Russian Election 'Clearly Skewed' Toward Putin, Claim International Observers

Vlad Putin Osce Election Russia

Huffington Post UK   Dina Rickman First Posted: 5/03/2012 10:27 Updated: 5/03/2012 12:22

The Russian election was "clearly skewed" in favour of Vladimir Putin, according to the independent Organisation for Security and Co-operation.

Tonino Picula, the special co-ordinator to lead the short-term observer mission said there were "serious problems" and "irregularities" in the election.

The Organisation for Security and Co-operation (OSCE) is one of the world’s largest regional security organisation with 56 states from across the globe as members.

Picula said: "There were serious problems from the very start of this election. The point of elections is that the outcome should be uncertain. This was not the case in Russia. There was no real competition and abuse of government resources ensured that the ultimate winner of the election was never in doubt."

In a statement the OSCE said Putin had a "clear advantage" over his competitors in terms of media presence.

Heidi Tagliavini, the head of the election observation mission of the OSCE Office for democratic institutions said candidates were unable to compete "on an equal footing."

The conference comes amid widespread allegations of fraud following Putin's victory in the Russian presidential elections on Sunday night.

According to Tiny Kox, the head of the delegation of Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly, voter's choice was "limited."

Opposition figures said they were preparing huge demonstrations against the result in Moscow on Monday.

With 99% of ballots counted the United Russia leader won with almost 64% of the vote, election officials said.

"I promised you we would win, and we won," Putin shouted to a flag-waving crowd of thousands of supporters outside the Kremlin on Sunday night, after claiming victory with just a quarter of votes counted.

Julia Pettengill, a research fellow at the Henry Jackson society said opposition could force Putin to leave office before his term ends in 2018.

"The opposition movement represents the greatest challenge to Putin's legitimacy since he came to power in 2000. Putin faces a broad-based, non-ideological protest movement which has gained strength in successive protests to become the most significant anti-government movement since the collapse of the Soviet Union.

"The Russian public no longer enjoy the levels of economic growth which once made the bargain of the Kremlin's so-called 'sovereign democracy'-restricted political liberties exchanged for economic prosperity-tolerable. (GDP growth is expected to diminish to 3.5% in 2012)."

Downing Street has said prime minister David Cameron is to call Vladimir Putin later on Monday but would not be drawn on whether he would congratulate the president on his election victory.

"It is clear that the election has delivered a decisive result," the prime minister's spokesperson said on Monday.

"Even the NGO polling data put Putin above the 50% needed to win in the first round. It is right that these assessments have taken place. They have clearly identified some problems. We would like to see these issues addressed over time."

Shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander MP said there were "real questions" about the election. “The Russian authorities should be in no doubt that the world will be watching their actions closely in the coming hours and days.”

1  of  19
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who claimed victory in Russia's presidential election, tears up as he reacts at a massive rally of his supporters at Manezh square outside Kremlin, in Moscow, Sunday, March 4, 2012. Vladimir Putin has claimed victory in Russia's presidential election, which the opposition and independent observers say has been marred by widespread violations. Putin made the claim at a rally of tens of thousands of his supporters just outside the Kremlin, thanking his supporters for helping foil foreign plots aimed to weaken the country. (AP Photo/Ivan Sekretarev)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

The Russian election was "clearly skewed" in favour of Vladimir Putin, according to the independent Organisation for Security and Co-operation. Tonino Picula, the special co-ordinator to lead the s...
The Russian election was "clearly skewed" in favour of Vladimir Putin, according to the independent Organisation for Security and Co-operation. Tonino Picula, the special co-ordinator to lead the s...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 35
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:11 AM on 03/10/2012
"There were serious problems from the very start of this election. The point of elections is that the outcome should be uncertain. This was not the case in Russia. There was no real competition and abuse of government resources ensured that the ultimate winner of the election was never in doubt."

Just like American elections then :)
07:19 PM on 03/05/2012
Putin Won, One Putin.

Putin 1 People 0
07:12 PM on 03/05/2012
He may be the best candidate but those Croc tears are too much to find credible.
06:42 PM on 03/05/2012
People!!! Money buys power, in the so called free world or in Russia, Skewed?Screwed? Whateverrrrrrr
photo
zenchris
Currently in Exile
06:24 PM on 03/05/2012
He was calling the shots all along anyway, now it's official, big deal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mokgee
Sabu.Satsang, Samsara, Solitude...
06:06 PM on 03/05/2012
Nothing new to report there then. same old, same old/ Now tell me this, what is the difference between Russia,and Britain, the answer, absolutely nothing. The predicatable 3, will put down anyone who attempts to oppose them, and they have. Britain was a democracy, now in name only. Russia was always a Communist country, which has gone through a multitude of changes, to end up exactly as it was..Therefore what is new in the people world,,,Absolutely nothing, that's what....
05:12 PM on 03/05/2012
I respect Putin (it does not mean I like him). He is a strong man. 12 years in power (and in Russia!). Would you be wanting to do it? I would not.
It is stupid to expect Russia to build a Western style democracy in a 20-year time... All who think it is possible either have not studied history or populists seeking to attract (or distract) public attention. Someone has to do the job Putin have done.
But I think now Putin has to change (or quit!). Russia does not need an economy based on fear and resentment. I hate to think that across the world Russia is still being portrayed as a hostile state - the state hostile to "Western" civilization values.
The responsibility for Putin's victory (and the rhetoric of hostility) is partially with you - the Western world that has not came out of the "cold war" habit of portraying Russia as a hostile state.
Russia has changed and the mass protest movement for honest elections is the evidence of that change. It is time for you to change.
06:06 PM on 03/05/2012
Mikhail Gorbachev appeared to be much more moderate than Putin - I say "appeared" because I hope I will be corrected if I am wrong here...

Putin's background was head of the FSB which in itself would probably mean that he leans towards being ruthless.

To blame the West for the election of Putin is in some some sense justified - as in the modern world where we are very much interconnected.
You could say that India is as much to blame as it buys armaments from Russia and hence supports Russia.

I believe the West really had moved away from the cold war however with the Chechen wars the relationship with Russia does seem to have been soured - was this the responsibility of the West too?
Who Knows...
09:47 PM on 03/05/2012
Thank you for you reply.
I wrote what I wrote because I am frustrated with what happens in Russia. I am not a Putin's supporter.
I also know that Putin was and is (still) branded as a dictator by the West.
You are not allowed to have a different opinion here (at least two years ago you were not allowed to think of Putin as something else). Even in academia, there seems to be no alternative to this view. As an LSE student two years ago, I was penalized by one of my professors for presenting a different few of Putin, his place in Russia's history and the trajectory of Russia's development.
Gorbachev is not better than Putin for me. He is weaker. Russians blame him for not being able to stand up for Russia when he had too. I do not think he is cleaner than Putin. In the Soviet times, to become something like Gorbachev you had to be part of the system (komsomol,KGB etc). You had to play by the rules.
Chechnya has been problematic for Russia since very long ago. It is a pawn in a big political game. The war has been deeply misunderstood and misrepresented by the West. Public opinion in the West was manipulated (although it is manipulated everywhere). The war itself was essentially violence of the state against its people. It was wrong. It was caused by Russian leaders' ignorance about their country's history...
10:04 PM on 03/05/2012
Thanks for the response - it is always important to hear other views and as you say things are so much more complicated than the presentation we get through the Western press.
Point taken about Gorbachev and how to get where he got to he could not have been a saint...

Regarding Putin being branded as a dictator - I think we are very much under the rule of a dictatorship in the UK what with student fees, the NHS changes, a coalition that nobody elected... albeit a semi-benign dictatorship.
photo
Birdman 49
Living day by day
05:10 PM on 03/05/2012
What's the differance, the right all around the world has been steeling elections for a long time now. Look at the US.
04:16 PM on 03/05/2012
Over 60% vote for Putin and the election is deemed skewed ? We have a government in power with far less support in the UK , so our elections in the UK were more about us getting screwed not skewed , but at least the Russian majority has got what it voted for.
03:55 PM on 03/05/2012
" Money money money "
its what the world go,s around.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
viko
Aim high, allow for the wind, land on target.
03:49 PM on 03/05/2012
Can't be so bad he is not 41.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cynic123
03:44 PM on 03/05/2012
He should have formed a co-alition like us then our government would not be calling his election foul play.
photo
theawesomejamie
this comment was brought to you by reason.
03:24 PM on 03/05/2012
They aren't tears. His brain is sweating so much from thinking of reason to explain his victory that it's seeping out of his eyes.
02:56 PM on 03/05/2012
The right man for the right job
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ccraiglamont
Sometimes funny, other times...not!
02:30 PM on 03/05/2012
At least he has some cajones!