Mobile Phone Use During Pregnancy Could Cause ADHD In Children, Warn Experts

Pregnant Mobile Phone

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 16/03/2012 12:11 Updated: 16/03/2012 15:10

Expectant mums who use mobile phones could cause health issues such as ADHD and anxiety in their children, according to a new study.

However, the research has been slammed by British scientists.

The team at Yale University tested the effects of exposure to radiation from mobile phones on pregnant mice. But scientists from the University College London argued that the findings were unjustified and that mice and humans do not make comparable subjects.

The researchers found the radiation exposure affected the brain development of the newborn mice, potentially leading to increased activity, anxiety and impaired memory, concluding that this could have a negative effect on babies in womb.

The researchers measured the brain electrical activity of adult mice that were exposed to radiation as foetuses and conducted a series of tests to identify factors associated with ADHD, such as impairments in memory, hyperactivity, anxiety and fear.

The mice that had been exposed to the radiation were found to have increased anxiety and activity and reduced memory capacity.

However, the researchers pointed out the amount of radiation the unborn mice were exposed to was proportionally far higher than an unborn baby would get as the whole bodies of the mice were exposed while a pregnant woman would usually hold her phone a metre from uterus.

The findings, published in journal Scientific Reports, suggested a link between the rising number of ADHD cases and the use of mobile phones.

Senior author Professor Hugh Taylor said: "We have shown that behavioural problems in mice that resemble ADHD are caused by mobile phone exposure in the womb. 

"The rise in behavioural disorders in human children may be in part due to foetal cellular telephone irradiation exposure."

However, Eric Taylor, Emeritus Professor of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, argues that mice and humans do not make comparable subjects for such a study and that it is unlikely mobile phones are responsible for rising ADHD rates.

He said: "This paper does not show any link between radiofrequency exposure and ADHD.

"The rate of ADHD problems has been steady for more than 20 years, any increase is due to greater recognition, so mobile phones are an unlikely cause.

"Taking animal studies and extrapolating directly to humans requires much more care.

"The exposure of the animals was very great, and the researchers' tests of animal memory should not be directly equated to human attention; different species can react differently."

The study authors acknowledged that further testing would be necessary to establish safe exposure limits for human babies, writing in Scientific Reports:

"Further testing is warranted in humans and non-human primates to determine if the risks are similar and to establish safe exposure limits during pregnancy."

Professor Malcolm Sperrin, Director of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Royal Berkshire Hospital, said: "This paper presents work from a highly respected organisation and does bring additional insight into how electromagnetic radiation may affect tissue and its development during gestation.

"However, the authors repeatedly state that any correlation between the effects on mice during the study and predicted effects on humans are too tenuous to be reasonably claimed.

"Great caution must be given not to stretch the data too far until more work is done to move toward human equivalent studies," he said.

Pregnancy Health: Dos And Don'ts
1  of  11
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK LIFESTYLE

Expectant mums who use mobile phones could cause health issues such as ADHD and anxiety in their children, according to a new study. However, the research has been slammed by British scientists. ...
Expectant mums who use mobile phones could cause health issues such as ADHD and anxiety in their children, according to a new study. However, the research has been slammed by British scientists. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:11 AM on 03/20/2012
Any solution for It.
09:05 AM on 03/20/2012
I used an Anti-EM Belt from a brand called Morph Maternity when I was pregnant
photo
jf12
When I saw her I marveled greatly.
02:22 PM on 03/19/2012
In other news, scientists have discovered the average distance of a cell phone from a woman's body is only half of a meter, when she is specifically instructed to hold it away from her.
09:43 AM on 03/17/2012
I think the only way to settle this is to put the minister for telecommunications only child into a microwave after all its only a bigger transmitter !
09:37 AM on 03/17/2012
To people who dont believe radiation is harmful =a man got a job as a site manager he told his employer that mobile phones gave him headaches so he could not use one ,on site he felt unwell and the reason for that was a man on the other side of a wall was on a mobile phone !

Also a TV presenter had her mobile phone memory wiped out standing on a dock when a ferry came in with its radar on same went for the st nav !
09:29 AM on 03/17/2012
you are at even more risk if you live or work near a police radio ariel transmitter as it uses a powerful carrier wave designed for use in vast deserts or open sea applications it has no place in populated areas ,and a lot of police personal have left the service over this .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drg40
Representative Democracy is all we have.
06:56 AM on 03/17/2012
"Radiation is never good."! The contributor who made that remark should buy himself a relatively inexpensive radiation monitor and have a deal of fun frightening himself silly. There are large swathes of Britain which will be denied him; he will avoid other members of the human race, particularly girls, like the pox and he will fast find that mobile phones, in use or not, are well down his list of worries. In short it is witless comments like that which bring a reasonable debate into disrepute.

Could it be that women who use mobile phones to avoid immediate social contact with the rest of humanity and withdraw behind a technological shell are more likely to have babies who exhibit some symptoms of various ppsychological disorders after birth?
04:49 AM on 03/17/2012
I would say -because human brains are much more complex-the effects of cell phone on humans embryos is significant.
04:05 AM on 03/17/2012
To all those foolish enough to believe that electromagnetic radiation is harmless, try this on for size...

http://www.cellphone-health.com/cellphonedangers.htm
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
07:33 PM on 03/16/2012
"However, the research has been slammed by British scientists".
So the research is faulty- The naughty syndrome (ADHD) is also research that has been slammed by British and other scientists.
The only mental health problem that hasn't really been addressed is the paranoia about radiation and scientific principles that people do not understand.
Call me if you have a problem with that!
04:18 PM on 03/16/2012
'The rise in behavioural disorders in human children may be in part due to foetal cellular telephone irradiation exposure.' It may also be due to misdiagnosis, and the ridiculous guidelines in the DSM.
03:49 PM on 03/16/2012
Who holds their phone a meter away from your body?
photo
gimmeanamethen
saying it like it is
05:33 PM on 03/16/2012
stacey solomon does... well only if she has a ciggy in her hand at the sametime lol
03:40 PM on 03/16/2012
Cell phone use radiation. Radiation causes cancer. That radiation is pointed right at your head. Figure it out.
03:50 PM on 03/16/2012
Radiation does refer to many different forms of energy. Atomic radiation certainly causes cancer, but mobile phones emit electro-magnetic radiation, it's cancer causing properties are unknown but unlikely to be significant as we are all exposed to this kind of radiation in massive doses all the time, notably from the sun.
04:01 PM on 03/16/2012
Nice apologist tone. Radiation is never good. And saying that the effects of this radiation are "unknown" is disingenuous. Companies pay a lot of money to make sure the effects are unknow."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gumpo
06:59 PM on 03/16/2012
Liam, as you say "cancer causing properties unknown" and thats the trouble, the "Authorities" will always use the line that theres "no proven link" because it sounds alot better than " we don't really know yet" but when you look at the evidence it's also easy to say the cancers have to come from somewhere, and brain/ neck cancers have increased hugely in the last 10 years !
And remember we used to line our houses with asbestos, smoking was really popular and was "safe" in the 50s.
I expect the truth is there somewhere, but until you look in the right place it's easy to ignore its existance !!