NHS Reform A 'Distraction' To Real Issue of £20bn Budget Savings, Say Health Chiefs

First Posted: 22/01/2012 20:21 Updated: 22/01/2012 20:39   PA

Health chiefs today said the Government's controversial NHS reforms were a "distraction" from confronting £20 billion budget savings and long-term care for the elderly.

The warning came as it was reported an influential cross-party group of MPs plans to heavily criticise the revamp of how health services are provided in England.

But ministers vowed to press on with changes, which have already been diluted from original proposals, amid calls from the Royal College of Nursing and the Royal College of Midwives to scrap the Health and Social Care Bill.

NHS Confederation chief executive Mike Farrar said today: "From the outset, we have made clear the Government's reforms to the administrative structures of the NHS are a distraction in terms of addressing these fundamental challenges.

"We are therefore increasingly worried by the lack of clinical support for the reforms and the fact clinical opposition to the changes has hardened in recent days.

"This is a major risk. We have always said that buy-in from healthcare professionals is the key to delivering a workable set of reforms.

"We need some pragmatism and realism, along with the politics, if we are to steer the NHS through these incredibly choppy waters."

Today's Observer said the Commons Health Committee would this week claim Health Secretary Andrew Lansley's shake-up was obstructing efforts to make the NHS more efficient.

The newspaper said the committee, chaired by Conservative former health secretary Stephen Dorrell, had concluded the plan to restructure the NHS and devolve more power to GPs was making it more difficult to hit efficiency savings by 2014-15.

It quoted a "late draft" of the committee's report as saying: "The reorganisation process continues to complicate the push for efficiency gains.

"Although it may have facilitated savings in some cases, we heard that it more often creates disruption and distraction that hinders the ability of organisations to consider truly effective ways of reforming service delivery and releasing savings."

The report will be published on Tuesday or Wednesday, the newspaper said.

Labour branded Mr Lansley's reforms a "monumental mistake" and demanded a rethink.

Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham said: "This report is a damning indictment of the Government's mishandling of the NHS."

But Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg warned the coalition could not "stick our head in the sand and say 'no change'".

He told BBC1's Andrew Marr Show: "People shouldn't think the best way to cherish and preserve everything that we love about the NHS is somehow to freeze it in time and then it will all be okay.

"Our view is that these reforms, by making people in the frontline more responsible for use of NHS money, actually help make the savings, not hinder it."

Health Minister Simon Burns said: "We all know the NHS is facing pressures from an ageing population and the increasing costs of medicines.

"That's why we are spending an extra £12.5 billion on the NHS. We have also made £7 billion in efficiency savings as performance has improved: record low infection rates, mixed sex wards down by over 90 per cent and people waiting over a year reduced by half.

"These will all help in the short term, but if we are to put the NHS on a sustainable footing for the future reform is essential.

"Our modernisation plan will put more power in the hands of doctors and nurses which means we are able to slash bureaucracy, saving £4.5bn that will be reinvested in better NHS services for patients.

"Pushing ahead with our modernisation plan is essential so the NHS can make the efficiency savings it needs."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Health chiefs today said the Government's controversial NHS reforms were a "distraction" from confronting £20 billion budget savings and long-term care for the elderly. The warning came as it was ...
Health chiefs today said the Government's controversial NHS reforms were a "distraction" from confronting £20 billion budget savings and long-term care for the elderly. The warning came as it was ...
Filed by Paul Vale  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:46 AM on 01/23/2012
why do they need all these useless overpaid managers is beyond me
10:29 PM on 01/23/2012
Thats right look at all those low paid bank CEO's who could be put in charge of the NHS.....
05:08 AM on 01/23/2012
To everyone who is concerned what the government is doing to our NHS... Please check out this website.. I have been a member for quite a while now.. It gives us, the people a chance to voice our concerns, to MP's about issues that we all are worried about...

http://www.38degrees.org.uk/
02:13 AM on 01/23/2012
it wil be reform after reform until they have completely destroyed the NHS
02:08 AM on 01/23/2012
But we all know Cleggy,you would be against this if you was in opposition.
02:03 AM on 01/23/2012
Why don't they have Richard Branson or somone who can run a business looking after the NHS rather than these half-wits in Westminster, who don't know if it's a s--- or a haircut they need.
10:32 PM on 01/23/2012
Thats right Richard (myHeadquatersarenowinswitzerlandtosavetax) Branston should be put in charge......
03:34 AM on 01/24/2012
That's why he and others like him are registred in Switzerland, they are so good at running businesses and making money. If you were in his shoes would you be happy to give half your profits to the Westminster clowns to squander ?
01:43 AM on 01/23/2012
I am beginning to think that this is like what is happening in the Middle East.

There people called for democracy and an end to government corruption. They protested for weeks about their aims and listed specific changes that they wanted. The protests gathered more attention over time and the protestors grew in numbers. After a while of protesting and demonstrating that they had the majority of people with them, they became fed up of asking for just change and went on to demand a change of leader and regime.

I get the feeling that we are now at the point where it is no longer the Bill that we want changed but that the leader has run out of time to react positively and he should go.

I would suggest that Cameron decides to oust him soon else it might also mirror the next step in the Middle East and when the forced change which now surely is inevitable has been completed, that the leader is put into prison for excesses. What would Lansley's excesses be, beside not taking a blind bit of attention to those who know the NHS?????
07:48 AM on 01/23/2012
if we did this as a population the rozzers would kick our heads in, in a pc way of course
08:32 AM on 01/23/2012
Do you do stand up?
12:21 AM on 01/23/2012
Is this designed to push the NHS over the edge so it falls into the grasp of private companies? You can cause so much chaos then say the NHS can’t cope so private health care must be brought in to sort out the problems. Me I would rather trust a snake to run the NHS than this man, at least I know where I stand with a snake.
11:36 PM on 01/22/2012
what mr lansley won't tell you is that there is a long line of private health companies in the usa waiting to pounce on our nhs, some of them have had their licences revoked due to mal practice, but would be legal to practice here, they are signed up ready to go, you have been warned that the nhs is in it's death throws, it's also illegal to do these changes as the present government has no mandate to do it, can you remember the queens speech including this debacle or student fees for that matter, no she did'nt, democracy does not exist in britain anymore.
10:34 PM on 01/22/2012
The public don't want these NHS reforms. We didn't like the last lot either. Labour, Con or Lib Dem, it's all the same neo-liberal claptrap that sunk the banks. No Thanks.
10:27 PM on 01/22/2012
It fell over the cliff many years ago!
11:39 PM on 01/22/2012
No, no it did not.
The NHS is , in many cases, the envy of the world.
We should try to keep it that way.
Sadly we have a government which can only see £ signs not human decency.
Quite what the Lib Dems are doing supporting these ideals defies description.
11:56 PM on 01/22/2012
If it remains free at the point of use then there's no need to worry. After 67 years of the NHS it would be political suicide for any party who tried to privatise it!
09:59 PM on 01/22/2012
I'd love to see the problem addressed of the bloated, leeching pharmaceutical companies who feed off the NHS . Those companies have been suckering the taxpayers out of goodness knows how much for medication that they sell at extortionate rates. Sure, they have to recoup the costs they incurred for "research " (don't get me started on their animal testing practices, just don't get me started because I've got a pile of ironing to do before tomorrow and I can't be distracted)...but once they've recouped their costs and made a vaguely moral degree of profit (just don't, it's sticking in my craw to put 'moral' and 'pharmaceutical company' in the same paragraph), the medicine should then either be sold to the NHS at a reduced price OR the drug companies hand over the recipe and the NHS makes a generic version. We'd save a billions. However, it'll never happen because the lobbyists for the pharmaceutical companies are incredibly powerful and will never permit any government to tinker with their continued excessive profits. Okay, back to the ironing.
10:59 PM on 01/22/2012
Yes American owned companies using Brit technology to rip off the NHS.
07:49 AM on 01/23/2012
lol@the ironing