Three years ago I watched with mounting horror the BBC documentary Pedigree Dogs Exposed. I was at a loss to understand why Crufts ignored so many of the physical problems inflicted on the dogs in the name of a 'pure breed'. Three years on and Jemima Harrison, producer of the original, has returned with a follow up about what has been changed in three years. In turns out very little.
Pressure has meant that Crufts has relaxed some of its rulings about standards of appearance but the fundamental issue on breeding has yet to be tackled.
Dogs are being bred, and often repeatedly inbred, with known major health conditions and deformities. The animals with the greatest genetic purity are being used for breeding because the traits of specific breeds are then exaggerated - but it is often these traits that cause horrific suffering.
Whilst the Kennel Club claims no legislative power, there is a lot more it can be doing to protect the health of future dogs.
Firstly, it has the power to change the rules of entry at Crufts. The largest dog show in the world, any changes here are likely to resonate loudly within the dog show community. Ensuring health is judged alongside beauty will encourage dog breeders to consider the actual wellbeing of the animal rather. Easing its standards and allowing dogs of mixed-pedigree would also be a major step forward as a mixed gene pool makes for healthier dogs. These dogs are currently left for the secondary 'fun dog event' Discover Dogs.
Secondly, the breeders' scheme has long been in need of overhaul. With the stamp of the Kennel Club backing breeders up and down the country people may be led to believe they are getting a dog of good health and welfare. However the system is self-accredited allowing poor breeding standards and practises to prevail in the name of the Kennel Club's Accredited Breeder Scheme.
This year, health checks by independent vets at Crufts passed only nine of 15 high profile breeds. Although the 40% which failed, including pekinese and bulldog, were not given their best of breed awards, Crufts views the failure of the dogs to pass veterinarian medicals is a private matter.
The Green Party is fighting for the health of these animals to be taken seriously. As Professor Gerhard Oechtering explained in The Guardian recently dogs need their noses for heat control and without this their health and welfare drops massively.
In the case of pugs, the extreme short nose and flat face seen as desirable for the breed may their restrict breathing to such an extent that if the dog becomes excited, the airways can become sufficiently blocked by the soft palate that they pass out. Also inbreeding the dogs to produce screw tails, which the Kennel Club specifies "should be curled as tightly as possible over the hip" and "a double curl is highly desirable", can cause pain or paralysis and conditions such as spina bifida [2].
Diseases are becoming more prevalent and life-spans are dropping. It has become a grotesque business that will get worse with time for as long as these breeding practises not only continue but are celebrated.
The change should be made within the industry itself but the government must also step in and ensure the welfare of man's best friend is secured by the law. The Green Party has long supported the steps that Jemima Harrison calls for in her documentary: a new independent regulatory body for dog breeding funded by new registration scheme for all dogs and a joined up strategy for tackling stray dogs, dangerous dogs and puppy farms.
The Kennel Club proudly states on its logo "Making a Difference for Dogs" and its time it lived up to that motto by making a real difference to the health and wellbeing of the animals we hold so close to our heart.
Follow Adrian Ramsay on Twitter: www.twitter.com/adrianramsay
Yvonne Taylor: Crufts - A Parade of Genetic Freaks
Caroline Kisko: Crufts and the Facts About Dog Health
Pedigree Dogs Exposed - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pedigree Dogs Exposed - The Blog
Documentary - BBC - Pedigree Dogs Exposed Video by ...
No more walkies for pedigree bums as World's first dog stairlift is developed
Ask Dog Lady: Why did the Westminster dog show pull shelter ads?
Undeniably a problem with ill health in pedigree dogs
Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton's dog Lupo snapped in hot pursuit of a ...
good post..
Please don't blame the breeders that care deeply - increasing laws and inspections will just drive the ethical breeders out of dogs, leaving the careless and the cruel to continue. Ethical breeders almost NEVER make a penny after 20 years of work...there is not even anything to be won in dog shows that is worth anything (unlike horse events, golf, or almost any other sport). A devoted breeder will spend $10,000 on health screening, breeding, whelping, raising, and training/showing a litter - all to get one or two titles and to improve the future. Many even gift dogs to terrific homes that will train/show...all for the love of dogs and the pride of competing.
Professional breeders do not inbreed to preserve "purity", and a "pure" dog is not inherently unhealthy. Doubling up on a particularly healthy, talented, or beautiful animal in a pedigree does not cause disease - but if inherited disease is present, that will reveal itself. It is no different than when two mixed breeds belonging to neighbors produce a litter of puppies. The frequencies of certain issues are KNOWN in a purebred population, but occur randomly in a mixed breed one. No one tracks how many mixes have diabetes, epilepsy, cataracts, kidney issues, etc. No one to blame it on, and no mechanism to correct, such as a breed club or breeders that care about the future. A mixed breed dog is not automatically healthier - both can have issues, but one is tracked and scrutinized because a group of people care. That is why ethical breeders do health screenings for anything that can be tested. It is in no one's interest (especially the dog!) to breed something that has or carries genetic disease.
These articles focus on the bad 10%, and the dog breeding activities that are done to meet the public's demand. I myself am not attracted to dogs of extremes...even though they may have a historical significance, it is the DEMAND from clueless pet owners that drives most of the misery caused to dogs - both through unethical breeding and the shelter problem. Potential owners MUST be educated on health, training, responsible ownership and commitment!!!
Also WHO would pay to import dogs for shelters???
I'd really like to know your sources.
http://justonemorepet.wordpress.com/2011/03/01/the-earth-is-flat-pet-overpopulation-exists-and-other-myths-weve-been-told/
http://www.examiner.com/animal-advocacy-in-tulsa/pet-overpopulation-fact-or-falisty
The All Sato Rescue, www.allsatorescue.org
Owning a dog can be extremely rewarding but a lot of people don't realise what a lifelong commitment it is. Shows like Crufts that focus only on how the dog looks encourage people to think about potential pets in terms of looks too. Image and status is seen to be more important than health and temperament, and the dog's well-being is an afterthought. People become used to flat-nosed dogs gasping for breath, and fail to see how monstrous it is to breed dogs with such deformities.
For every dog bought from a breeder a rescued dog is put down. More should be done to encourage people to get rescue dogs - and more should be done to encourage people to get their dogs neutered. This could be achieved simply with a dog license. It should be expensive enough to make people stop and think about the true cost of dog ownership, but there should be a discount for getting a rescued dog and another discount (or rebate) when the dog is neutered.
When so many dogs are put down every day, it is irresponsible to buy a dog from a breeder and it is irresponsible to breed more dogs.