RBS Bonus: Stephen Hester Is 'Doing A Good Job', Shareholder Says

Stephen Hester

Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 27/01/2012 12:24 Updated: 27/01/2012 15:39

Pressure is growing on Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive Stephen Hester to turn down his six-figure bonus, as politicians and unions line up against the payout. One shareholder, Paul Mumford at Cavendish Asset Management, has a different answer to the £963,000 question.

"Is he actually doing a good job, and as such, is he worth being on board, bearing in mind you have to pay the going amount? I think the answer is yes?" Mumford told the Huffington Post.

Acknowledging the "hypercritical" environment in which the decision is being made, Mumford said that Hester's pay package has to be seen in the context of the wider industry, where seven-figure bonuses are commonplace. That, he said, echoing other defenders of executive pay, is just the going rate for the kind of expertise needed to run these companies.

"That's something that everyone has to live with, I'm afraid. It is one of those industries where you do have to give high-powered rewards to get the right people along, and you're up against an international market as well, with the big American banks which had problems in the past, but where the remuneration packages are quite unseemly."

Others in the sector - in fact, others in the bank - will receive significantly more in bonuses. Investment bankers typically take a greater share of profits. In January, the FT reported that the head of RBS' investment banking arm, John Hourican, would receive £4m in bonus payments in 2012. Bob Diamond, CEO of Barclays, received £6.5m in bonuses in 2010.

The challenge ahead of the bank is a big one. A policy of international expansion under Fred "the Shred" Goodwin, Hester's predecessor, saw it follow up a relatively successful takeover of Natwest with an expensive move into the US and an ultimately disastrous acquisition of the Dutch bank ABN Amro.

That policy has been reversed under Hester, who is cutting back the investment banking division and sold off parts of the business, including, in January, its aircraft leasing operations, which raised £4.7bn.

"Now, of course, the emphasis is on a profitable bank. A bank that will recover reasonably well and the government can sell its stake, hopefully at a profit. More importantly, a bank that's actually going to be able to survive the storms that come up in the future. I think actually those objectives are gradually being achieved," Mumford said. "There's probably a fair way to go, on the basis that it is a fairly big job. But I think from the evidence to date he has been doing a reasonably good job."

"You do need a credible professional on board to steer the ship," Mumford said. "Ultimately when it comes to the downsizing and the negotiating, you have to be a relatively serious negotiator"

The success has been reflected in the share price, analysts said. RBS has been one of the better performing banks in Europe over the past year, admittedly in a field that has been weighed down by the unfolding eurozone crisis and weak economic data in the UK.

The 40% rise in its share price added around £8bn in market value, as UBS analyst John-Paul Crutchley noted on Wednesday, translates to around £6.5bn in extra value to the UK taxpayers' stake.

"With the benefit of management clearly apparent, it seems surprising that the political establishment which, we think, should be aligned with a good investment outcome for RBS shareholders, is potentially putting this at risk by raising concerns over the CEO’s remuneration," Crutchley wrote in a research note.

RBS is 83% state-owned, but the government has little power to change employment contracts, meaning that instead it has to apply pressure to Hester as an individual.

Liberal Democrat minister Jeremy Browne said that Hester should "think like a public servant" and see it as a "public duty" to turn the bonus down.

Earlier in the month, Antonio Horta-Osorio, CEO of Lloyds - which is 40% state-owned - refused to take a bonus after taking two months sick leave.

Horta-Osorio, who oversaw a £3.25bn loss in the first three quarters of 2011, said at the time that "I believe my bonus entitlement should reflect the performance of the Group but also the tough financial circumstances that many people are facing."

Mumford is not convinced that Hester should do the same. "People have asked him to give up this bonus. I don't think that's a thing that people should necessarily do," he said. "And after all, the government do get half his bonus back in tax, because he's going to be a 50% taxpayer."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Pressure is growing on Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive Stephen Hester to turn down his six-figure bonus, as politicians and unions line up against the payout. One shareholder, Paul Mumford at C...
Pressure is growing on Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive Stephen Hester to turn down his six-figure bonus, as politicians and unions line up against the payout. One shareholder, Paul Mumford at C...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:13 on 29/01/2012
Mumford said that Hester's pay package has to be seen in the context of the wider industry, where seven-figure bonuses are commonplace.

So that makes it OK does it? It is precisely that comment which is the issue. Hester just happens to be in the firing line of the moment. Can't bankers see the writing on the walls?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DaveJohnWard
08:12 on 28/01/2012
read the facts, not the b******t https://changingthebank.rbs.com/
23:40 on 27/01/2012
It's very clever to pay him in £963,000 worth of shares, at current prices thats 3.5 million shares so he only need the price to go up a few pence to make an extra £100K........
18:52 on 27/01/2012
I could care less what a private Corporation pays it's executives...go ahead, give them ALL the profit...who cares? But when that Corporation ISN'T private and the bonus is coming out of MY POCKET then it's apples and oranges. I watched today the Coalition and Cameron pass the buck on whose fault it was that this bonus in particular was handed out when Cameron himself has been giving lip service to stopping this type of thing. First Cameron said that it wasn't this administration that made the contract that allowed such a Bonus, it was LABOUR that did it..then when there was mention of the entire culture of bonuses being not popular with the Public in these dire economic times, you could have heard a pin drop. Cameron and the Torys are just giving LIP SERVICE to this Bonus fiasco..they SAY they want change and that Bankers need to take into account the Public's position as both shareholder and owner and the economic state of most everyone in the UK that earns in a year what this BANKER GETS IN A DAY. If they threaten to go elsewhere if they aren't allowed these huge bonuses, then please by all means GO. Banking isn't so difficult and such a fine art that there aren't HUNDREDS of smart, eager young people perfectly capable of doing that job if given the opportunity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
14:51 on 27/01/2012
Bet not a lot of people on these boards will like this position from Mumford but he is spot on...
11:42 on 28/01/2012
rubish. it was people like mumford that caused the problems that lead to the crash. the insurance and investment companies ( mainly pension funds) that owned the banks and as long as there was a profit at the end of the year they turned a blind eye to what the banks were doing and how the profits were aquired. if the companies had been doing their job RBS would never had been allowed to take over the dutch bank ( which caused 65 % of their problems) without at least having a look at the dutch books. santana was desperate for part of tha dutch bank but would not touch the rest of it with a barge pole - they must have looked at the books. as for that americain that walked away with $15 million pension pot yet left $15 billion debt. WHAT WERE THE SHAREHOLDERS REPRESENTATIVES DOING. no good saying it was all one mans fault. also if the contracts are now altered where will the employees who do not like the new contract go? most top banks are downsizing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
16:35 on 28/01/2012
even if a lot of people did not like the ABN deal we've seen no one (including the regulators) jumping to cancel the deal.
Shareholders are working on increasing their profits, regulators are working on making sure the system does not go upper under. Key here is that everybody was blind to the systemic risks because nobody has any interest to say to the public that debt had to stop and that a long and painful austerity period would begin.

On the fact that banks are downsizing, yes that is spot on. But this is not for someone like Hester. He has the contact he has the experience, he will have no problem finding a job that pay more. The issue is for the rank and file at RBS M&A or ECM...