...does that mean it's okay to go ahead in Northern Ireland and Wales where the Church isn't established anyway?
...does it mean that removal of the Bishops from the House of Lords (the last thing we were told would mean disestablishment) wouldn't actually mean disestablishment and we can go ahead with removing them?
...how long after the introduction of equal civil marriage does the Church intend to hand over its schools?
...how long after the introduction of equal civil marriage does the Church intend to remove its state-funded chaplains from prisons, hospitals and the armed forces?
...why don't they already consider themselves disestablished by virtue of the fact that most marriages already aren't conducted by them anyway but are civil marriages?
Or is this just is a devious, desperate attempt by shamelessly self-interested moral authoritarians to impose their own limited and unshared view of human relationships on everyone else by threats, scare-mongering and hyperbolic raising of the stakes to distract from the fact that this debate isn't - or shouldn't be - about them but about the civil right of two people in love to have their relationship recognised by their friends and family and the law in the country where they live?
You decide!
Follow Andrew Copson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/andrewcopson
David Skelton: I'm Sorry, Dr Fox - Gay Marriage Isn't Just a "Metropolitan Elite" Issue
Amy Lamé: What About Gay Christians Who Want to Get Married in Church?
Isn't it funny how so many Christians feel obliged to follow the word of God when it comes to gays, but feel happy to ignore it so often otherwise? And before anyone claims that they are a Christian and follows the bibles rules and laws in its entirety - you lie. If you did, you'd be in jail because you'd be stoning your neighbour because they weren't observing the Sabbath. Among other crimes.
Robert Dryhurst
Maybe then we wouldn't have had the never-ending stream of scandals over child-abuse, tax avoidance and banking we've to put up with in recent years...