HuffPost Social Reading

Britain Pushing For UN Resolution On Somalia To Tackle Piracy

Somali Pirate

First Posted: 17/02/2012 08:20 Updated: 17/02/2012 08:32   PA

Britain is pushing for a United Nations resolution that would help pull Somalia back from the grip of pirates and terrorists.

UN Security Council experts are discussing a strategy that would see the African Union force in Somalia extended from 12,000 to about 17,700 troops.

A spokesman for the UK mission to the UN said it wanted to "take advantage of what we see as a window of opportunity" to render al-Shabab militants "ineffective as a military force".

A draft resolution is expected to be circulated today, with a view to the resolution being adopted on Wednesday, a day before Britain stages a major conference aimed at breaking up the "business model" used by pirates in Somalia.

Senior representatives from more than 40 governments and international organisations will attend the London Somali Conference, starting on February 23 and hosted by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, which aims to develop a new approach to tackle the threat of piracy.

Sir Mark Lyall Grant, the UK's ambassador to the UN, has said the purpose of the conference is to take advantage of the opportunity created by the military pressure on al-Shabab by a combination of the AU force, known as Amisom, and Kenyan forces.

Meanwhile, a new state-of-the-art global anti-piracy centre was unveiled today.

The intelligence hub has been set up by analysts Dryad Maritime in Portsmouth, Hampshire, to manage an international response to the threat of pirates which is costing shipping companies millions of pounds each year.

The centre is manned round-the-clock by a team of ex-Royal Navy warfare specialists and intelligence experts.

A Dryad Maritime spokeswoman explained: "Home to some impressive, state-of-the-art technology, the centre is pivotal in monitoring and analysing the movements, assaults and trends of pirate action groups around the world.

"To seafarers, the centre is a lifeline. It tells them where the pirates are, where they are headed and what they look like.

"When too close for comfort, the centre warns ships and they are diverted to safer waters."

Karen Jacques, chief operating officer at Dryad Maritime, said: "We expect the threat from piracy to continue, we are investing heavily in infrastructure and technology to give our clients an outsourced operations centre that rivals any naval force.

"Utilising analysis-led maritime intelligence can save on average three to four days for a vessel in transit with related savings to charterers and ship-owners on bunkers, hire and the employment of physical security teams amounting to around 90,000 US dollars to 220,000 US dollars per transit."

Dryad Maritime is a specialist maritime intelligence company employed by shipping firms to identify threats from piracy, terrorism and other criminal activity and to provide practical advice on how to avoid these.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Britain is pushing for a United Nations resolution that would help pull Somalia back from the grip of pirates and terrorists. UN Security Council experts are discussing a strategy that would see th...
Britain is pushing for a United Nations resolution that would help pull Somalia back from the grip of pirates and terrorists. UN Security Council experts are discussing a strategy that would see th...
Filed by Michael Rundle  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
17:26 on 18/02/2012
the UN? Isn't that what the British navy is for? Get some of those three masted ships of storage and shine up a few sabers and get to it.
20:42 on 17/02/2012
I heard one figure of $12 Billion dollars as a caost est. for Naval, Private Security & fuel costs to all nations transiting these waters. Surely some Coastal development would not cost that much & be a step toward ending the misery that birthed this problem.
Today the Pirates own the Coast & enjoy local support, therefore it will not end until that support ebbs.
Get on with it, as all costs are past on to we the paying public in one form or another- work hard or work smart? That's what I say.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kritikos
Intelligence is not a science
17:59 on 17/02/2012
'ARrrrr,....... dem dat's dead 'll be da lucky ones'.......~Long John Silver
15:14 on 17/02/2012
Why not start by asking the UN to request nations over-fishing Somali waters, leaving this poor nation; long dependent upon fish as a major source of protein, to quit? Why not ASK THE UN TO BAN THE DUMPING OF RADIOACTIVE AND TOXIC WASTE IN THOSE SAME WATERS BY OTHER NATIONS? Both of the above constitute the ONLY reason that this SOMALI PIRATE business started in the first place, and only AFTER they had begged and begged, both those other nations, and the UN, for help. Their people were starving, and their babies dying from an unbelievable cancer cluster. Let's start there first. Then you will see the 'Somali Pirate' problem quietly disappear. And didn't you crlitics notice that those whom these 'pirates' kidnapped were always fed and treated well, including medical help for those who were ill, and carefully returned, including their ships, when ransoms had been paid? That is, until the US, FRANCE, ENGLAND, SENT ARMED NAVAL SHIPS IN, AND STARTED SHOOTING AT AND KILLING THEM.
16:56 on 17/02/2012
How on earth can you write such stuff?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
C Karen Stopford
03:59 on 18/02/2012
Read up on it. He's right. It is so tiresome to see comments from people with this Pollyanna view of the world. US and Great Britain are able to keep people like you and me fat, dumb and happy only by brutally oppressing entire nations. They happen to be inhabited by non-white people, and they don't really have access to major media, so apparently it's OK. We were the ones who created Al-Qaeda, we were the ones that destroyed Vietnam, we are the ones selling arms to the oppressive regime in Bahrain, we were the ones that gave Saddam the arms to go after Iran - I could go on and on, And when some people dare to fight back, well - our propaganda machine turns them into demons. More people need to wake up and really take a look at history, and stop believing what they see on "reality TV."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hardknocks
the future is unwritten
13:53 on 17/02/2012
A literate society that is free from oppression should be the goal of all countries unfortunately this vicious cycle of hunger and survival overrides everything else.

If you control the food supply you control the people.
13:32 on 17/02/2012
The U.N. is impotent and should be treated as such.
As long as its members refuse to be relevant, it will be ignored by the rest of the nations.
The U.N. has become like a docile old man yelling at the kids playing in his yard.
13:28 on 17/02/2012
This problem has some linkage to food global poverty in my view. Hungry people are more likely to rebel. That's why the USA used to ship tonnes of grain to the Soviet Union in order to help maintian social order there. If a UN led force could restore stability to Somalia - elected goverment/weapons amnesty - whilst at the same time neutralising Islamic militants then the piracy issue might just 'disappear'..
13:00 on 17/02/2012
Once the UN is on the case it'll be problem solved in no time flat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cogent
12:40 on 17/02/2012
easy way to get way of pirates. address poverty in Somalia.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
13:14 on 17/02/2012
Yeah, that is certainly true.

But as long as the warlords are still a force, no amount of aid will get to the needy.
apiazza
There is no such thing as a fiscal conservative.
13:26 on 17/02/2012
Shoot them. That is a way better solution.
17:27 on 18/02/2012
Send in the Drones. I think taht was a song by judy collins
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sunil Weliwitigoda
12:16 on 17/02/2012
If the British Navy can sail thousands of miles to seize other people's lands like they did to the Argentinian Falklands, why can't they send in their Navy to tackle the Pirates, instead of trying to move UN Resolutions. The British did not go for UN Resolutions either, when they invaded Iraq on false WMD posession charges.
12:47 on 17/02/2012
You may want to read a history book. There were no humans on the Falkland Islands when it was found by British explorers. The French did the first settlement there on East Falkland. Then the British did a settlement on West Falkland.

There is a reason why the 11th generation Falklenders are of British descent, speak English and the Falk Island are self goverenered and vote to remain British.
It's because Britian has had settlements there for centuries.

"The British did not go for UN Resolution­s either, when they invaded Iraq on false WMD posession charges."

You mean the US dumbkoff!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sunil Weliwitigoda
13:13 on 17/02/2012
Yes, it was the US who broke all international conventions and went against the UN, in invading Iraq on false premises of possessing WMD's. The British, the poodle of the USA, went along with the USA on this issue. So, don't put the entire blame on the USA, my dear chap. Accomplices to murder are equally guilty, before the law.
14:17 on 17/02/2012
If the British Navy can sail thousands of miles to seize other people's lands like they did to the Argentinia­n Falklands,

Pray tell how the British could seize the Falklands from the Argentinians when the Falklands have never belonged to the Argentinians? I'm sorry to upset your obviously prejudiced view but the Argentinians themselves aggressively invaded the Falklands in 1982. The Falkland Islanders, however, do not wish to be Argentinian they wish to remain British. Have you not heard of people's right self-determination?

Since it seems you so disapprove of the British Navy/military, why do you want them to sail for Somalia to tackle pirates?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sunil Weliwitigoda
14:33 on 17/02/2012
The British invade a place, put their settlers down and then these settlers want want to be British and be ruled by Britain. Nice cosy set up. As for tackling the Somali pirates, all I said was the British navy that could sail thousands of miles to grab other peoples lands, could just tackle them direct without going for UN Resolutions, just like they did in collusion with the USA, when they invaded Iraq on false premises of non - existent WMD possession, without bothering about UN Resolutions, indeed against UN views in fact.
12:08 on 17/02/2012
Never mind Somalia. What about getting the benefit pirates and benefit terrosists out of Britain?
15:53 on 17/02/2012
why not let the Somalians sign on to the British benefit system, we could send the money out to them save them coming over here, then they all have money
11:59 on 17/02/2012
Quote "To seafarers, the centre is a lifeline. It tells them where the pirates are, where they are headed and what they look like."...so if they know where they are and what they look like then why not get rid of them? Seems to be a lot of effort around a simple problem. Dead pirates can't hurt you!
11:56 on 17/02/2012
Piracy & Toxic Waste -
The threat of Somali piracy to the shipping industry must be dealt with. But the shipping industry's threat to the Somali people by dumping hazardous toxic waste, including nuclear in Somali waters and illegally fishing in Somali waters also must be dealt with.
Both sides face threats, but without a doubt, the shipping industry is more of a threat to Somalis, than Somalis are a threat to them, but both sides are wrong and must be stopped. Imagine the consequences and our reaction, if foreign ships were dumping hazardous toxic waste, including nuclear in American territorial waters?

- http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article22428.htm

- http://www.infowars.com/you-are-being-lied-to-about-pirates/
12:49 on 17/02/2012
Care to explain why the pirate leaders use the money they get to buy themselves bling such as humvees and gold plated AKs?

The pirates seize food shipments and sell the food on the black market at prices the vast majority of somali people cannot afford to buy.

Sorry the pirates are causing the starvation of millions of their own people. The fishing that was done was not feeding millions of their own people.
14:39 on 17/02/2012
It seems you did not read the links below my original post. Some of what you are saying may have some truth in it, but that does not excuse the far greater crime of dumping hazardous toxic waste, including nuclear, in Somali waters, which causes all kinds of medical problems and even death and will continue to do so for a long time. How would you react, if someone dumped toxic waste, including nuclear, at your house?
Among any group of people there are rotten apples, but none of that justifies Foreign ships committing crimes against them, just as these crimes do not justify Somali piracy.
The fishing may have not been feeding everyone, but do foreign ships have a right to fish in their waters illegally.
Somalia like any other country will never be crime-free, but the issue of piracy needs to be tackled together with toxic waste dumping.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:24 on 17/02/2012
In WW11, the gerries used to use phoney cargo boats to attract other merchant ships, then suddenly throw down the sides and open fire. Why can't we use this same tried and trusted method? Instead of giving them a lift back to an island and confiscating their boats and weapons we should be sinking the b*stards, kit and all but no, this will affect their human rights...when is the world going to wake up to the fact that pirates and terorrists don't deserve a second thought...blow them out of the water.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stefan Bast
Just a punk from Hamburg, Germany.
11:54 on 17/02/2012
The problem is not humane rights, the problem is, it won't work. Those pirates are risking their lives anyway, to being lost at sea after an engine break down, to drown if the boarding does not work, or just to be shot by someone on the vessel or by a nearby military vessel.

So your glorious idea of putting out some bait ships would not change the pirate's personal risk calculation dramatically, unless you replace all the trade ships with bait ships.
Which is obviously not practical, if you still want to continue to trade.

How many bait ships would you put out. 1 for every 1000 traders? 1 for every 100? 1 for every 10?

I know, there is that old sentiment about lily-livered liberals, that makes a lot of self-identifying conservatives believe, that basically anything could be solved, with just applying a bit more cruelty to the solutions, scaring "the bad guys" off in consequence. That train of thought is only convincing for cowards, who are themselves scared off easily.

Practical experience teaches over and over, that deterrence alone has its limits, and those limits can't be overcome by following sadistic impulses.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
17:40 on 17/02/2012
that's the point I'm making deterrence is not an option if the filfth are released and allowed to go on their way. Best to blow them to bits.
12:04 on 17/02/2012
You are right, pirates and terrorists are criminals, but so are the foreign ships, that are dumping hazardous toxic waste, including nuclear in Somali waters and illegally fishing in them too.
Please read my other post in this thread for more details.
11:00 on 17/02/2012
......but where are they now???