Chris Packham, TV Presenter, Says Foxes DON'T Attack And Britons Are 'Hell-Bent' On Attacking Them

Huffington Post UK/PA  |  Posted: 24/04/2012 10:41 Updated: 24/04/2012 15:35

Chris Packham
Foxes don't attack, claims Packham

Wildlife TV presenter Chris Packham has said he "doesn't believe" people get attacked by foxes.

He has labelled the British as nature lovers "only when it suits us."

Packham's claims are extremely controversial, as though fox attacks are rare, there have been a number of well-publicised incidents.

Twin baby girls Lola and Isabella Koupparis were mauled by a fox in 2010, after the urban scavenger crept in through an open bedroom window at their south London home.

The girls were taken to hospital with serious injuries. Yet columnnist Rod Liddle has echoed Packham in the Spectator saying "My suspicion is that all of them are made up."

Packham has said that Brits are "hell-bent" on blaming foxes for everything.

Packham told the Radio Times that the urbanisation of the fox was "celebrated" in the late 1960s but "now we've seemingly tired of their antics and we're hell-bent on blaming them for all the crimes we can".

"But their only true crime is ... being too successful and that's another thing we Brits just can't stand," he told the magazine.

"Validated assaults of dogs and cats are non-existent, except under exceptional circumstances.

"And as for attacks on humans - I'll be necessarily diplomatic - I don't believe it," he said.


Fox don't attack, claims Packham


The urban fox that mauled the twins is not the only recorded attack. Student Mario Castilli woke up in his attic bedroom last July, to find a fox had latched onto his eyelid, and was biting him in the face.

Following the fox attack, Ursula Keeling, who was living in the house with Castilli, told the Mail:

"We've got to get the message across that because they are predators they have no fear of anyone. Even if you see them on the road they just watch you. They are dangerous."

Quick Poll

Do you think fox attacks are a problem?

VOTE

In 2004 a pensioner was savaged in Edinburgh by a prowling fox, which "pounced" as she went to feed her cat.

Margaret O’Shaughnessy, 88 was left with a three inch bite mark on her leg, following the fox attack.

Packham's claims that foxes don't attack animals also seems to contradict reports from both city and country dwellers. A 4ft long fox weighing 38lbs was shot by a farmer Alan Hepworth in Aberdeenshire farm in March. At the time, Alan Hepworth said he had to shoot the creatures to "stop them from attacking the lambs."


Thought to be the largest fox in the UK

Jonathan Reynolds, senior research scientist at the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust (GWCT), told the BBC that one explanation for such a large fox was that they are "getting better fed" in urban areas, adding "a 38lbs fox would have been unthinkable a few years ago."

Packham, 50, who has previously waded into controversy for saying that pandas should be allowed to die out and for calling on parents to have fewer children, told the Radio Times: "A nation of nature lovers? Only when it suits us, when it's on TV or at arm's length.

"But as soon as a species survives in spite of us, has the effrontery to become common, then we want to control it - kill it."

Packham made the comments in connection with Channel 4 programme Foxes Live: Wild in The City. Channel 4 are carrying out the UK’s largest ever urban fox census to discover whether the public love or loathe foxes. The census can be carried out here – www.channel4.com/foxes

Launch Slideshow
 HIDE THUMBNAILS
1 of 6
PLAY ALL
ADVERTISEMENT
FOLLOW UK

 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:21 AM on 04/25/2012
Chris Packham is absolutely spot-on, and a big Thank-You to him, for speaking the truth. Let's get a few things straight. Firstly, the old lady in Scotland was most certainly NOT 'savaged' by a fox; (see, this is EXACTLY what Chris is talking about) when she went to feed her cat, she tried to stroke a fox and being a wild animal, he merely bit her, that's all. Secondly, where's the proof that a 'fox' was anywhere near those twins ? It's common knowledge, although hidden by the media, that the parents rejected a scientific investigation into the incident AND refused a bite analyst to examine the children, and did so whilst there was a baying mob at their door !!!! Surely anyone with an ounce of common sense would have jumped at the idea, to prove what they were saying was true ? I believe the culprit to be a terrier dog/dogs. Believe this story if you must, but while you're at it, say 'hello' to the Faeries for me.
11:32 AM on 04/24/2012
Tell that to the twin baby girls who are permanently scarred from a fox attack.
photo
vividrick
I came, I saw...I had a cup of tea!
11:03 AM on 04/24/2012
They're hardly the fatal bear, lion, snake, tiger, crocodile or shark attacks that people in other countries have to risk & endure. We have rather a tame wildlife in comparison, foxes should be celebrated & looked after.
06:13 PM on 04/24/2012
Precisely.
We now have an utterly infantalised population in the UK utterly incapable of understanding anything to do with nature and wild life. Couple this restricted life view and rabid over reaction to any of life's little vicissitudes and we get this intolerant aggressive drooling from the undereducated.
11:00 AM on 04/24/2012
Obviously there is evidence that fox attacks happen... but they are incredibly rare. By far - more people are attacked by domesticated dogs, so I don't understand why people are that worried about foxes. How many fox attacks have you heard about in the last 20 years vs all manner of other sorts of animal attacks?