New light is being shed on a star painting in Tate Britain's new pre-Raphaelite exhibition after phallic symbols were apparently discovered in the work.
Pre-Raphaelites: Victorian Avant-Garde traces the 19th century British art movement led by Dante Gabriel Rossetti, William Holman Hunt and John Everett Millais.
Tate curator Dr Carol Jacobi is challenging the reputation of Victorians being repressed with a research paper on the painting Isabella (1848) by Millais in the show.
Can you spot the phallic symbols?
Her paper, to be published through the Tate, examines phallic symbols in the painting of two merchant brothers from Florence who discover that their sister has been having an affair with a clerk, Lorenzo. In the medieval story, retold in the Keats poem Isabella, the enraged brothers murder the clerk but Isabella digs up his body and plants his head in a pot of basil.
Dr Jacobi said that the shadow of a nutcracker, as well as the shape of one of the brother's legs, appears to be phallic symbols.
"It's not a one-off or a Freudian slip. It enriches our understanding of what is so hard to do in painting. It enriches our understanding of the characters," she said.
"This exhibition gives us the chance to look at it. Is it deliberate? If so, why would he have included it? It's quite shocking and unusual. It might be that the brothers are thinking about the desire and the dangers of desire.
"But more research needs to be done into how the Victorians saw what was Millais' first pre-Raphaelite painting."
Share your vote on Facebook so your friends can take this poll
Asked why the apparently phallic symbols were not noticed before, Dr Jacobi, whose paper is entitled Sugar, Salt And Curdled Milk: Millais And The Synthetic Subject, said: "When you look at a painting you have a story in your mind, so if something slips out you don't see it."
Dr Jacobi, who did not curate the Tate show, said another image in the painting, of salt being spilled, would have been familiar to Victorian audiences as a reference to a lack of sexual self-control.
The exhibition, which opens on 12 September, has been five years in the making and will also be shown in Washington, Moscow and Tokyo.
Andrew Lloyd Webber and Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page have loaned some of the 150 works of sculpture, photography, drawings and applied arts on display.
Loading Slideshow
Michelangelo (1475-1564)
Twenty years after painting the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, Michelangelo sparked hot dispute with his enormous fresco, The Last Judgment. It depicted nudity on the chapel's alter wall and the Catholic counter-reformation critics were horrified. They deemed the work unfit for a papal chapel and after Michelangelo's death the offending genitalia were covered up.
PHOTO: Artfinder
Jean-Louis André Théodore Géricault (1791-1824)
Géricault's monumental The Raft of the Medusa, depicted the aftermath of a contemporary French shipwreck in which the captain had left the crew and passengers to die. The painting ignited political controversy in Paris, fuelling widespread condemnation of corrupt authorities, but Géricault went on to become a pioneer of the Romantic movement - not bad for an artist who launched his career with a sinking ship.
PHOTO: Artfinder
Édouard Manet (1832-1883)
Édouard Manet (1832-1883) - Édouard Manet caused a stir in the Paris Salon with his early painting The Luncheon on the Grass (Le déjeuner sur l'herbe). Showing naked women frolicking around fully dressed companions, they appeared to hold a mirror up to the prostitution problem that was rife in Paris' parks at the time - a taboo the city was not happy to confront head on.
PHOTO: Artfinder
John Singer Sargent (1856-1925)
When the prominent portrait painter chose the beautiful young socialite Virginie Amélie Avegno Gautreau as a subject, she was delighted. But when the painting was unveiled to the public under the title Portrait de Mme *** the sitter's flushed ear and provocative loose shoulder strap caused a stir: Gautreau was humiliated and her mother requested the painting be taken down. Sargent renamed the piece to the more impersonal Madame X and repainted the dress strap to make it look more securely fastened.
PHOTO: Wikipaintings
Pablo Picasso (1881-1973)
Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon was originally entitled The Brothel of Avignon. The women pose in primitive attitudes and the piece was deemed savage and immoral even by Picasso's supporters. Though it is now considered a revolutionary achievement, it remained rolled up in Picasso's studio for years after it was first shown.
PHOTO: Wikipaintings
Marcel Duchamp (1887-1968)
Perhaps the most scandalous in Duchamp's string of provocative works was his porcelain urinal, signed 'R.Mutt' and entitled Fountain. When it was submitted for the exhibition of the Society of Independent Artists in 1917, it was rejected by the committee, despite the fact that the rules stated that all works would be accepted by artists who paid the fee.
PHOTO: PA
Marcus Harvey (born 1963)
British artist Marcus Harvey found himself at the centre of scandal when his painting Myra was vandalised (with eggs from Fortnum & Mason) by angry members of the public when it was put on display at the Royal Academy of Art in 1997. It depicted the child murderer Myra Hindley in a portrait created completely out of the handprints of small children. The Sun said: "Myra Hindley is to be hung in the Royal Academy. Sadly it is only a painting of her".
PHOTO: PA
Marc Quinn (born 1964)
When sculptor Marc Quinn's sculpture of pregnant, disabled artist Alison Lapper was unveiled on Trafalgar Square's fourth plinth, Quinn was highly criticised by disability groups for capitalizing on the shock value of disability. Many art critics described the piece as ugly.
PHOTO: PA
Damien Hirst (born 1965)
As Britain's richest artist, Hirst is used to being under the spotlight and is no stranger to scandal. He has been accused of plagiarism on numerous occasions and was much criticised for his use of a baby's skull in 2008 piece, For Heaven's Sake.
PHOTO: Wikipaintings
David Blaine (born 1973)
Not your traditional artist, David Blaine's world-famous endurance stunts have earned him a place in the history books. Whether it's being hung over the Thames, simulating drowning or being frozen alive, his particular brand of performance art has seen him called an illusionist,a publicity hound and a cheat.
PHOTO: PA
New light is being shed on a star painting in Tate Britain's new pre-Raphaelite exhibition after phallic symbols were apparently discovered in the work.
Pre-Raphaelites: Victorian Avant-Garde trace...
New light is being shed on a star painting in Tate Britain's new pre-Raphaelite exhibition after phallic symbols were apparently discovered in the work.
Pre-Raphaelites: Victorian Avant-Garde trace...
SURELY, you jest! Dr. Jacobi must be a real riot! I saw nothing of the kind except MAYBE that green-topped seat on the right. Since when do legs look phallic? Ahhhhhh, the power of suggestion. Girlfriend must be having quite the laugh right about now.
mominator: SURELY, you jest! Dr. Jacobi must be a real riot!
How many phalluses (or should it be phalli?) has this woman seen? They must have been pretty funny shaped ones if I am looking in the right place... or maybe its just me
Reeeeeo: How many phalluses (or should it be phalli?) has this
If you put your mind to it then phallic symbols and objects abound all around us. But I do love the statement that "When you look at a painting you have a story in your mind, SO IF SOMETHING SLIPS OUT you don't see it."
mrjohnbrazil: If you put your mind to it then phallic symbols
Sat for five minuet's looking and seeing nothing, then all of a sudden I noticed something going on on the right, bottom corner of the seat that Isabella is sitting on, not a symbol as such but it does look like shananagins going on. Mind you they do say you imagine stuff when ya not had............ erm never mind. ;0x
dnnngels: Sat for five minuet's looking and seeing nothing, then all
Cant see anything,the guy in the white tights on the left cant seem to reach the Dogs private parts with his toe.....and when he leans back the chair is gonna drop right onto that Dogs " Town Halls"...........thats my take on it
songster: Cant see anything,the guy in the white tights on the
The position of the shadow on the left hand side of the tablecloth is almost certainly just an unfortunate coincidence. However I suspect that just below it, behind the leg and hidden by it, there is an actual phallus. In fact, I'd guess that there are at least half a dozen actual phalluses in that room, Not to mention the female sexual organs that Carol fails to mention. The woman in the foreground, for instance, clearly has boobs, and while they aren't very big and they appear to be obscured by her clothing, I'd contend that that isn't actually clothing. It's just paint, cunningly applied so that it looks like clothing.
MTGradwell: The position of the shadow on the left hand side
Why in heavens name would anyone seek phallic symbols in this painting?
What a load of nonsense
And probably repressed sexuality
On the part of the woman curator
Perhaps she WANTED to see a phallus?
Perhaps she needed to see a phallus
Perhaps she needs new glasses
majdf18148: Why in heavens name would anyone seek phallic symbols in
the shadow on the tablecloth, on the left corner is what i took to be the subject of this posting? and when all the shadows are left leaning seems the shadow on the tablecloth is not correct. thats my take on the issue!
pasted: the shadow on the tablecloth, on the left corner is
PA/Huffington Post | Posted: 11/09/2012 08:30 Updated: 11/09/2012 08:48