HMS Queen Elizabeth Carrier Hull Sections Joined In Govan Shipyard (PICTURES)

PA/The Huffington Post  |  Posted: 9/04/2012 13:05 Updated: 9/04/2012 13:14

The "largest and most powerful warship" ever built for the Royal Navy is beginning to take shape as two massive sections of HMS Queen Elizabeth were joined together today.

It took around 90 minutes to move a 4,087-tonne section of the hull of the aircraft carrier 328ft (100m) via 132 remote-controlled transporters to join another section of the ship at BAE Systems' Govan Shipyard in Glasgow.

Engineers will now spend the next week ensuring that the sections are perfectly aligned before welding them together into a 263ft (80m) long, 11,500-tonne section.

Project director Steven Carroll said today marked a "major milestone" in the construction.

He said: "It's the largest and most powerful warships we've ever built for the Royal Navy. They are 65,000 tonnes, so about three times the size of our present 'invincible' class and these ships will be the flagships for the nation for years to come.

"It's another chapter in a rich history of ship-building on the Clyde and it's a major engineering endeavour and one that we should be proud of as a nation that we can deliver major and complex programmes in the way that we are at the moment."

Carroll said up to 14,000 people are working on the project in terms of the construction, design and manufacturing and supply of materials.

The hull section in Glasgow, which will house two engine rooms, a medical area and accommodation, will now be fitted out before being transported to Rosyth in the autumn to join up with the other sections of the ship which have been constructed in Portsmouth.

The ship is due to be completed by 2016, with another aircraft carrier, HMS Prince of Wales, following later.

However due to MoD budget cuts it is possible HMS Queen Elizabeth will be sold to another country once HMS Prince of Wales is completed.

Upon coming to power the coalition decided that it could not fund the running costs of both ships, but that to cancel one or both would be even more expensive.

Labour has become increasingly critical of the government's handling of the carrier programme, with shadow defence secretary Jim Murphy warning a potential u-turn on their decision change the type of plane that will be flown from the ships.

“The carrier programme is one of Britain’s most strategically important defence projects and yet it is in disarray. More and more people will wonder whether this government can be trusted with the major projects on which our defences rely," he said.

RATE IT!   |  
VOTE
CURRENT TOP 5 PICK YOUR OWN TOP 5
USERS WHO VOTED
NEW! CREATE YOUR OWN SLIDESHOW
FOLLOW UK

The "largest and most powerful warship" ever built for the Royal Navy is beginning to take shape as two massive sections of HMS Queen Elizabeth were joined together today. It took around 90 minutes...
The "largest and most powerful warship" ever built for the Royal Navy is beginning to take shape as two massive sections of HMS Queen Elizabeth were joined together today. It took around 90 minutes...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 55
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:51 PM on 04/10/2012
may be the £45 million + interest that the args owe us from the Falklands war would go a long way towards keepin these two ships in the British Navy..cant belive their thinking of going down this road before both ships hav even been built it is shocking to say the least..
03:03 PM on 04/10/2012
However due to MoD budget cuts it is possible HMS Queen Elizabeth will be sold to another country once HMS Prince of Wales is completed.
Wate of time building it then in the first place.
02:30 PM on 04/10/2012
Hope I'm wrong but the best we might hope for from this white elephant is being a stand in for the Woolwich ferry if that breaks down! Even when built it needs the right aeroplanes. It needs the right and sufficient naval escort support. It also needs extensive, top quality defensive armament and radar among many other systems. Strong suggestions are that while parliament had to agree to the building there was no guarantee that they put anything more expensive inside her than a coffee machine. So we drift back to empty white hulk we darnt send out to sea, assuming of course we actually put engines into her! Our ancestors must turn in their graves to see what our country and its buffoon leadership has become.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norman Mitchison
01:31 PM on 04/10/2012
Have to start saving now to put planes on it.
03:04 PM on 04/10/2012
They rekon $300 million now per plane. What a way to save money
11:19 AM on 04/10/2012
What people seem to overlook is that a carrier is only the beginning. In order for it to be protected it needs to deploy with a group of ships. The best example is the US Navy's carrier strike group (CSG). This will include at a minimum a couple each of guided missile destroyers, guided missile cruisers, an attack submarine, and range of aircraft including AWACS, submarine hunter/killers, a variety of helicopters and of course fighter/attack planes. Unless we spend the money to deploy such a force, our carrier is a sitting duck.

The fighting capability of a CSG is crucial, but the goodwill missions are equally important and must not be forgotten. Again, the US Navy rushed to the aid of Japan following the tsunami with 23 ships, 15,000 sailors, 2,000 Marines and construction crews. This assistance was vital in building Japanese/American relations.
09:56 AM on 04/10/2012
They forgot the holes for the oars. With this shower of incompetent schoolboys in charge we won't be able to afford engines!
09:39 AM on 04/10/2012
And will it be ready in time for the next Argie war only to proudly sail into the war zone and be sunk.
This comment has been removed.
This comment has been removed.
02:25 AM on 04/10/2012
They better not sell either of these ships, to do so would be an abomination of an insult to the Royal Navy, to our countries naval heritage and traditions. I am so tired of their disrespect to our lads and lasses in the armed forces. Build these ships and keep them, and use them i agree that they will and would do great justice to the shipbuilding skills of our people and also bring in business when they sail the seas in our name and in our causes such as defending our country and our people and interests. KEEP THESE SHIPS!!!
07:30 AM on 04/10/2012
Sadly, any ship is old and clapped out once it's been in service for 20 years. Sure, you can keep them going but generally, the cost of doing that outweighs its usefulness. I make that comment from the experience of having 40 years of sea service beind me and I'm clapped out as well. As far as warships go, if you wish to win in any war situation, you have to stay ahead of any enemy you are called on to fight when it comes to the technology on board. Don't weep over lost ships, their value is always carefully considered, either in the case of war ships or merchant ships, before they're scrapped or sold. You also have to ask, why did the government choose this time to scrap the last aircraft carriers.............well, we are currently not under threat from any major seafaring nations so the time is right. If there is any threat at all, it's already coming from some of those living amongst us and we don't need an aircraft carrier for that.
07:54 AM on 04/10/2012
You obviously have seafaring experience and know what you are talking about. As for your final comment I entirely agree with you.
10:41 AM on 04/10/2012
How I agree with this comment! Don't sell them, keep them as a tribute to our British shipbuilders, as well as to our armed forces.

Victorbush1
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilEssex
Statistically, 6 out of 7 dwarves are not happy.
11:00 PM on 04/09/2012
What a joke ''most poweful warship''?, we haven't any planes to put on it, this has to be a late April fool joke.
01:00 AM on 04/10/2012
It comes with the new jets...the new, advanced stealth fighter jets....
They are there...trust me!

Remember that plane that Wonder Woman had? Well, technology has caught up to fiction!
07:32 AM on 04/10/2012
I agreee with you, to win in any war, we have to stay ahead of any enemy we are called on to fight.
08:07 PM on 04/09/2012
I would imagine with a bit of foresight these ships could actually earn this country a lot of business as surely they are a massive selling feature when sailing around the globe. Seems sad that all major countries invest in there Navies as there ships are used as ambassadors in most ports. Sad that as a small island in the world we rose to be a superpower on the back of the Royal Navy which was probably the first nationalised industry. These ships though costly should in my opinion be viewed as an investment for long term not to help solve a debt problem created by dishonest MP'S and there banker friends.
07:44 AM on 04/10/2012
I hate to say this but the UK doesn't build the best ships any more. The skills are no longer in the country and there are no yards to train the youth. Lack of investment by the companies and resistance to change from the shipyard workers unions eventually destroyed the industry, just as foreign yard competition started to tell us how to do it. It wasn't just the shipyards that suffered when they closed down but also the thousands of other companies that provided the items required to fit them out. We are lead to believe that Britannia still rules the waves but another sad fact is that Britannia doesn't, America does. In my 40 years at sea, I could count on the fingers of one hand the number of times I saw the British navy, either in a foreign port or at sea, however, the US navy are everywhere and we should thank God they are our allies.
07:57 PM on 04/09/2012
the government didn't need to scrap our aircraft carriers or sell the harrier jump jets
alls they had to do was retain them in portsmouth until they could afford to fuel the carriers to travel in emergency to any part of the world.
as for the new carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth that should be retained in Portsmouth
and when the HMS Prince of Wales carrier is built that should be retained and the Queen Elizabeth sent to the Falklands as a troop ,hospital ,cafeterria for visiting guests until aircraft are built for her.
No new ships should be sold on until they have served the UK for 40 years
wether they are active in war or peace.
The government should not need to reduce the money spent by the MOD but a
different way of ordering equipment should be made by Admiral of the Fleets,
AirVice Marshalls ,or Field Marshalls.and those who understand the forces need.
Those employed in the MOD -Civilians should be sacked. waisting money on what they
think the forces need is not what the forces require.
These people know exactly what they want and how big ,small, any fitments needed

modifiying and
08:29 PM on 04/09/2012
Retained and sent to the Falklands as a cafe... Are you off your head?
07:59 AM on 04/10/2012
Bet the coffee costs as much as one at Cafe Nero!!
07:50 AM on 04/10/2012
Forty years old.....where did you get that figure from. By keeping them that long, you are putting those on board in mortal danger, either from an enemy or from the sea itself. To the untrained eye, a ship that old still looks good but deep down it's clapped out. Would you keep a car on the road that long and a car doesn't have to run on highly corrosive sea water?
07:42 PM on 04/09/2012
Spent six years in the US Marine Corps and did many deployments on these super- ships. Ours had a full gym, basketball court, post office, library, a store... EVERYTHING!
Essentially, they're floating villages.

It'd be cool to see the inside of a Brit super ship. Will it have a chippy? A kebab shop? LOL!

And no, our American ones didn't have McDonalds or KFC. (Not that we didn't petition for it...)
10:37 PM on 04/09/2012
WHAT. We have not even got any planes to put on them!
06:41 PM on 04/09/2012
we should have a defence lottery