Passenger Aircraft Forced To Make Emergency Landing At Belfast International Airport

Huffington Post UK  
First Posted: 7/02/2012 11:12 Updated: 7/02/2012 14:32

A passenger aircraft carrying 175 people has been forced to make an emergency landing at Belfast International Airport.

Emergency crews were standing by close to the runway as the Thomas Cook Airbus A320 heading to Tenerife circled above ahead of the landing, authorities said.

The captain reported landing gear problems shortly after take off.

An airport spokeswoman said the airport was put on "full emergency standby".

However the plane landed safely at Belfast around 11.25 am on Tuesday.

Air traffic control company Nats said the plane touched down without incident.

Aircraft trackers showed the airliner, TCX25MR, circling above Lough Neagh ahead of the landing.

The plane spent more than an hour in the air so as to lose fuel before the emergency landing.

Above: the Thomas Cook plane circles above Belfast as it prepares to make its emergency landing, as shown on a tracking website.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

 
 
  • Comments
  • 97
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:57 on 08/02/2012
I don't know anything about it all; other than what the report says.I reckon had I been in that plane I would have been scared. I reckon the pilot and his crew were well trained in what to do and did it. I think the pilot also knew about the particular aircraft he was flying and took the actions appropriate to that aircraft. I am glad everyone landed safely. I think most of the posts debating the actions of the pilot and aircraft are supersition and are to be disregarded. I think there are too many "experts" out there who know better. I hope everyone has a really good day.
07:12 on 08/02/2012
Nothing much to say really except some of the comments on here are humerous and sometimes a bit near the knuckle, I love it and it makes me laugh.
04:56 on 08/02/2012
i was on a airbus a320 when its hydrolics failed on landing at gatwick on jan 3 2012 from cuba is it safe to fly with them any more with there money troubles ..theres cutting costs and cutting corners
are thomas cook cutting corners to keep going
08:27 on 08/02/2012
It would help brianjj if your first language was English - Can anyone interpret this sentence?
23:31 on 07/02/2012
jenglow wrote:
"yes, unlike the 'anoraks' and plabe spotters who have written so much drivel on this subject, I infact worked on Condors Boeing fleet in Frankfurt for over 5 years. If it had been a B757, it would not have needed to burn off fuel, as its maximun approved landing weight, is much higher than an A320"

Well that's more drivel.
The maximum take off weight of a 757-300 exceeds the maximum landing weight by about 6000lbs, so it may well have needed to burn off fuel before landing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norman Mitchison
20:05 on 07/02/2012
Good to read some cheerful news for a change, well done that Pilot.
19:27 on 07/02/2012
Anybody with any fear of flying should read a book called, Fling Without Fear and they will feel 100% better the next time they fly, honest!! brilliant book, james mcclean scotland.
17:43 on 07/02/2012
Many of us chose to fly to our destinations and the vast majority of flights are smooth and without problems. There will be a few mishaps as there are on our roads Railways etc, but thank goodness they are few. We must put our trust in the hands of Professional pilots be they in the air or on the ground. Life must go on.
15:36 on 07/02/2012
I will never forget the time my daughters flight had to return following take off due to a massive bird strike. I nearly fainted on the spot at the thought of them landing with one burning engine.
Luckily the pilot released the fuel from the plane. Following an emergancy landing in crash positions with fire engines at the ready etc they landed safetly. It is horrendous..My thoughts are with these passangers and their families..
17:39 on 07/02/2012
It does get the heart racing doesn't it!!
15:28 on 07/02/2012
If it had to burn off fuel why the hell did it not achieve this by going to its destination. Its still got to land somewhere problem or not.
15:56 on 07/02/2012
yes, but it is infinitely preferable to be very close to a runway and all the emergency facilities should the emergency start to get worse, don't you think?
16:15 on 07/02/2012
The less fuel the smaller the fire. Learned that in WW2.
15:11 on 07/02/2012
Oh dear, ignorance is bliss I supose. The uneducated reporting and comments are astounding.
It is perfectly normal when receieving a warning advice in the cockpit to use up some fuel, because you cannot dump it on and Airbus & some Boeings to acheive a safe landing weight. It could just be a faulty sensor or an undercarriage door not secure. All quite normal things on all aircraft.
17:44 on 07/02/2012
I had not read your comment first ... honest ... albeit ... am totally in agreement :-)
14:52 on 07/02/2012
Glad I was not on that plane!
17:46 on 07/02/2012
I don't understand that comment ... why not? No one was hurt ....
18:21 on 07/02/2012
Because I hate flying, and the thought that something might happen would scare me witless!
14:28 on 07/02/2012
Oh, Forgot to add. The picture in the headline is a A321 not a A320.
15:31 on 07/02/2012
No it`s not - the picture on the front page is a Boeing 757
15:44 on 07/02/2012
The picture at the head of the article, is in fact one of a Boeing 757-300, and not an Airbus of any type. This library picture was taken, before we installed winglets on the entire B757 fleet, in 2010 and early 2011.
yes, unlike the 'anoraks' and plabe spotters who have written so much drivel on this subject, I infact worked on Condors Boeing fleet in Frankfurt for over 5 years. If it had been a B757, it would not have needed to burn off fuel, as its maximun approved landing weight, is much higher than an A320. I doubt if the hour was spent just burning off fuel. The Captain would have been in contact with maintenance control, for guidance on what measures could be taken to rectify, or establish the fault.
17:48 on 07/02/2012
It is so good to hear information based on knowledge .... thank you x
14:22 on 07/02/2012
The reason it had to circle for so long is the A320 hasn't got a facility to dump fuel. So had to burn it off instead.
14:22 on 07/02/2012
More poor reporting by the Huffington Post. The A320 can carry around 220 passengers and crew, not 150 as stated in the article.
14:46 on 07/02/2012
can but how do you know it was full???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisctpaul
Things can only get better
14:48 on 07/02/2012
Article says the flight was carrying 175 people. It says nothing about how many passengers the plane can carry.
15:23 on 07/02/2012
Interestingly, since my earlier posting about the article incorrectly stating the A320 having a capacity of 150 people, the article has been edited and re-worded! I do stand slightly corrected though as it appears the normal maximum capacity is nearer 180 and not 220 as I suggested.
17:19 on 07/02/2012
I may be showing my Scottish ignorance here, but in Scotland , when a means of public transport states that it is carrying 175 passengers, notwithstanding the air crew, this usually implies people.
14:22 on 07/02/2012
Had this happen at least 15 years ago on an Orlando Virgin Flight from Gatwick. Captain had reported problem with front landing wheel not going up correctly on take off. We flew past control tower, who confirmed the wheel was still down. We then circled above Southampton to use up fuel, then landed back to Gatwick under emergency conditions. All was well if a bit hairy on landing, as the pilot kept the front wheel of the deck to the very last moment, a great skilll. We were then kept onboard as the landing gear was checked and the plane refuled. On inspection the cause of the wheel "sticking down" was found to be a safety pin not being removed by ground staff. Ah well alls well that ends well, three hour delay, a free drink or two from Virgin and no doubt a bollocking for the maintenance man.:-)
17:17 on 07/02/2012
Is the locking pin not what the operator shows to the captain before pushback?
17:51 on 07/02/2012
But ............... you lived to tell the tale .... thankfully :-)