Stamp Price Increase Backed By MPs

Posted: 2/03/2012 13:35 Updated: 2/03/2012 13:35   PA

Royal Mail

MPs today backed increases in the price of stamps despite expressing concerns about the impact on vulnerable consumers and small firms.

The Business Select Committee said it was "appropriate" for first class stamps to increase above the current 46p, and 36p for second class post.

But the MPs raised fears about the possible effect of higher prices on the amount of mail posted, and the impact on some customers.

The committee also voiced concerns that higher stamp prices could operate as a disincentive to efficiency measures.

An announcement is expected shortly from Royal Mail on higher prices, although the cost of posting Christmas cards will be the same as last year for vulnerable consumers.

Adrian Bailey (Labour, West Bromwich West), chairman of the select committee, said: "There is no doubt that market uncertainty is placing significant, additional pressures on Royal Mail and that some increase in the price of stamps is necessary.

"However, this report highlights the need for Royal Mail to consider robust data on the position of vulnerable consumers and small businesses when determining the future prices of stamps.

"It must also be sensitive to the possible effect on its volume of business and the need for higher prices not to operate as a disincentive against efficiency measures.

"The principle of universal access underpins our mail service and must be maintained at an affordable rate."

Mr Bailey warned that some smaller companies might find higher stamp prices a "real problem" in the current economic climate.

The MPs said stamp prices in the UK were among the lowest in Europe, but had increased from 36p and 27p three years ago.

In consultation with the regulator Ofcom, Royal Mail argued that any price cap should be restricted to second class letters, and set at the 55p upper end of Ofcom's proposed range, while stressing that prices would not necessarily increase to this level.

The Royal Mail is planning to hold Christmas stamp prices this year for around five million people on pension credit and employment and support allowance, but the MPs said they had "substantial concerns" about how the scheme will work in practice.

"Royal Mail will need to reassure us that this initiative will not be open to fraud and will not be introduced as a crude form of means testing," said the report.

The MPs recommended that Ofcom should consider linking any stamp price cap with CPI inflation rather than the usually higher RPI.

A Royal Mail spokesman said: "We know how hard it is to ask for a price rise when the economy is as tough as it is now. Last year our core mail business made a £2 million loss every week. Royal Mail has made a loss on its core mails, including packets, activities of almost £1 billion over the last four financial years. That is not a sustainable position for any business.

"Royal Mail is awaiting the outcome of Ofcom's consultation on its proposals for future regulation of UK postal services before announcing stamp prices for 2012. No final decisions have been made on stamp prices. We will of course inform customers of any changes to stamp prices as soon as we are able to."

The postal organisation said it faced "serious financial challenges", after mail volumes fell by 30% since 2006 and the regulatory regime led to "artificially low" prices.

"Our difficult financial position means that there has been significant under-investment in Royal Mail for a number of years, including in crucial areas like IT where we really lag behind our main competitors.

"We have some of the lowest stamp prices in Europe and amongst the highest service standards. They are very expensive to maintain. To maintain this vital service, price rises are really needed, given Royal Mail's financial position.

"We will be announcing a scheme for this Christmas that will allow the most vulnerable members of society to buy first and second class stamps at 2011 prices. Even though research has shown that postage accounts for a modest proportion of household expenditure for all social groups, we understand that there are some people for whom any price rise will be difficult. It is important to help them at this time."

Communication Workers Union (CWU) general secretary Billy Hayes said: "We welcome the report on stamp prices and the recognition of concerns about pricing from vulnerable groups.

"We believe it's a question of fairness and there's a need to establish a level playing field where competition exists while protecting the universal 'one-price-goes-anywhere' service.

"The CWU will strive to ensure no-one is priced out of accessing the universal service. Our view is that price controls should be maintained in this area to provide adequate protection."

Robert Hammond, of Consumer Focus, said: "Royal Mail faces a huge challenge in turning the business round and maintaining a universal one-price service, but that must not lead to unjustified hikes in stamp prices.

"This is an essential service and the right balance must be struck between the needs of the business and its customers.

"Stamp prices are likely to rise but any increases must be based on a convincing analysis of the market and Royal Mail's costs."

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

MPs today backed increases in the price of stamps despite expressing concerns about the impact on vulnerable consumers and small firms. The Business Select Committee said it was "appropriate" for f...
MPs today backed increases in the price of stamps despite expressing concerns about the impact on vulnerable consumers and small firms. The Business Select Committee said it was "appropriate" for f...
Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GingerlyColors
No will to change it, no right to criticize it
07:07 AM on 03/03/2012
The reason why Royal Mail is being forced to raise stamp prices is due to Royal Mail being forced to handle it's competitors mail at a loss, due to a pricing structure fixed in stone by the previous regulator, POSTCOMM. Royal Mail for many years have delivered what you may call 'junk mail' which made a profit, allowing RM to cross-subsidise the stamped letter (social mail) which accounts for only about 5% of the mail handled. Unfortunately RM has lost half of it's Mailsort (so called 'Junk Mail') to firms like TNT, DHL and UK Mail. The service is called downstream access. Due to these losses stamped mail, which RM has to go out and collect from roadside pillar boxes whether they are in cities or remote rural areas, have to increase in price. Rather than having to hike up the price of stamps, the government should allow Royal Mail to compete on a level playing field which will mean that the other firms will have to be prepared to put their own delivery postmen on the streets, delivering direct to the address. Whether they will find some mug to walk about in the rain with six bags on his bag while being chased by dogs at National Minimum Wage is their problem. By the way if the price of stamps went up with inflation since the introduction of the Penny Black in 1840, we'd be paying around £10 to send a letter nowadays!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
05:49 AM on 03/03/2012
Good way to make the Mail competitive. I use email and faxes - snail mail is a thing of the past and increasing prices does nothing to help keep it going.
02:29 AM on 03/03/2012
surely if as they say the PO lost £2 million pounds a week does"nt that tell them something is dramaticaly wrong with the way its run ?? they introduced letter box style priceing of letters & small parcels so they could increase the costs by stealth,I sent a business style brown envelope containing 3 A4 pages,rather than create folds i just gently folded them & slid them into the envelope,at the post office they tried to slide it through this letter box sizing contraption & it would not go through it was to fat,i was told that would increase the postage charge by 50p,I refused retreaved the letter,put it on the counter squashed it into a folded state then gave it back GUESS WHAT it went through the price was now back to letter post, if thats not one of the biggest cons out i don"t know what is!! if they keep increasing their charges they will just price themselves out of the market, & bankruptcy here we come !!, I & no doubt many other people now use EMails rather than the PO as its cheaper, quicker,& only use the parcel post for small items as anything bigger than a watch box is cheaper by courier,if the PO boss"s stopped bleeding the company dry with their excessive wages & bonus"s that might just help,but no matter what they WILL have to seriously look at the way they are running this farce of a company,& restructuring will be the only
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
06:02 PM on 03/02/2012
here we go again

another institution backing the law of diminishing returns

put the price up and customers will find a way of getting it or doing it cheaper elsewhere.

prices up customers down end result the provider of service gets to close as to keep going is unsustainable. The fear is that the once popular post office sevice is going to implode as prices go up and the service gets worse and the customers leave in droves.

what would management say then why "its not our fault"

many more businesses will come to the same end
04:31 PM on 03/02/2012
Ok, the economy is in the doldrums. Royal mail making a loss of £2 million a week - why? It doesn't take a MENSA member to wotk this out - people are not sending as much post these days because it's too costly. And why is this; because the Royal Mail have far too many pen-pushers and not enough posties. I remember (not too long ago) when there were 2 deliveries, both in the morning, so cheques (remember them?) could be got to the bank the same day they arrived - nowadays, post could arrive at any time; if this is what "progress" brings, take me back to the "old" days!!
02:46 AM on 03/03/2012
our post used to arrive at about 08.00 hrs with a second delivery around 12.00,now we are very lucky to get a single post by 15.00hrs,todays post arrived at 15.20 hrs,the reasons for such drastic loss"s are several,the boss"s wages & bonus"s being one, overstaffing of the pen pushing brigade being another,the cost of fuel for their vehicles,no doubt the vehicle insurance is astronomical,tyres & serviceing being another,this failing company will have to restructure pretty dammed quick or will face bankruptcy in the very near future & the only ones to suffer as usual will be the ground staff,as you can guess all the management will be well covered with severance payments & an OTT pension scheme.