Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Aaron Peters

GET UPDATES FROM Aaron Peters
 

Why We Students Are Marching on 9 November

Posted: 08/11/11 14:58 GMT

Why are we marching, school and university students together, this Wednesday from University of London Union to Europe's financial heart the City of London?

We are marching in opposition to the government's proposed higher education white paper, a document whose proposals must be opposed by all who favour a system of higher education founded on the principle of need and not moneyed privilege.

The white paper, released this summer, represents as insidious a challenge to British universities, and with it the life chances of millions, as the debacle that was last year's Higher Education Act which passed in utter ignomy on 9 December through the House of Commons. It was the passing of this legislation that brought a near-breakdown within the governing coalition of the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, slashing the governing majority by some two-thirds, the Liberal Democrats displaying their now regular insipidity by merely abstaining rather than voting against what they knew to be an abhorrent and undemocratic piece of legislation.

All of this occurred while 35,000 schoolchildren and university students, not even mobilised by their union (the NUS), once more took to the streets of London. From as far afield as Belfast and Glasgow they endured the batons and horse charges of the London Metropolitan Police and articulated their anger at a government with no mandate, and a set of reforms without reason or sense of fairness. The bravest and most thoughtful among us that day were outside the gates of Westminster and not confined within them.

But in truth, to ask why British students are marching this Wednesday against an increasingly-marketised higher education system is to ask the same as why University of Athens students occupied the Faculty of Economics in 2008 and scrawled upon it 'We are an Image of the Future'.

It is to ask why plazas across Spain were occupied last May by millions who spoke of 'Real Democracy', who lived among each other and every day re-imagined their politics afresh. It is to ask why the J14 movement in Israel, a country with a population of 8 million has seen mass marches of as many as half a million.

To ask why we march is to ask why 951 cities across 80 countries worldwide saw demonstrations on 15 October. It is to ask why in New York, Oakland, Sydney, London and scores of other cities and towns across the world people are occupying and re-appropriating space for public use, redefining our relations with each other and the state. It is to ask why pitched battles between the Greek people and riot police in Syntagma Square are now nearly as regular an occurrence as AEK Athens home football matches played a few kilometres away from Greece's beating political heart.

We are marching because this is not our crisis, and it is not of our making. We are marching because a debt-centred model of higher education funding is destined to fail - already there are the first hints off America's next sub-prime crisis - student debt.

We are marching because we want power over our own lives and not be subject to lives of debt. We want an education premised on human flourishing and not one dictated by corporate interests and 'employability skills'.

We are marching because we have been inspired by others around the world, and yes, also our own surprising, beautiful and vibrant movement of the last year. We have been inspired to believe another education is possible, one built not on debt, but the dignity of learning and common purpose.

 
Why are we marching, school and university students together, this Wednesday from University of London Union to Europe's financial heart the City of London? We are marching in opposition to the gover...
Why are we marching, school and university students together, this Wednesday from University of London Union to Europe's financial heart the City of London? We are marching in opposition to the gover...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moravecglobal
11:11 PM on 11/08/2011
University of California Berkeley hijack’s our kids’ futures: student loan debt.. Like so many I am deeply disappointed by the pervasive failures of Regent Chairwoman Lansing, President Yudof, Chancellor Birgeneau from holding the line on rising costs & tuition increases. Paying more is not a better education.
Faculty wages must reflect California's ability to pay, not what others are paid. Current pay increases for generously paid University of California Faculty is arrogance. Instate tuition consumes 14% of Ca. Median Family Income!
Paying more is not a better education. UC Berkeley(# 70 Forbes) tuition increases exceed the national average rate of increases. Chancellor Birgeneau has molded Cal. into the most expensive public university.
UC President Yudof, Cal. Chancellor Birgeneau($450,000 salary) dismissed many much needed cost-cutting options. They did not consider freezing vacant faculty positions, increasing class size, requiring faculty to teach more classes, doubling the time between sabbaticals, cutting & freezing pay & benefits for chancellors & reforming pensions & the health benefits.
They said such faculty reforms “would not be healthy for UC”. Exodus of faculty, administrators? Who can afford them and where would they go?
We agree it is far from the ideal situation, but it is in the best interests of the university system & the state to stop cost increases. UC cannot expect to do business as usual: raising tuition; granting pay raises & huge bonuses during a weak economy that has sapped state revenues & individual Californians’ income.

Opinions? Email the UC Board of Regents
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rita Khanna
Social liberal but fiscal conservative
03:39 PM on 11/08/2011
you want your tution fees to be paid by someone else? and that too extracted by force under duress?
07:49 PM on 11/08/2011
A typically reductive and fallacious response from the 'fiscally conservative'...
photo
An Independent Woman
Honni soit que mal y pense
01:41 AM on 11/10/2011
This may be off topic in that I'm American, but, for example, we have tax deductable mortgage interest on our homes. The government, rightly, believes that home ownership creates stability and they're willing to "pay" for this stability with this tax deduction. How much of a leap is it for a government, say, to subsidize, in part, the tuition of college/university students. They would do this knowing that well educated citizens tend to make more money and in turn, pay higher taxes. It would seem to be a win/win situation. I don't believe that anyone should be forced under duress to pay for anything! But I do see smart govermental spending and tax policies can create a more stable and well educated citizenry.
09:39 AM on 11/10/2011
Is $1.3 trillion dollars per year for military weapons smart governmental spending? Does that $1.3 trillion create a more stable (Would the citizenry be unstable without this expense?)and well-educated citizenry?