Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Adrian Ramsay

GET UPDATES FROM Adrian Ramsay
 

Why Dog Breeding Laws Must Be Changed

Posted: 26/03/2012 00:00

Three years ago I watched with mounting horror the BBC documentary Pedigree Dogs Exposed. I was at a loss to understand why Crufts ignored so many of the physical problems inflicted on the dogs in the name of a 'pure breed'. Three years on and Jemima Harrison, producer of the original, has returned with a follow up about what has been changed in three years. In turns out very little.

Pressure has meant that Crufts has relaxed some of its rulings about standards of appearance but the fundamental issue on breeding has yet to be tackled.

Dogs are being bred, and often repeatedly inbred, with known major health conditions and deformities. The animals with the greatest genetic purity are being used for breeding because the traits of specific breeds are then exaggerated - but it is often these traits that cause horrific suffering.

Whilst the Kennel Club claims no legislative power, there is a lot more it can be doing to protect the health of future dogs.

Firstly, it has the power to change the rules of entry at Crufts. The largest dog show in the world, any changes here are likely to resonate loudly within the dog show community. Ensuring health is judged alongside beauty will encourage dog breeders to consider the actual wellbeing of the animal rather. Easing its standards and allowing dogs of mixed-pedigree would also be a major step forward as a mixed gene pool makes for healthier dogs. These dogs are currently left for the secondary 'fun dog event' Discover Dogs.

Secondly, the breeders' scheme has long been in need of overhaul. With the stamp of the Kennel Club backing breeders up and down the country people may be led to believe they are getting a dog of good health and welfare. However the system is self-accredited allowing poor breeding standards and practises to prevail in the name of the Kennel Club's Accredited Breeder Scheme.

This year, health checks by independent vets at Crufts passed only nine of 15 high profile breeds. Although the 40% which failed, including pekinese and bulldog, were not given their best of breed awards, Crufts views the failure of the dogs to pass veterinarian medicals is a private matter.

The Green Party is fighting for the health of these animals to be taken seriously. As Professor Gerhard Oechtering explained in The Guardian recently dogs need their noses for heat control and without this their health and welfare drops massively.

In the case of pugs, the extreme short nose and flat face seen as desirable for the breed may their restrict breathing to such an extent that if the dog becomes excited, the airways can become sufficiently blocked by the soft palate that they pass out. Also inbreeding the dogs to produce screw tails, which the Kennel Club specifies "should be curled as tightly as possible over the hip" and "a double curl is highly desirable", can cause pain or paralysis and conditions such as spina bifida [2].

Diseases are becoming more prevalent and life-spans are dropping. It has become a grotesque business that will get worse with time for as long as these breeding practises not only continue but are celebrated.

The change should be made within the industry itself but the government must also step in and ensure the welfare of man's best friend is secured by the law. The Green Party has long supported the steps that Jemima Harrison calls for in her documentary: a new independent regulatory body for dog breeding funded by new registration scheme for all dogs and a joined up strategy for tackling stray dogs, dangerous dogs and puppy farms.

The Kennel Club proudly states on its logo "Making a Difference for Dogs" and its time it lived up to that motto by making a real difference to the health and wellbeing of the animals we hold so close to our heart.

 

Follow Adrian Ramsay on Twitter: www.twitter.com/adrianramsay

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:56 AM on 03/27/2012
Didn't a squish nosed dog that can't even fly get the ribbon this year for best in show. What a load.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bestuvall
12:27 AM on 03/27/2012
Part 3 of 3: The shelter/rescue problem could be cured by licensing OWNERS, not breeders. Take classes, pass a test, get a license to own a dog. The dog just needs an ID in case they get lost!

Please don't blame the breeders that care deeply - increasing laws and inspections will just drive the ethical breeders out of dogs, leaving the careless and the cruel to continue. Ethical breeders almost NEVER make a penny after 20 years of work...there is not even anything to be won in dog shows that is worth anything (unlike horse events, golf, or almost any other sport). A devoted breeder will spend $10,000 on health screening, breeding, whelping, raising, and training/showing a litter - all to get one or two titles and to improve the future. Many even gift dogs to terrific homes that will train/show...all for the love of dogs and the pride of competing.
12:27 AM on 03/27/2012
Part 2 of 3: I can go along with asking the breed clubs to possibly adjust standards for dogs with extreme features that lead to health problems by their very nature (extremes of size, proportion, face, etc.). It is true there is a tendency for "if some is good more is better". Judges education by the breed clubs can address this in the show venue.

Professional breeders do not inbreed to preserve "purity", and a "pure" dog is not inherently unhealthy. Doubling up on a particularly healthy, talented, or beautiful animal in a pedigree does not cause disease - but if inherited disease is present, that will reveal itself. It is no different than when two mixed breeds belonging to neighbors produce a litter of puppies. The frequencies of certain issues are KNOWN in a purebred population, but occur randomly in a mixed breed one. No one tracks how many mixes have diabetes, epilepsy, cataracts, kidney issues, etc. No one to blame it on, and no mechanism to correct, such as a breed club or breeders that care about the future. A mixed breed dog is not automatically healthier - both can have issues, but one is tracked and scrutinized because a group of people care. That is why ethical breeders do health screenings for anything that can be tested. It is in no one's interest (especially the dog!) to breed something that has or carries genetic disease.
12:26 AM on 03/27/2012
Part 1 of 3: It is disturbing to see the lack of perspective in these articles and comments. The majority of breeders of purebred dogs, especially at the level seen in Crufts, are exceptionally concerned about inherited diseases - there is no future in dogs that are not healthy and happy and live long lives...even if you take the perspective of wanting a show dog. Ethical breeders sell very very few dogs to the public - most have a litter or two per year (or less) and only place dogs with people they know or after putting them through a very rigorous process - it can be easier to adopt a child! They follow all of their pups for life, will take in a dog of their breeding even if it is 12 years old.

These articles focus on the bad 10%, and the dog breeding activities that are done to meet the public's demand. I myself am not attracted to dogs of extremes...even though they may have a historical significance, it is the DEMAND from clueless pet owners that drives most of the misery caused to dogs - both through unethical breeding and the shelter problem. Potential owners MUST be educated on health, training, responsible ownership and commitment!!!
09:00 PM on 03/26/2012
I use to think of GB as being champions for all animals and especially dogs. No longer. Show people are concerned with the health of their breed. They by far outspend on health testing on their breed than a pet owner because they care about protecting their breed. Show people are all about looks, temperment and health. To call these dogs deformed is showing your ignorance. In the USA where 75% of dogs are neutered, we now have a shortage of dogs. Shelters are importing dogs from other countries to sell to keep their doors open and their jobs while still condemning every thing breeder and pedigreed. I like the variety and diversity of dogs and think it will be a sad day to have dogs that all look the same like the street dogs shelters are importing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wendyweb47
Keeping an open mind
12:16 AM on 03/27/2012
Please tell me WHERE you are getting information that shelters are importing dogs to keep their doors open. I can tell you that shelters would LOVE to close due to lack of dogs! They are not in the money making business - most can barely afford to keep their doors open. Visit a few of the rescue sites: http://www.animalleague.org/, http://www.thepetrescue.com/, http://www.meetpaws.com/rescue.html - these three alone have MILLIONS of links to dogs available for adoption because they have been abandoned by owners.

Also WHO would pay to import dogs for shelters???

I'd really like to know your sources.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
05:50 PM on 03/26/2012
Thanks for a very interesting article Adrian.

Owning a dog can be extremely rewarding but a lot of people don't realise what a lifelong commitment it is. Shows like Crufts that focus only on how the dog looks encourage people to think about potential pets in terms of looks too. Image and status is seen to be more important than health and temperament, and the dog's well-being is an afterthought. People become used to flat-nosed dogs gasping for breath, and fail to see how monstrous it is to breed dogs with such deformities.

For every dog bought from a breeder a rescued dog is put down. More should be done to encourage people to get rescue dogs - and more should be done to encourage people to get their dogs neutered. This could be achieved simply with a dog license. It should be expensive enough to make people stop and think about the true cost of dog ownership, but there should be a discount for getting a rescued dog and another discount (or rebate) when the dog is neutered.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bestuvall
03:24 AM on 03/27/2012
aha the old animal rights junk the old PETA standby.buy a dog kill a shelter dog.. please educate yourself as well.. 75% of owned dogs are ALREADY Castrated and spayed over 80% of owned cats.. most places already charge more for a license for natural animals and give a discount to owners who put their pets through surgery to "fix" them I( as if they were broken to begin with)
05:55 AM on 03/27/2012
I doubt that. Maybe 60% are fixed. and 40% of a dog population creates over population.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
05:43 PM on 03/27/2012
Even if you're right and 75% of dogs are neutered, that is nowhere near enough.
When so many dogs are put down every day, it is irresponsible to buy a dog from a breeder and it is irresponsible to breed more dogs.
04:40 PM on 03/26/2012
I couldn't agree with you more! We do need to deal with the whole dog issue. Licences and breeder registration. Additionally, we need to encourage the public to adopt a dog rather than go for a puppy. How many thousands are currently in rescue centres?
01:29 PM on 03/26/2012
The Govt. needs to do a lot more, these extremist pedigree deformity breeders / vets & judging officials need to be removed they are pure evil - The welfare & health of the dogs are paramount - not the money making.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
What's the story mourning Tories?
10:35 AM on 03/26/2012
It seems to be unfixable situation. Breeding in general seems to be out of control to me, it seems to be an aburd fad arouns where I live, be that breeding pedigrees or dangerous dogs for status symbols. I don't see how it can be stopped but I'd start with an annoying tax and far greater penalties for owners of dogs that end up involved in an attack as well as massive fines for not picking up dog poo. On inbreeding I suggest pet insurance companies ramp up premiums for those dogs getting medical attention based on illnesses caused by inbreeding. Basically make laws which are a nightmare, but unproblematic to the responsible owner, not that you'll have an easy job policing them, but it's worth trying to make it all sound more trouble than it's worth.