There Are Shadows Of Charles Dickens's World In Ours, Says Nick Gibb Over Literacy Problems

PA/Huffington Post   First Posted: 07/02/2012 14:58 GMT Updated: 07/02/2012 16:09 GMT

Despite two centuries of change, many disadvantaged children are still facing the same literacy problems experienced in Victorian times, claims the schools minister

Nick Gibb warned that there are "shadows of Dickens's world in our own". He called for schools to be "more ambitious" in encouraging children to read to a high standard, and suggested that all pupils should have read at least one Dickens novel by the end of their teenage years.

Reaching the expected standard in reading should be the "minimum expected", he added.

In a speech at a south London secondary school, Gibb said 60% of white boys eligible for free school meals - a measure of poverty - cannot read properly at the age of 14 and only two thirds of boys eligible for free dinners read at the expected level at seven.

Speaking on the 200th anniversary of Dickens's birth, Gibb said that in the author's time, "literacy was a gift for the few".

"Today, almost everyone reads and writes," he said. "We blog, we tweet, report, comment, email and update to an astonishing extent.

"The chief executive of Google, Eric Schmidt, estimated we create as much information every two days on the internet as was produced in the entire history of mankind up until 2003.

"But even after two centuries of technological and social revolution, there are still shadows of Dickens's world in our own - with literacy problems remaining asymmetric and heavily orientated towards the poorest in our communities."

Gibb added: "We need - if you'll forgive the Dickens pun - much greater expectations of children in reading."

He warned that the numbers of children reading at Level 5 or over - the standard above that expected of 11-year-olds has stalled.

"The challenge for schools today is to be more ambitious," Gibb said. "Ask whether the 'expected level' is actually good enough. We can't pretend we don't have a problem - or pretend that the 'expected' level is good enough.

"We need to raise our sights beyond 'ok'. By the end of primary school, we want children to be able to read fluently, to interpret a book's meaning, and be able to enjoy more complex books by the likes of [Michael] Morpurgo, [Jacqueline] Wilson and [Roald] Dahl.

"Every young person should have read at least one Dickens novel by the end of their teenage years."

Gibb suggested that computer games and TV are distracting youngsters from reading, later adding that sometimes young people should "actively" choose a book over such activities.

"One could argue that young people have many competing (and important) demands on their time with the attractions of social media, TV, games consoles and smart phones," he said.

"But it is gravely concerning to see this country's young people falling out of love with reading, especially when literature still has such a unique and irreplaceable part to play in our lives."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK UNIVERSITIES & EDUCATION

 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
21:02 on 07/02/2012
Unfortunately the young fall out of love with reading because schools are forced to be too concerned with making them cram for exams. There is no reading for pleasure anymore in schools, and if it is not in the culture at home...there's your problem right there. At least the Primaries are doing ok, according to the report. That's something.
18:33 on 07/02/2012
Even in the states its true in parts of the inner cities and rural areas. The suburbs get the better public shools. The Universities are very good though and so are most 4 year colleges. But often Dickensonian peasant things go on in the states, riots in big box stores to get a new electronic time waster, street urchin crime for lack of a better time. I dont know if Dicken's ever wrote about drugs but I am sure they had that back then with the opium trade. Some people even speak Dickensonian muffled muddled words thru street lingo and grunts. If you watch old black and white movies on TV they spoke excellant English, crisp, clear, sophisticated, and wore nice jackets ties, suits, and classy dresses. And of course even a nice sitting hat, not a ruffin ball cap on backwards or hoody. My how have things changed since then when we slid out of the Dickenson mold a bit for a generation. Now its back to the 1800's really where a tee shirt and baggy hanging shorts and sneakers is total style, looking good. yikes!
This comment has been removed.