'High Doses Of Sugar Is The Same As Poison' Warns Doctor Robert Lustig

The Huffington Post UK  |  By Posted: 3/04/2012 12:42 Updated: 3/04/2012 12:42

Sugar Toxic

A (large) spoonful of sugar can prove fatal, a leading doctor in the US has warned, as it can have the same effect on the body as poison when eaten in large quantities.

A paediatric endocrinologist from the University of California claims that high doses of sugar, (whether it’s crystallised, in a corn syrup or granulated), turn into ‘toxins’, which lead to heart disease, obesity, high blood pressure and diet-related diseases like type-2 diabetes.

Motivated by his own patients and after treating too many sick and obese children, Dr Robert Lustig pinpoints sugar as the blame.

The doctor has become a pioneer in the war against sugar and believes that all types of the sweet stuff should be taken more seriously and be classed as a toxic health hazard.

Dr. Lustig is urging for sugar to be classed as lethal as tobacco and alcohol. Blaming sugar for the “public health crisis”, he told 60 Seconds:

“Ultimately this is a public health crisis. And when it’s a public health crisis, you have to do big things and you have to do them across the board. Tobacco and alcohol are perfect examples.

“We have made a conscious choice that we’re not going to get rid of them, but we are going to limit their consumption. I think sugar belongs in this exact same wastebasket.”

The key behind the warning is that it’s not just sugar that is poison – but the dose that makes it toxic, warns Dr. Lustig.

However, with food companies replacing fat with sugar, it’s becoming a problem that’s becoming increasingly difficult to avoid.

"When you take the fat out of food, it tastes like cardboard," explains Dr. Lustig. "And the food industry knew that, so they replaced it with sugar … and guess what? Heart disease, metabolic syndrome, diabetes and death are skyrocketing."

Although sugar consumption has decreased 40% since the 1970s, its replacement – corn syrup – in on the rise and is, as Dr. Lustig explains, “just as toxic” as they both contain fructose, the compound that gives food its sweet taste.

So how much added sugar should we be eating (or avoiding)?

According to the British Dietetic Association, the recommended intake of ‘added sugars’ – such as honey, fruit juice, jam, soft drinks and those in processed food, is around 50g a day.

However, when one can of Coca Cola (500ml) contains 65g of sugar – the equivalent of 13tsp of sugar and 15g over the sugar RDA - it’s easy to see how Brits are way off target when it comes to adequate sugar consumption.

If you want to know how much sugar is too much, avoid food that contain more than 15g of sugar per 100g and lean towards food that is 5g and under in every 100g.

How to avoid the sugar traps, according to Netdoctor:

  • Choose wholegrain over sugar cereals: Cereals or porridge instead of sugar-coated varieties.

  • Bin canned fruit juice: Swap canned fruit in syrup for those in juice and go for carbonated water with fruit juice added rather than sugary drinks.

  • Avoid fructose: Fructose (the sugar in fruit) doesn't cause the same rapid rise - and then drop - in blood sugar as sucrose (the sugar found in processed foods such as cakes). Natural fructose is absorbed slower. Fruit also provides plenty of vitamins, minerals and fibre.

  • Watch out for brown sugar: Brown sugar may contain slightly higher levels of a few minerals, such as potassium and magnesium, but otherwise it's just as short on protein and vitamins as the white stuff.

  • Read labels: Forms of sugar in processed foods are also called glucose, dextrose, fructose, invert syrup, corn syrup, raw, brown or demerara sugar, glucose syrup, lactose, maltose, hydrolysed starch or treacle.

Loading Slideshow...
  • Hidden Fat Traps Lurking In Your Food

  • Dried Fruits

    Dried fruits are a great tasting snack, but beware they are often sprayed with a sugar solution before being packaged.

  • Sushi

    Sushi can come packed with mayonnaise (or mayo based sauces) as well as other sauces full of hidden calories.

  • Fruit Smoothies

    Not all smoothies have potential fat traps - ones made entirely from wholefood ingredients and fresh fruit, are packed with nutrients and vitamins. However, don't be fooled into thinking that all smoothies make a healthy drink. Many processed smoothies are so full of added sugars, syrup, additives and full-fat milk (and sometimes ice cream), that you'd be better off having a large milkshake from your local takeaway.

  • Vegetable Crisps

    It may seem like the healthier alternative to a packet of salt and vinegar crisps, but veggie crisps have the same fat content as ordinary crisps.

  • Frozen Yoghurt

    Frozen yoghurt is usually low in calories - but the sugar content can be sky high.

  • Chicken Wraps

    A tortilla wrap may contain carbohydrate than a slice of bread, but most pre-packed wraps are packed full of hidden fat traps, such as processed meat, mayonnaise and butter.

  • Processed Cereal

    Many cereals contain a host of different sweeteners to make them more tasty, so make sure you check the sugar content before piling it into your breakfast bowl.

  • Low Fat Muffins

    Choosing a low-fat muffin over a full fut version may seem like a clever move, but in reality, the snack can contain more sugar. This means that not only could your 'healthier' muffin contain more calories, it may be less filling too.

  • Gluten-Free

    Gluten-free aren't necessarily more healthy. Many gluten-free foods are processed and packaged, meaning they still have the fat traps other foods have.

  • Rice Cakes

    Rice cakes can be a low calorie snack - as long as you stick to plain and don't pile on the toppings.


FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE

A (large) spoonful of sugar can prove fatal, a leading doctor in the US has warned, as it can have the same effect on the body as poison when eaten in large quantities. A paediatric endocrinologist...
A (large) spoonful of sugar can prove fatal, a leading doctor in the US has warned, as it can have the same effect on the body as poison when eaten in large quantities. A paediatric endocrinologist...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 150
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
09:05 AM on 05/01/2013
Hello, I am doing a school project on the effects of sugar and whether there should be a ban or restrictions put on it, i've posted a few questions but would just like to know your views!
Here they are:

1. There has been much talk about putting a ban on sugar as there is on smoking and drinking. Policies such as to curb sugar in schools, put taxes on soft drinks and have age restrictions. Do you think this should go ahead and what are your main views and opinions on the situation?

2. In the past 50 years sugar consumption has tripled worldwide and many people believe that this is the reason that 30% more people are obese, in the world, than malnourished. Are you inclined to agree with this or does it seem like an exaggerated fact used to scare the public?

3. If the government do decide to act against sugar as they have with alcohol and tobacco do you think health worldwide will increase? Or will the fight against the restrictions be larger than the aim of increasing the world’s health?

4. In your mind does sugar come under the same category as smoking in public places, having designated drivers, air bags in cars and condom dispensers in public bathrooms? (some of the previous informants from the government)
04:18 AM on 09/14/2012
God, it seems, designed human physiology in such a manner that it should first expend two units of energy to obtain three from the diversity of foods it can eat. Sugars being almost an/the end product of digestion and devoid of any intertwined nutrient impair the narrow-range-game of expenditure and income of energy and thus are toxic. .....Kudos to Dr. Lusting for waking mankind to abuse of sugars.
11:25 AM on 06/06/2012
Sugar kills all life, spreads cancers, destroys your teeth, and makes you obese. There should be a very high tax on sugar, higher than the tax on cigarettes.
12:40 PM on 06/05/2012
some people would not see a priest on a mountain of sugar
11:46 AM on 06/05/2012
This is hardly news !. I read a similar study back in the 1970's entitled "White Sugar, White Death !". Just another food fascist jumping on the faddist bandwagon methinks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGillLondonUK
UNDIVIDED UNCONQUERED
12:17 PM on 02/18/2013
No its true, look around, why do you think there are so many fat people?
09:57 AM on 06/05/2012
Once again we have scare mongerers telling us things we already know, yes sugar can be bad for you, so can drinking too much water, or anything in excess, a moderate amount of most things will not do as much harm as the thought of the entire human race living to be 200. I am a great believer in nature knows best, so lets stop our interference with it. We all have to die sometime and from something, whilst I'm not in favour of shortening lives, I am not in favour of living forever. Life is for living and enjoying it as much as possible, nor for finding more ways to ensure global over population, because ultimately that is what will see us all dying of starvation and desease. NUFF SAID!
07:28 PM on 04/09/2012
White flour has the same effect on your blood sugar as sugar. French bread may be 30% more glycemic than table sugar. It is the hidden sugar-like substances that you have to worry about - they are as toxic as sugar. You can learn more about blood sugar and what raises them very easily on the internet:

http://diabetesrisk.net/
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/20/sugar-dangers.aspx
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGillLondonUK
UNDIVIDED UNCONQUERED
12:18 PM on 02/18/2013
Yes, so does white flour
11:57 PM on 04/04/2012
I tried the zero sugar thing for weeks,I mean I had zero, and started to get sick.I got really skinny and experienced head-aches.I felt like something that needed to be there was missing so I got off that mad ride and back to my old ways and definately felt better physically and mentally.Be wearey of the extremists.
04:49 AM on 04/05/2012
Those were withdrawals. This is what turns people away from things like raw food diets and such. Your body isn't getting the so called "drug" (I know its not a "drug", but we will call it that for the sake of this post) so it does some pretty wierd stuff as it begins to right your system again. Btw, I quit all the drugs I was doing as a teenager cold-turkey (I dont suggest doing it that way) and some pretty WIERD stuff was happening to me for about six months. White-outs everytime I stood up from sitting down, light headed, cloudy mind, tingling, and a multitude of other very strange experiences. It definitely isn't fun to go through, but just know that its not your body saying it NEEDS what you've taken away(you definitely do not NEED refined sugar) treat it like your body is paying you back for being such an irresponsible decision maker. :)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:06 PM on 04/11/2012
Im trying the 0 sugar thing and its been a week. I am very angry at times . confiture , honey , coca cola and my favourite lucozade I have been avoiding them. Its so hard. I have to find a substitute , water tastes craptacular.
11:44 AM on 06/05/2012
I have a cure for you tim buck too. Settle down with a nice large box of Thornton's choccies. You will very soon feel better, and ready to take your place in normal, non faddist, Society again.
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
09:24 PM on 04/04/2012
And yet is was Dr. Albert B. Sabin of the University of Cincinnati who developed the vaccine for polio and decided the best way to administer it was with a sugar lump!

So cure us and kill us at the same time!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angela Little Miller
05:06 PM on 04/05/2012
Seriously? Too MUCH sugar over your life and in large amounts is bad for you. No one is claiming that a sugar cube will kill you. Do we have reading comprehension issues?
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
06:55 PM on 04/05/2012
No I have 'Irony' issues. Some comedy issues and an amazing tolerance for people who start a post with the word seriously. (And then state the bl88ding obvious)
06:22 PM on 04/04/2012
Couldn't possibly be the high amount of fats aswell in the American diet, that causes problems, could it? And don't forget their portions are HUGE!
I am 57 and grew up having fillings, I have always been skinny and we never had too much food when I was young. Nor did we have floss/interdental sticks etc. There are many things that are bad for you, if you eat too much of them. I like to bake cakes and pastries, and really enjoy my chocolate. I have no intention of changing.
All things in moderation. My husband worked in research and said it's maybe 30 years before you see the results of things. So let's wait a bit more to see the results of the trash-eating young, who don't eat home-cooked wholesome food any more because mums have to work, whose meals are out of a microwave, whose soft drinks are full of artificial sweeteners - aspartame being an example. And don't forget the phenyalanine, which is proven to cause fits, yet STILL gets put in soft drinks.
Basically, eat plenty of fresh fruit and veg which you can grow organically yourself and avoid the chemicals in store bought stuff. What you feed your kids now will from the basis of their adult constitution. You also need to treat yourself now and again, otherwise life is not worth living.
05:06 PM on 04/04/2012
This world alway has, is and always will be:
Full to the Brim of QUALIFIED Idiots and UNQUALIFIED geniuses!

The qualified IDIOTS' so called knowledge of today, was learned from
passed down knowledge and errors of the UNqualified geniuses of Yestercenturies!

I am 71 years old and like others of my age and even much OLDER than me,
after consuming loads of sugar (3 spoons in a tea or coffee) and chocolate,
sweets, jam, treacle, caramel, Mars bars, et all, am still very healthy and fit!

It is mainly to do with our constitution.
One man's meat is another man's poison!!
I could fall out of a tree and laugh! Another could fall out of a chair and die!

The MAIN proplem today, is processed foods with their chemicals.

I'll now retire to Bedlam
hmm.. I might meet a few qualified idiots in there.
Nudge, nudge, elbow, elbow, wink, wink!
04:16 PM on 04/04/2012
Sounds like the 'doctor' employed by unilever who wanted butter banned, and using the world toxins is like saying germs,no scienticfic meaning.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
virtusfides
04:02 PM on 04/04/2012
I am 72 years of age and have if we have to believe the doctors a constitution of an 50 year old. My whole life I am and still are a sweet neck, eat lots of sweets, two spoons of sucker in my coffee and tea, have always a bowl of sweets on the coffee table, and my favored are jam on bread or honey(sweetened). So if sucker was a poison I would have been death by poisoning a long time ago,or at least had heart of other health problems,but beside an accident problem I am healthy as a fish in water(clean water that is). So remove that article to the dust bin quick!
04:09 PM on 04/04/2012
Anecdote is not evidence.
03:17 PM on 04/04/2012
Government/politicians are far more toxic to our health than Sugar yet no one has talked about banning them! Other than me of course!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:16 PM on 04/04/2012
Quote: "Avoid fructose: Fructose (the sugar in fruit) doesn't cause the same rapid rise - and then drop - in blood sugar as sucrose (the sugar found in processed foods such as cakes). Natural fructose is absorbed slower. Fruit also provides plenty of vitamins, minerals and fibre"

"Bin canned fruit juice: Swap canned fruit in syrup for fruit in juice. Don't forget to "AVOID FRUCTOSE " though will you.....you know, that sugar stuff in fruit and go for carbonated water with fruit juice added rather than sugary drinks" BUT...Don't forget to "AVOID FRUCTOSE"

Bin canned fruit juice......Buy fruit in fruit juice......Buy water with fruit juice in it??? Don't forget to "AVOID FRUCTOSE " though will you?
Which is it then, should we avoid fructose or not? After all "Fruit also provides plenty of vitamins, minerals and fibre" but it's got fructose in it as well !!! AVOID FRUCTOSE !

Sort it out aol you're confusing your readers with statements like this, try reading the article before publishing it or sack the Netdoctor!

AVOID CONFUSION .........It's poisonous!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
virtusfides
04:03 PM on 04/04/2012
It's also rubbish!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:48 PM on 04/04/2012
Errr.........What is also rubbish?
07:09 AM on 04/06/2012
Hi, I noticed that too. There is a misquote that's causing confusion. The Netdoctor page (http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/dietandnutrition/toomuchsugar.htm) from which the text in the HuffPo article, and subsequently your post, were taken, does not contain the preface "Avoid fructose" in that paragraph. The Netdoctor page starts the paragraph with "Fructose (the sugar in fruit)..."

The words "Avoid fructose", whether they were added into the HuffPo article, or lifted "as is" from a now-correct Netdoctor page, should have said "Avoid sucrose". That should help everything fall into place for you, in the context of recommending fruit and fruit juices.

With that said, consider that the body doesn't differentiate between this and that sugar and the safest bet is to completely eliminate ALL sugar - cakes and sweets but also white and wheat bread, brown and white rice, wheat pasta, AND fruit - everything that converts to sugar. (Or nearly so, of course if you're running a marathon, you can't.) That's more in line with the British Dietetic Association's recommendation for sugar consumption than Ms. Hazell, who dismisses "the Brits" as "way off target" because there are 65g of sugars in soda. IMO, that's an example of the problem we all have, to frame the situation so that our consumption is the default, and our bodies' needs are secondary.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:59 AM on 04/06/2012
Hi, I realized it was a error by the writer of the article. Whilst I appreciate your input I was aware of the mistake and the netdocs intended direction hence my post, which for the unaware is misleading.
In your reply you say " the body doesn't differentiate between this and that sugar and the safest bet is to completely eliminate ALL sugar" However there is one difference between fructose and other sugars in that fructose is broken down and utilized by the body without the need for insulin and is an unavoidable part of a natural diet.
I believe that in the case of type 2 diabetes for instance it is the over consumption of those sugars requiring insulin to break them down in order to maintain acceptable blood sugar levels because the body recognizes that high levels are indeed poisonous, this also leads to weight gain, the situation eventually leads to insulin production capability being compromised due to the excessive strain put on the system by excessive sugar consumption, among the first indications of type 2......high blood sugar levels.