Dental X-Rays Linked To Brain Tumour Risk, Study Finds

Posted: 10/04/2012 10:44 Updated: 10/04/2012 10:44   PA

Dental Xray Brain Tumour

Frequent dental X-rays may significantly increase the risk of non-malignant brain tumours, say researchers.

Over a lifetime, having dental X-rays can double or triple the chances of developing meningioma tumours, a study has found. The tumours grow in the outer membrane covering the brain.

In one case, involving X-rays on children, a five-fold increase in risk was seen.

However, the likelihood of developing a brain tumour at all is very small. Meningiomas, which account for about one in five primary brain tumours, affect two or three in every 100,000 people in the UK each year.

The tumours are slow growing, often causing no symptoms, and usually benign.

Scientists in the US looked at the self-reported dental histories of 1,433 patients diagnosed with meningioma tumours. They were compared with a "control group" of 1,350 matched individuals who were free of the disease.

The tumour patients were consistently more likely to have been exposed to dental X-rays.

One of the most common procedures is the "bitewing" X-ray which uses an X-ray film clenched between the teeth in a tab of plastic or cardboard.

Bitewing X-rays check for decay between the teeth and can also expose bone loss caused by severe gum disease.

Over a lifetime, patients with meningioma were between 1.4 and 1.9 times more likely than controls to have undergone bitewing X-rays on a yearly or more frequent basis.

An increased risk of meningioma was also linked to "panorex", or "panoramic" X-rays which provide a broad view of the jaws, teeth and nasal area. They reveal problems such as impacted teeth, cysts, infections and bone abnormalities.

People who had panorex X-rays when they were younger than 10 years old had an almost five-fold greater chance of developing meningioma.

Having the X-rays once a year or more often was associated with a 2.7 to three times increase in risk, depending on age.

The findings appear in an early online edition of the journal Cancer, published by the American Cancer Society.

Dr Elizabeth Claus, from Yale University School of Medicine, and colleagues wrote: "Our findings suggest that dental X-rays, particularly when obtained frequently and at a young age, may be associated with an increased risk of intracranial meningioma, at least for the dosing received by our study participants."

The scientists noted that radiation doses from dental X-rays today are lower than they were in the past.

The patients taking part in the study were diagnosed at between 20 and 79 years of age. Some of them would therefore have been exposed to higher radiation doses earlier in their lives.

Ionising radiation, such as X-rays, is known to be the most important risk factor for meningioma brain tumours.

However, most research on meningioma and ionising radiation has focused on high exposure levels from atomic bombs or cancer treatments.

Previous studies had hinted at an increased risk from dental X-rays, but were limited by small numbers of patients who may have received high radiation doses, said the researchers.

British cancer expert Dr Paul Pharoah, from Cambridge University, said the study was "carefully designed and well conducted".

He added: "The authors report that dental X-rays are associated with a small relative increase in risk of disease of approximately 50% or 1.5-fold. This finding is statistically significant.

"However, as the disease is rare, the increase in absolute risk is tiny - the lifetime risk increasing from 15 in every 10,000 people to 22 in 10,000.

"People who have had dental X-rays do not need to worry about the health risks of those X-rays. Nevertheless, dental X-rays should only be used when there is a clear clinical need in order to prevent unnecessary exposure to ionising radiation."

Professor Damien Walmsley, scientific adviser to the British Dental Association, said: "X-rays are a vital tool in dentistry and reveal problems in the teeth and surrounding bone that simply cannot be observed by the naked eye, and often before patients experience any pain or discomfort. The earlier dental problems are identified, the easier they are to treat.

"Regulations governing the use of X-rays in the UK are considerably more stringent than in the US. Dentists in the UK are only permitted to take X-rays where these are absolutely necessary. This means that fewer X-rays are taken in dental practice and modern equipment has reduced exposure to radiation to extremely low levels.

"Dentists are also required to undertake regular training in the use of X-rays to ensure they are up to date with the latest techniques in deciding how, and when, these are required. This maximises safety for patients, while retaining an essential tool in the diagnosis of dental disease."

Responding to the study, a Department of Health spokesman said: "Patient safety is a priority and the UK has stringent safeguards in place covering the use of dental X-rays. All X-ray exposures must be clinically justified.

"Radiation protection is a mandatory topic for continuing professional education for dentists and must be undertaken to maintain registration with the General Dental Council."

FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE

Frequent dental X-rays may significantly increase the risk of non-malignant brain tumours, say researchers. Over a lifetime, having dental X-rays can double or triple the chances of developing meni...
Frequent dental X-rays may significantly increase the risk of non-malignant brain tumours, say researchers. Over a lifetime, having dental X-rays can double or triple the chances of developing meni...
Filed by Kyrsty Jade Hazell  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:01 on 17/04/2012
This relates to Panorex/Panoral x-rays always thought of as very low radiation to patients. All radiation is possibly harmful as the effect is accumalative. There is now a New Kid on the block CBCT (Cone Beam CT) Tthe dental equivalent to the CT we see in hospitals. This type of x-ray is far more powerfull then Panorex/Panoral. Also of possibly more concern is that during CBCT procedures much greater 'Scatter' radiation is produced. The Thyroid gland is always in the 'scatter' radiation area and dental practioners do not offer any Thyroid protection to their patients. If you look at some of the manufacturers promotional lit. you will often see that the eye orbit/lens is in the direct beam. The lens of the eye is again considered as being susceptible to radiation, in particular in the adolescent population. The dental practioners have no reason in general to include the eye socket/lens. Studies have shown that such radiation can possibly induce cataracts again the young are at particular risk and as much dental care id delivered to this section of the population there are growing concerns for the use of such equipment. Most Dental practionetrs have received nil or very little training in this more powerful equipment. Consider the depth of training for radiographers in the general hospital CT/X-ray rooms...where are they in the dental sector!!!
It is left to the general dental practioner who is ill equipped to use such equipment
20:07 on 10/04/2012
I had over 70 X-Rays of my jaw/teeth/head (panoramic type, full side of head, Quadrant [from each corner of my jaw - upper and lower, face on etc bitecard / main & rigged] ). What would this mean for someone like me - this happened over 2 years and I was only 13 when it was operated on so these X- Rays were probably from the age of 10 - 11 years? I will probably never know - but they have to scaremonger dont they? Typical of the newspeople!
17:04 on 10/04/2012
Three things should pop out of this article. 1. "self-reported" information LOL 2. people "shouldn't worry about needed dental x-rays. 3. Almost every article on this "health" site is a subtle indicator of how obamacare will affect the delivery of health care in this country, and it is not good.
11:18 on 10/04/2012
Haing read paragraphys 3 and 4m especially line about majoirity being harmless, I decided not to continue reading.