Clare's Law Pilot Schemes To Be Announced By Theresa May

PA/The Huffington Post UK  |  By   |  Posted: 5/03/2012 07:23 Updated: 5/03/2012 10:05

Clares Law Theresa May
Home Secretary Theresa May is set to reveal that four areas in England and Wales will trial the changes.

The government is expected to announce "Clare's Law" pilot schemes that will give women the right to ask police about a partner's history on Monday.

Home Secretary Theresa May is set to reveal that four areas in England and Wales will trial the changes.

It follows a campaign for a change in the law to help protect women from domestic abuse by the Michael Brown, the father of a woman murdered by her partner.

Brown's daughter, Clare Wood, was strangled and set on fire by her ex-boyfriend, George Appleton, at her home in Salford in February 2009.


Clare Wood

Appleton, dubbed the "Facebook Fugitive" then went on the run before hanging himself.

On Monday morning Brown said that if his daughter had known about her partner's violent past she would have "dropped him like a hot brick and scampered out of there." He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that women deserved an opportunity to make an "educated decision."

However domestic violence charity Refuge warned the plans would be costly and may not help: "It is highly unlikely that she [Wood] was killed because the police didn't inform her about her ex-partner's violent history. It is more likely that she was killed because the police did not respond to her emergency 999 call for help," chief executive Sandra Horley told Today.

"We are at a loss to understand why the government is spending precious time and money - especially at a time of austerity - on this new scheme.

"As the law stands, the public already have the right to ask and the police have the powers to disclose information about a man's previous history."


George Appleton


Wood, 36, a mother-of-one, had met Appleton on Facebook, unaware of his horrific history of violence against women, including repeated harassment, threats and the kidnapping at knifepoint of one of his ex-girlfriends.

At the inquest into Wood's death last year, Coroner Jennifer Leeming said women in abusive relationships should have the right to know about the violent past of the men they were with.

"Sarah's Law" named after Sarah Payne who was murdered by paedophile Roy Whiting in 2000, now gives parents the right to know of any child sex convictions of men with access to their children.


Michael Brown, the father of Clare Wood


A Home Office spokesman said: "Domestic violence is a particularly dreadful form of abuse and we are constantly looking at ways to strengthen protection for victims.

"That is why we consulted on introducing a domestic violence disclosure scheme, often known as 'Clare's law'. We will be making a formal announcement shortly."

May last year agreed to open a 'Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme' to public consultation and is now considering the response.

Quick Poll

Do you think it's fair to allow people to ask police about their partner's history?

VOTE

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

The government is expected to announce "Clare's Law" pilot schemes that will give women the right to ask police about a partner's history on Monday. Home Secretary Theresa May is set to reveal that...
The government is expected to announce "Clare's Law" pilot schemes that will give women the right to ask police about a partner's history on Monday. Home Secretary Theresa May is set to reveal that...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:46 on 06/03/2012
This should be welcome with open arms and it is for both partner man and women. It should be details about both partners where everything must be in paper, ex partner, kids, care home and the way person being bought up so they know who they getting into so at later date no but if? Problem solved. All should have C. V. about their life just like job applicant have to disclose all and company know so same way one must know true back ground of someone you going to live with and going to have children with. We moving forward good sign society is awake now. Put private detective on the person you want to live with, it is lot cheaper than you think, it wast no time at later in life. We check goods before we buy, we try goods before we pay so why not in this case?
20:05 on 05/03/2012
All I would say to any lady that is hit just once, get out stay out and never go back, no excuse can justify abuse be it mental or physical,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Galician
Keep calm and carry on
17:46 on 05/03/2012
I am a woman, a lawyer and a pacifist and I don't believe in any positive discrimination. If it is a discrimination, there is no way of being positive.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dbsherri
Remember what the Dormouse said
15:58 on 05/03/2012
I live in the US and domestic violence (I HATE this term...sounds like the chairs are fighting) is everywhere... but I'm not sure this would help. As other people have commented, the police aren't very organized when it comes to this stuff (they didn't respond to her call for help for heaven's sake) and more importantly, if some whack job is out to get someone, they will do it; if it's about stalking, she can't just walk away, he'll keep coming back until she's dead.

Wish I knew the answer but I can tell you this much...sometimes alone is better
15:21 on 05/03/2012
As long as this is kept fair I agree with it, But it has to be kept fair, In other words the same for everyone woman and men, Domestic violence against a woman or anyone for that mater is a terrible thing and should be stamped out, And we all know that domestic violence against women is far far more widespread than domestic violence against men, But yes is does happen to men, And more than what people think, In fact I have a very good friend who gets hit by his wife when she loses her temper, But he is so soft and easy going he just puts up with it, I am not saying she hurts him badly but that is not the point nobody should have to put up with violence !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PJ Parker
DC is Wall St's Customer Service Department
13:30 on 05/03/2012
Clare Wood's story is tragic. Her father is trying to do something to help young women. It will be interesting to see how this works out.

I don't believe this will work though. When you're young and in love, warnings fall on deaf ears. It starts with a harsh word, then a shove, and she thinks they've talked it out and it won't happen again.

There are women who want to date felons, too. They believe these guys have changed, turned their lives around, and need a chance. Some do.

On the other hand, an unfair vindictive remark on a man's record could ruin him.
13:02 on 05/03/2012
Are men going to have the same right?
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
14:16 on 05/03/2012
That, of course, is the $64000 question!

I would love to have known that some of the women I've gone out with were total whack jobs!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Harrold
Huzzah!
14:48 on 05/03/2012
I would ask exactly the same question - we all deserve to know if our partners to be have a history of domestic violence, no matter our sex.
19:22 on 05/03/2012
According to British newspapers, the process will also be open to men. It comes with a number of restrictions though. The police can reject an application for information if they feel it is unnecessary and will not respond to information requests from families regarding the character/record of a partner that they feel is unsuitable for their son or daughter.
lastpost
see biography
13:01 on 05/03/2012
"We are at a loss to understand why the government is spending precious time and money - especially at a time of austerity - on this new scheme."
Darling. I’m finding myself a little uneasy when I’m around you. I see in the paper here, that there’s a new service just started. Couples can submit a list of ten questions they’d like to ask their partner. Then if they both agree. Simply turn up, and for a nominal sum subject themselves to a love-detector test. Well! What do you say?
Fine Sweetheart. As long as one of the questions isn't, what's going to become of policing when any Tom, John or Sherlock's allowed to do it?
12:44 on 05/03/2012
It's supposed to be equal rights so much for equality and all that. If women can know a man's past men should have the same right to know a woman's past
12:42 on 05/03/2012
A very sexist law, men should also be given the right to ask about a female partner's past that's only fair.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:12 on 05/03/2012
Another superficial bureaucratic gimmick that'll create a false sense of security, just like the sex offender's register.

A person having a criminal record is a very poor indicator of risk. Law isn't a good tool to combat this problem of violence, domestic and otherwise. Our culture has a very permissive attitude towards violent offenders who are a more dangerous category of offender than sex offenders, but do not receive half the stigma. Our culture needs to change.

If Clare Wood was George Appleton's first victim then such a check would have been useless. People with convictions like George Appleton generally do not go around burning their partner's daughter to death. If there were such a significant pattern, then fair enough. But there isn't.

Basing an 'informed choice' on preconceptions created by chronically angry cliques is dangerous. So trying to create the belief that convictions are a good guide is very irresponsible of Theresa May, but then, that's what is to be expected from a community of politicians dependant on demagoguery for their income.

If someone is so dangerous that we need to know their official criminal background, if they have one, then they should be in prison anyway. That's the whole point of having prisons in the first place.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lord Justice Wolf
12:58 on 05/03/2012
Precisely, if a person has not been rehabilitated to a degree that he can be safely released back into the community then the prison system and the legal system have failed us all? If a person is on his first offence and has never shown any signs of violence before then one must look at both sides in great detail. We know women cry wolf usually because there just plain evil or because they were slighted before by a previous relationship. But if the Police are accurate about there statement were they say "they new he posed a threat" then he should have been detained. They have a duty of care to the community to remove a threat and detain until he no longer poses a threat. The Police are responsible for failing there duty of care which is established by deciding whether there was a forceable chance he would commit a similar offence when released from Prison. If there is and they do nothing and the offender commits an offence, they have failed in there duty of care?
10:51 on 05/03/2012
its all good as long as men can ask about women too
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lord Justice Wolf
12:47 on 05/03/2012
Why? Do you find it sits better if you play tit-for-tat? As Wooie says you will have people doing it just for a laugh or in spite? Thinking on the tit-for-tat basis this appears to be you? This is about the misuse of information and the right to privacy. Don't forget we are about to privatise the Police force, so in essence information will be shared with anyone. Incorrect information will be listed against a person. I know of an incident were a person was shot dead by armed Police because intelligence showed the deceased had been convicted of carrying firearms so Police shouted and then fired. This person had never carried a firearm. He when 12 years of age admitted to purchasing with his pocket money an air gun from a shop. His father had took the air gun back but the then boy had the receipt in his pocket when at a later date he was stopped by police who asked him about the receipt. He told them and they charged him with possession of a firearm at now 13 years old. 30 years later on his record it just says possession of firearm, with no other details. An officer looking at that just see's the basics not the mitigation circumstances of an offence. Be careful what you wish for.
13:30 on 05/03/2012
Erm.. No.. Women also carry out acts of domestic violence by the way!
And what is to stop women using this as a means of doing it out of spite?

Oh silly me, I forgot that women are made of "Sugar and spice and everything nice"...
15:53 on 05/03/2012
personally i dont think you should give your details to the police, your not legally required to say anything to them. so if you have a record, its probably your own fault. yes it will be abused but then so will the sex offenders register but i dont hear anyone getting up in arms about that
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allyb999
10:30 on 05/03/2012
Don't know this just does not sound right, I find the idea just makes me uneasy.
10:20 on 05/03/2012
Surely if a woman needs to question a mans background then she shouldn`t been with him in the first place. This is going to go VERY VERY WRONG, you will have people doing " checks " out of spite and to get their own back on people or worse still just for a laugh !!!!! Then you will have INNOCENT men with a " flag " or something similar against their name. The simple fact is, there are too many people with the " there`s no smoke without fire " attitude ! I`m sure any checks that are done " WILL " be kept on record " just in case. This needs looking at VERY VERY carefully !!!!!!!!!!!
10:34 on 05/03/2012
And before all " P C " brigade start i accept i should have used to term " partner " but i didn`t because the majority of any checks done will be against men !
10:16 on 05/03/2012
Clares Law could have saved my family from an abusive violent man who worked his way into my life by marrying a family member, he was very well known to the authorities and there were concernes about his intentions towards my child, which I have found in writing! did they tell me? MAPA agreed they most certainly should have under the safeguarding children policies, still did they tell me?, the answere is NO because they didnt want to breach HIS human rights, we knew nothing and were told nothing of his seriouse violent past towards women and children. Under the current Law there is no protection for families like my self and in my case no-one will enfoce it! I have a right to know so Ican protect my family.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lord Justice Wolf
12:36 on 05/03/2012
MMm interesting, however in practise would your Daughter have listened to you? You find out that a guy has a history and you tell your daughter who is besotted by the guy? Would she just say oh okay Dad I will finish with him tonight? How many fathers or mothers have disliked the boyfriend of your childs? How many? Personally I haven't liked any of them and have told my daughter so but did she run and finish with him? No she didn't. How many fathers would use non existent information to warn a child just because he didn't like a boyfriend. We would all like to turn the clocks back on situations and wish we had dealt with them differently but as we are told, we all have to learn. Teenagers have to be let go and learn by there mistakes. Maybe we could educate them about abusive relationships. Maybe had your child been educated that she didn't have to suffer in silence or put up with an abusive relationship perhaps she would have come to you earlier.
13:06 on 05/03/2012
I think you have got the wrong end of the stick completley. it wasnt her boyfriend!.this is the usual asumption people make............ it was her STEP-GRANDAD and it was the both us that he terorised and manipulated.
In reply to your daughter scenario, well in the case of someone in authority coming to me as a mother and also talking with my family unit that if this was the case then she had atleast been told the truth, in our case we had documentary evidence that was not disclosed. This is in breach of universal safe guarding policies considering she was only 12yrs old at this time. So I have no idea where you have this idea that it was a boyfriend. she was still a child! WE should have been told he had commited horendouse offences towards women and children then I could have protected my family and my mother a 50 year old woman would not have married him.
14:03 on 05/03/2012
I believe it is paramount that teenagers are educated so that they know that any kind of abusewhether its psychological, social, physical, sexual or emotional is not acceptable in any kind of relationship.