Falkland Islands: HMS Dauntless, The Royal Navy's 'Cutting Edge' Deterrent (PICTURES)

Dauntless

First Posted: 3/02/2012 18:39 Updated: 3/02/2012 20:29

Amid rising tensions in the South Atlantic, the Royal Navy has deployed its most potent piece of hardware to patrol the seas around the disputed Falkland Islands.

HMS Dauntless, 8,000 tonnes of fully armed displacement, is currently sailing south at a speed of 30 knots. A type 45 destroyer, the £1billion ship is the RN's latest piece of kit, designed to provide an air defence shield for an entire task force.

Built in Glasgow and officially commissioned last year, the destroyer's maiden mission is to replace MHS Montrose as the main deterrent around the archipelago.

The 152 metre-long vessel (it's the length of 16 double decker buses) is considered one of the most advanced air defence warships in the global theatre, boasting the Sea Viper missile system, described by the Ministry of Defence as “the punch of the type 45”.

Sea Viper's strike capability has a range of up to 70 miles, while the highly maneuverable missiles, which travel at speeds in excess of Mach four, can knock drones, aircraft or even other missiles from the air, guided to their target by the Samson radar - the large top on the ship’s distinctive tall mast.

Defences also include a 4.5-inch gun on the forecastle (the forward part of the upper deck), which can fire 24, 80lbs high explosives with a range of around 12 miles for bombarding shore or sea targets, as well as two 30mm calibre guns amidships and a radar-controlled Gatling gun.

The destroyer's shape is designed to reduce its radar signature, making it appear no bigger than a trawler on an enemy's screen, while the complement of 190 British sailors travel in relative comfort, with six to a cabin and iPad chargers.

Speaking to The Huffington Post UK, Nick Brown, the editor-in-chief of Jane’s International Defence Review, highlighted the radar and the missile system as the ship’s true “cutting edge” feature.

“It’s certainly one of the most advanced air defence ships in the world,” he said.

“The US Aegis system is similar, but Sea Viper is more advanced… as it can engage multiple targets simultaneously.”

The exact figure of targets the ship can engage at once is classified, but Brown says it’s a “huge, huge number”.

“Some versions of the Type 45 can even track satellites,” he said.

Theoretically, the ship can take out incoming ballistic missiles, though Brown points out that the ship “has not proven it can do that yet”.

On the possibility of a successful attack against the ship, Brown maintains “nothing is invulnerable, however because of its above water warfare system, it’s very well protected from threats in the air."

"It has a pretty good anti-submarine warfare package as well,” he adds.

In a recent interview with The Telegraph, General Sir Mike Jackson said that it would be "just about impossible" to retake the Falklands following an invasion without aircraft carriers.

Brown is similarly cautious: “We certainly wouldn’t be able to do what we did in in ‘82," he said, "so we’d have to fight a war in a different way. We wouldn’t have aircraft that could carry out strike missions on the islands so it would be a very different type of war. We do have advanced anti-warfare capabilities and very advanced submarine capabilities, but it always depends on what type of threat you’re facing."

“The Argentines would of course be able to set their own agenda, which is always beyond the control of the Royal Navy.”

1  of  9
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
(Photo credit: Chris Ison/PA Wire)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Amid rising tensions in the South Atlantic, the Royal Navy has deployed its most potent piece of hardware to patrol the seas around the disputed Falkland Islands. HMS Dauntless, 8,000 tonnes of fu...
Amid rising tensions in the South Atlantic, the Royal Navy has deployed its most potent piece of hardware to patrol the seas around the disputed Falkland Islands. HMS Dauntless, 8,000 tonnes of fu...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 132
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:26 AM on 02/07/2012
It can still hit things and sink........
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
12:15 PM on 02/07/2012
Or things can hit it and it can sink...

The perils of sailing with the grey funnel line.
09:00 PM on 02/06/2012
One billion, 8000 tonnes. That's £125000 per tonne. It probably means a quid a kilo plus the MOD procurement fees. Like, do you know just how much a billion is? Start with around £330, 000 per islander. Can I have that spent on me please?
07:01 PM on 02/06/2012
There is only one outcome after this and that is the wages and benifits will be cut further
06:56 PM on 02/06/2012
Re Derek John's idea; d'you know, I do believe it could work !
If we had had we had him around, instead of Churchill, all those years ago, we could have given Adolf Scotland and various other unnecessary and small-minded parts of the UK , and could have saved ourselves all the bother of having to fight him for 6 years. Just shows you what a flash of genius can do. All it takes is that "What if?" attitude....
The trouble with having one ship patrolling in Falklands waters is that, sooner or later, it's going to need a tea-break. That's the time to attack ! However, with permanent air and anti-aircraft missile cover in situ, and the threat of a large nuclear submarine in the area, Argentina will definitely have to think about its options, long and hard.
04:15 PM on 02/06/2012
When I see a map of the Falklands. I see two half's Eastern half, where Port Stanley and most of the population are, and the Western half, nearest to Argentina. What if. The Westeren half was ceeded to Argentina, provided the people of the Falklands were in agreement, and Argentina agreed never to make another claim to the Eastern half. A line could be drawn through the center and all fihing and mineral rights being the right of each respective goverments. There would still be sufficient wealth in the value of oil and fishing, to make the Falkland people, one of the riches population in the world. Plus knowing there lifestye and security were secure. Just a thought.
This comment has been removed.
06:51 PM on 02/06/2012
you wud just end up with another north korea-south korea stand off but they would have home advantage,greed is what its all about ie oil
12:58 PM on 02/05/2012
these new ships look like airfix kits nothing like the previous class ie DARING , and BATTLE still thats progress ,hope they have good air cover though!
04:56 PM on 02/05/2012
You are dead right!
Airfix have a kit available for just under fifty quid.
The kit is rubbish at shooting down aircraft, though the real one is apparently the best in the business, capable of defending itself against an entire squadron of aircraft at once, some folk are actually claiming it can attack targets in earth orbit and even incoming ballistic missiles.
photo
Blacksheep1
Keeping the Left honest, 7 days a week!
10:42 AM on 02/07/2012
The US already has destroyers capable of attacking targets in orbit.....
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
12:18 PM on 02/07/2012
It can have a good try. If it performs as specified, its radar and missiles are very capable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michaelxx
12:04 PM on 02/05/2012
just another way to spend our money..have a war keep the people mentally occupied and they then make laws that take away our freedom of expression our so called rights....
I think I should be allowed to carry a gun do you?
04:25 PM on 02/05/2012
no
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michaelxx
10:48 PM on 02/05/2012
why not then...?
09:30 PM on 02/05/2012
carry a gun?..I don't think you should be allowed to carry scissors
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michaelxx
10:49 PM on 02/05/2012
Why is that?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dombeyandson
10:04 AM on 02/05/2012
Well at least you've done something positive and not looked for a war to boost your political career. Pity Thatcher didn't take the same advice and strengthen the Falklands defences all those years ago most have forgotten
04:37 PM on 02/05/2012
Why would she?
Before the Falklands conflict(at the time we weren't allowed to call it a 'war') she was ready to hand the islands over to Argentina (most folk in England had never heard of the Falkland islands and imagined they must be near Shetland somewhere), and she was dismantling the Royal Navy with her 'strategic defence revue'.
Back then she was our most unpopular PM ever. Instead of sending ships to the South Atlantic to deter the Argies like Jim Callaghan had done before her, she took away Endurance and put down a welcome mat for Argentina to come help themselves.

Low and behold Argentina invaded and when she sent the task force to put them out again she became as popular as Churchill.

Queer how these things work out, almost as if she meant it from the beginning?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dombeyandson
10:41 AM on 02/06/2012
SO history in danger of repeating itself with the Conservatives yet again conserving. You are so right Thatcher was the most unpopular PM and refused to take advice to strenghen the Falklands regardless of where they are but as ever the Tories were cuting it here cutting it there cutting it nearly everywhere, yet they made her a Dame should have been a damn. She wrecked the economy and thousands lost their livlihood and homes at a time of life not condusive to re-employment or the will to rebuild their businesses ,lost when the banks foreclosed. Why people ever vote for this mob beats me as they have no concept of building a Britain condusive to all especially when held to ransome by those who thing they are self made millionaires - no names no pack drill. An the papers just love to stir it by blaming the "scroungers" whoever they may be. I suppose Come'on has at lkeast sent a token warship but not enough meantime we run araound the world on endless missions.
10:58 PM on 02/06/2012
that's very true.. well said. She's the divil herself so she is. Hell's too good for some people and I've heard someone want's a state funeral for her. Personally I'd burn her at the stake... dead or alive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elijah Greenleaf
antidisestablishmentarianista
06:51 AM on 02/05/2012
Argentine sheep humpers can't wait to get their hands on the Falklands.
06:57 PM on 02/04/2012
War? It is human nature since human came to live on planet called earth. So the Aliens they created all this weapons tech and we just follow their rule because we get hypmisis just like that so who to blame really? Aliens only them really.
09:03 PM on 02/05/2012
try a bit more water with it
10:53 AM on 02/06/2012
Think you need to seek help.
This comment has been removed.
10:54 AM on 02/04/2012
So this ship can handle exocet missiles that the French supplied during the 1982 conflict ? Remember the' Sea Wolf' missile system that failed to stop old skyhawk jets , these sophisticated weapons are far too dependant on computers and we all know what can go wrong with them. Submarines and land based air power is the answer to defending an island. Aircraft carriers are far too vulnerable in this day and age.
09:09 PM on 02/05/2012
Exocets are now very basic anti ship missiles and operate on a predictable track which makes them easier to intercept...as a aside the French supplied Exocets to Argentina prior to the conflict when they bought their Super Etendard aircraft but not during it and actually gave Britain computer control codes for the missiles...a plot was also foiled to stop Argentina acquiring black market Exocets thru an arms dealer from what may have been a middle eastern country
09:11 PM on 02/05/2012
There is land based airpower on the Falklands
09:25 AM on 02/04/2012
Let them invade, last time they got beaten by the cream of the british forces.This time the same elite forces will win, the only difference this time will be the fact that 10 years of front line combat experience will enable a more efficient victory over a second rate army, and that is a FACT.
This comment has been removed.
photo
ycplum
Against Stupidity, the Gods themselves try in Vain
04:22 PM on 02/06/2012
Without air assets, any military expedition wpuld be doomed. If I recall, all you aircraft carriers are going offline for a couple of years. I believe that is what teh article was implying. There will be a window of vulnerability in the next few years.
08:53 PM on 02/06/2012
there are air assets stationed on the Falklands
This comment has been removed.
08:12 AM on 02/04/2012
hmmm - pictures of D32, D33, D34 and D35? Either there is a new Navy policy of confusing the enemy by changing a ships designation regularly or this ship has a serious identiity crisis! Of course it couldn't be the cheapskate photo editors couldn't be bothered to put in the time and effort to get sufficient photos of the correct ship could it?
10:14 PM on 02/04/2012
oops - must have hit a nerve as they have reduced the number of photos and got rid of all but one of the photos of other ships - the photo of the ship head on banking as it turns is still D34 but at least they tried.
11:39 PM on 02/06/2012
AND they cost 6.5 billion pounds each.. NOT 1 billion