we also need. So we shouldn't just 'Buy off the Shelf' an American tank. In the UK we also designed some excellent multi-purpose IUD resistant vehicles. We should purchase these for ourselves then try and sell them to other countries
16:57 on 09/12/2011
I think you mean IED resistant (improvised explosive device). An IUD is something else altogether.