Israel 'Unwise' To Launch Military Strike On Iran, Says William Hague

Iran

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 19/02/2012 09:13 Updated: 19/02/2012 13:21

William Hague has said it would be a mistake for Israel to launch a military strike against Iran in an attempt to destroy its alleged nuclear weapons programme.

Speaking on the BBC's Andrew Marr programme on Sunday morning, the foreign secretary said Israel should put its efforts into making sure there were effective sanctions against Tehran.

"I don't think the wise thing for Israel to do is launch a military attack," he said.

There are growing fears that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will not be deterred by sanctions, the preferred route of the US and Britain to pressure the regime into abandoning its nuclear weapons programme.

Israel is rumoured to be planning military strikes within months. Ahmadinejad claimed this week that Iran had loaded its first domestically-made fuel rod into a nuclear reactor.

Hague said that Israel had not shown the British government any plans for an attack on Iran but acknowledged there had been some discussion by Israeli politicians in public about the possibility of a strike.

"They are not sharing any plans with us, they are not asking us to join in any plans, we are not calling for any military action against Iran," he said.

He added: "Our approach is 100% diplomatic and economics focused."

However he said that "no one wants Iran to have nuclear weapons" and said Britain did not take "any option off the table".

Hague warned there would be only two outcomes for Iran if they developed a nuclear bomb, either "they will be attacked and there will be a war, or there will be a Cold War".

He also said that Tehran had recently “increased its willingness" for "utterly illegal activities" including terrorist acts around the world. However he said he had no specific information that it intended to target the London Olympics.

On Saturday Hague warned that Iran's nuclear ambitions could plunge the world into "a new Cold War" with the Middle East.

He predicted a nuclear arms race among rival Middle Eastern states that would carry the dangers without the safety mechanisms of the old rivalry between the West and the USSR.

In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, he a warned there was a "crisis coming down the tracks" that could result in "disaster" for world affairs.

"(The Iranians) are clearly continuing their nuclear weapons programme," Hague said.

"If they obtain nuclear weapons capability, then I think other nations across the Middle East will want to develop nuclear weapons.

"And so, the most serious round of nuclear proliferation since nuclear weapons were invented would have begun with all the destabilising effects in the Middle East. And the threat of a new Cold War in the Middle East without necessarily all the safety mechanisms. That would be a disaster in world affairs."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

William Hague has said it would be a mistake for Israel to launch a military strike against Iran in an attempt to destroy its alleged nuclear weapons programme. Speaking on the BBC's Andrew Marr pr...
William Hague has said it would be a mistake for Israel to launch a military strike against Iran in an attempt to destroy its alleged nuclear weapons programme. Speaking on the BBC's Andrew Marr pr...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 141
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
11:52 PM on 02/20/2012
Israel has the right to defend itself. Israel has the right to launch preemptive attacks. Israel has no real obligation to listen to the US. But...should Israel give the US the finger (again) and launch against Iran, I would say "Go for it! Good luck! But....your own your own!".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sillyfrog
Pastafarian and UU student
06:45 PM on 02/20/2012
I think all ballistics are the cowards way of settling disputes.
04:52 PM on 02/20/2012
If Israel attacks, then any progress that has or would have been made through the use of sanctions will have been for nothing. Israel will look like the aggressor and will recieve no backing from it's allies. And, if the US was to assist, then we will be seen as the bad guys. Attacking Iran is not the answer to the situation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greg Mirsky
Riga dimd, Riga dimd, Kas to Rigu dimdinaj?
05:58 PM on 02/20/2012
Mr.Hague have said himself that sanctions have not yet achieved any noticeable result they've were intended for. With help of Russia, China, Turkey, Brazil, Venezuela among many others, Ayatollah regime in Tehran stirs around all "tough" sanctions.
Another Cold War? Highly unlikely as there's no united front of countries willing to build new Iron War.
01:16 PM on 02/20/2012
Whem William Hague speaks, the whole world listens in silence, and then breaks its sides laughing !
lastpost
see biography
01:14 PM on 02/20/2012
"I don't think the wise thing for Israel to do is launch a military attack," he said.
Now Iran. Can we have your oil back?
02:43 AM on 02/20/2012
Just don`t drag the United States in this mess. We have our own problems domestically.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George McAulay
Delighted to meet you
01:22 AM on 02/20/2012
If only Israel didn't exist. A so called promised land that has caused so much death and destruction eleswhere
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
11:21 PM on 02/19/2012
Iran could well have a sufficient stockpile of highly enriched uranium necessary to create a nuclear weapon within a few months as shown in this article:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2012/02/nuclear-iran-worlds-new-reality.html

It looks like the world will soon have a new member of the "nuclear weapons states".
This comment has been removed.
10:08 PM on 02/19/2012
Oy Vey!
10:29 PM on 02/19/2012
...holy
Cow
08:56 PM on 02/19/2012
The USA and everyone else involved should tell Israel, in no uncertain terms, that if they attack Iran, they are on their own.

And as for Iran, if they ever have nuclear weapons, remind them that the penalty for a pre-emptve nuclear would result in their total destruction, Their beautiful and very large country would be turned back to lifeless sand.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisctpaul
Things can only get better
09:24 PM on 02/19/2012
Can't agree with you more.
10:04 PM on 02/19/2012
Mazel tov!
10:33 PM on 02/19/2012
i agree completely!
read more@ http://goo.gl/WjeOW
08:51 PM on 02/19/2012
What puzzles me is how the international community doesn't recognise an obvious strategy to reduce tensions and promote peace and stability in the region: Encourage Teheran to extend diplomatic recognition of Israel and exchange ambassadors. Think of what that could do for the good of all!
10:17 PM on 02/19/2012
If only zenju..
This comment has been removed.
07:20 PM on 02/19/2012
Just a couple points: Israel has been systematically 'removing' Iran's top nuclear scientists these past few years and will continue to do so.

If William Hague really thinks the Israeli's are going to confide their intentions with the British government given that relationships history, well, perhaps he should start selling second hand cars.

My experience suggests the Israeli's don't need a green light from the US either, they've been fighting this battle for survival for thousands of years, they're still here and will be long after their enemies have tripped off to 'paradise'.
12:55 AM on 02/20/2012
I could not agree more. What gives Obama the right to tell a country that he had made a commitment in front of the world to support under no uncertain terms.So he gets the Jewish vote,while he lies through his teeth and makes nice with the %$#*&^"s
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
myplenny
03:46 AM on 02/20/2012
You cant take others land for thousands of years.
This comment has been removed.