David Cameron Publishes Details Of Private Dinners With Tory Donors

Posted: 26/03/2012 12:13 Updated: 26/03/2012 17:09

David Cameron
The prime minister has denounced the actions of the Conservative party treasurer

David Cameron has published details of dinners in Downing Street in which donors who gave more than £50,000 to the Tory party were present.

The decision is a swift U-turn on a previous insistence that the meetings were a private matter for the prime minister and his family.

The move comes one day after the Conservative Party co-treasurer Peter Cruddas resigned after being filmed by The Sunday Times apparently offering access to the prime minister, and crucially influence over policy, in return for donations of £250,000 a year.

Speaking in London on Monday afternoon, Cameron said in future the party would publish quarterly details of any meal attended by a Tory donor.

He said that since the election there had been three dinners in his Downing Street flat in which "significant donors" had been in attendance.

On February 28, 2011, the prime minister ate with millionaire donor David Rowland and his wife, along with the co-chairman of the Conservative Party, Andrew Feldman.

On November 2, 2011 there was a dinner with Henry Angest, the chairman and chief executive of the Arbuthnot Banking Group. City trader Michael Farmer and his wife were present as was Ian Taylor, the president of the oil trader Vito.

And on February 27, 2012, Cameron had a meal in his Downing Street flat with Michael Spencer, a Tory party donor and former party treasurer, and his partner.

The prime minister also said there had been an additional post-election dinner in which included donors to the party.

The meal, held on July 14, 2010, was inside No.10 Downing Street as the prime minister's private flat was being refurbished.

"None of these dinners were fund raising dinners and none of these were paid for by the taxpayer," he said.

The donors in attendance at the meal were: Anthony Bamford from JCB, hedge fund manager Michael Hintze, Tory peer Lord John Sainsbury, Andrew Feldman, Lansdowne Partners chief executive Paul Ruddock, Mike Farmer and city financier Michael Freeman.

Telegraph Media Group chief executive Murdoch Maclennan also attended the meal although is not believed to be a donor.

There will be a "full party inquiry" into how the Conservatives raise money to fund their campaigns led by Tory peer Lord Gold.

Cruddas urged reporters from The Sunday Times, posing as wealth fund executives, to give more than £250,000 in return for direct face time with senior ministers.

He claimed those making such donors, classed as "premier league" could raise issues with ministers and feed their concerns into a Downing Street "policy committee".

Cruddas resigned within hours of his claims being exposed by newspaper and denied that party donors could in fact improperly influence ministers.

The matter has been reported to the police.

Labour leader Ed Miliband is not satisfied with an internal Tory party review and has demanded a independent inquiry.

He told the Commons on Monday afternoon that "inquiry into the Conservative Party, by the Conservative Party, for the Conservative Party" was not good enough.

"This scandal speaks to the conduct and character of the prime minister and government, anything short of an independent inquiry will leave stain on this government and this prime minister," he said.

Miliband also accused Cameron of being "too ashamed" to come to the Commons himself to face MPs over the row and sending Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude instead.

Following Cruddas' resignation Cameron insisted that was "not the way" the Conservative Party raised money.

"It's quite right that Peter Cruddas has resigned. I will make sure there is a proper party inquiry to make sure this can't happen again," he said.

CASH FOR ACCESS - FULL COVERAGE

  • Full Text - Cruddas' Resignation Statement
  • Profile - Who is Peter Cruddas?
  • Analysis - Has 'The Next Big Scandal" Broken?
  • Rupert Murdoch: 'No One Will Believe Cameron'
  • Party Donor Row To Overshadow Politics For Months
  • The row led to renewed calls for reform of party funding. Sleaze watchdog Sir Christopher Kelly warned that the incident could not be seen as "an isolated event" and urged the parties to come through on their commitments to the "big donor culture".

    Sir Christopher, chairman of the independent Committee on Standards in Public Life, said politicians should not be allowed to "duck" the issue of party funding any longer.

    "It would be wrong to regard this as an isolated event. Events like it are inevitable as long as the main political parties are dependent for their existence on large donations from rich individuals or, in the case of the Labour Party, a small number of trade unions.

    "The parties collectively need urgently to address the damage this does to confidence in the integrity of the political process."

    Asked about funding reform, Cameron was non-committal, stressing that he had already addressed issues within the Conservative party.

    "We've reformed party funding. I took over a party with £20m of debt. It's now virtually debt-free," he said.

    "We've massively broadened our supporter base. We have very strict rules, very strict compliance, and I'm going to make sure that the rules are properly complied with in every case."

    But Danny Alexander, the chief secretary to the Treasury and second most powerful Lib Dem in the Government, said the three main parties would be making a renewed effort on funding reform within the next few weeks.

    "What I would say is this makes the case for reforming the system of party funding in this country even stronger.

    "No political party has been without its problems in relation to party funding. Over the next few weeks the three parties will be getting round the table following on from an initiative by Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister, to discuss how we can change the way party funding works to try and get the big money out of politics."

    In a statement released in the early hours of this morning, Mr Cruddas said he regretted "any impression of impropriety arising from my bluster".

    "Clearly there is no question of donors being able to influence policy or gain undue access to politicians," he said.

    "Specifically, it was categorically not the case that I could offer, or that David Cameron would consider, any access as a result of a donation."

    It has emerged that the matter has been reported to police.

    A Metropolitan Police spokesman said yesterday: "Today, Sunday, March 25, an allegation was made at Greenwich police station under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.

    "The allegation is currently being assessed. We are not prepared to discuss this any further."

    Click HERE for five other food-based scandals involving politicians.

    Also on HuffPost:

    Launch Slideshow
     HIDE THUMBNAILS
    1 of 14
    PLAY ALL
    VOTE ON THIS SLIDE

    ADVERTISEMENT
    FOLLOW UK POLITICS

    David Cameron has published details of dinners in Downing Street in which donors who gave more than £50,000 to the Tory party were present. The decision is a swift U-turn on a previous insistence ...
    David Cameron has published details of dinners in Downing Street in which donors who gave more than £50,000 to the Tory party were present. The decision is a swift U-turn on a previous insistence ...
    Filed by Ned Simons  | 
     
     
    • Comments
    • 193
    • Pending Comments
    • 0
    • View FAQ
    Post Comment Preview Comment
    To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
    View All
    Favorites
    Recency  | 
    Popularity
    Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
    17:20 on 27/03/2012
    let's face it he's only going to throw parties for the nodding dogs/yes men and his rich buddies he's promised big contracts to- he's unlikely to be inviting the people he's screwed-NHS workers,pensioners,students,the sick or the 'ordinary' working man.
    07:21 on 27/03/2012
    One wonders just how many private dinners Blair & Brown hosted for their supporters at No.10 whilst the Labour party were in power.
    09:04 on 27/03/2012
    Why, whats the difference.
    10:00 on 27/03/2012
    None, so why the noise about this sort of thing now?
    07:05 on 27/03/2012
    Perhaps if I was Mr "Tesco" and gave the Tory Party a donation of £100M, I could influence policy reguarding the number of days meat products can be kept on a the shelf before being removed on health grounds. Or I might wish to see a change in the way Planning Policy is conducted in areas opposed to large commercial developments. Are we to now assume that such policy is now all up for sale and than the democratic process has nothing to do with it !!.
    photo
    degsy
    some men are wise...and some are otherwise
    16:55 on 27/03/2012
    To: The truth is out there " Are we to now assume that such policy is now all up for sale and than the democratic process has nothing to do with it !!."

    Absolutely! Has been for a very long time!
    06:59 on 27/03/2012
    No.10 Downing Street is Public property, how can the PM be allowed to use this property for the purposes of gaining monetary support form finacial and bussiness leaders for his party. When it is aparent that these people will expect to affect the way policy is conducted at the top of our government ?...... Am I to assume that British Government Policy is no longer part of a Democracy, but rather somthing that can be bought and sold to the highest bidder ?.
    photo
    degsy
    some men are wise...and some are otherwise
    18:16 on 27/03/2012
    To: The truth is out there
    "Am I to assume that British Government Policy is no longer part of a Democracy, but rather somthing that can be bought and sold to the highest bidder ?"

    Yes!
    photo
    HUFFPOST SUPER USER
    vividrick
    I came, I saw...I had a cup of tea!
    02:43 on 27/03/2012
    Would make a bizaare, yet interesting episode of 'Come Dine With Me'.
    01:48 on 27/03/2012
    Different world, oh how I wish these people were like 'human beings'. A couple of weeks back Dave C talked of his close friendship with Charlie Brookes as he is a neighbour and only lives a few miles away.
    Now, I ask what of the many 10,000's that live within that 'few miles' are they all close friends too.
    My neighbours live next door or across the road.
    The truth is if Charlie Brookes was broke and not a multi-millionaire there would be no friendship, I't all about money!
    23:33 on 26/03/2012
    I'm not really across all this sort of stuff, however I take it that all money accumulated by political parties from donors is subject to taxation ? Also if I were to donate £250,000 to a political party to have dinner, would that be another form of tax relief or avoidance ? Please enlighten me.
    23:15 on 26/03/2012
    It's disgusting Dave, I agree with Labour - it's much better to sell knighthoods, lordships,honours etc., isn't it?

    Well until you get caught......
    23:12 on 26/03/2012
    £250,000 = direct face time
    Budget = 5p off the 50p tax rate
    Money well spent, I mean donated lol
    22:38 on 26/03/2012
    Does Mr Cameron honestly think that the general public beleive that those benifactors gave vast sums of money to his party just to dine with him without any thing in return,what does he take us for.
    23:01 on 26/03/2012
    Probably about as much as the general public believe that the Unions have their members best interests at heart....
    07:23 on 27/03/2012
    Oh so very true.
    23:16 on 26/03/2012
    Waiters and waitresses?
    22:27 on 26/03/2012
    does anyone want to have dinner at mine tomorrow? only £50.
    fredgladys
    Your Micro-bio is empty, I know, stop nagging.
    05:57 on 27/03/2012
    How many courses?
    This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
    22:20 on 26/03/2012
    try again:-)

    Asked about funding reform, Cameron was NON-COMMITAL, stressing that he had already addressed issues within the Conservative party......
    SO TELL THE NATION NOW...SO WE CAN TRUST YOUR OPEN GOVERNMENT PLEDGE

    We've reformed party funding. I took over a party with £20m of debt. It's now virtually debt-free," he said.,..
    .HOW DID YOU DO THAT? Hmmmm???? donations perhaps from 'special people'
    01:39 on 27/03/2012
    Reducing party debt by 20 million should be a piece of cake using these tactics.
    This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
    22:19 on 26/03/2012
    My last comment...didnt didnt show all I posted...try again:-)

    Asked about funding reform, Cameron was NON-COMMITAL, stressing that he had already addressed issues within the Conservative party.
    This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
    22:17 on 26/03/2012
    Asked about funding reform, Cameron was NON-COMMITAL, stressing that he had already addressed issues within the Conservative party.
    Southern law girl
    Researching my viewpoint....
    22:08 on 26/03/2012
    Something has to give, and give really soon. Another commentator spoke about becoming like America, no democracy, simply going to the highest bidder, or donor if you prefer. As a Country, we are supposed to be better than that, we should be setting a good example, it's not as though we don't know how it's done, after all Westminster is supposed to be the Mother of Parliaments. Although it may be bitter sweet, an amount of money should be made available to each of the political parties, but should be proportionate, even if it is State funded, we cannot have it both ways, but this would at least take away any element of sleaze. If however, the rules are broken, that should mean a serious breach and be dealt with accordingly. But the important thing to remember it has to be dealt with somehow or other.